Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Other Sports: Football, Baseball, Local Hockey, Etc...
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-27-2007, 11:14 AM   #1341
flames_1987
#1 Springs1 Fan
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: -
Exp:
Default

The Jaguars are the third best team in the AFC now, the Steelers have really taken a step back these last two weeks. Hopefully the Colts can beat the crap out of the Jags like they do almost every year this week.
flames_1987 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2007, 11:31 AM   #1342
Clever_Iggy
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: City by the Bay
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flames_1987 View Post
The Jaguars are the third best team in the AFC now, the Steelers have really taken a step back these last two weeks. Hopefully the Colts can beat the crap out of the Jags like they do almost every year this week.
Since 2003 are 6-3 against Jacksonville. Their largest margain of victory was this year (22 points), but before this year, their 5 wins ranged between 7-10 points. Conversely last year (week 14) Jacksonville beat Indy 44-17.

With the injuries the Colts are facing and the track record between these two teams, I think it will be close. And I dont see how the Colts usually "beat the crap out of" the Jags every year.

Jacksonville and Tennessee are thorns in Indy's side.
Clever_Iggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2007, 12:01 PM   #1343
Bobblehead
Franchise Player
 
Bobblehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in your blind spot.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KTown View Post
Are you not reading the pats signed Welker to 38 million offer sheet, hence the poison pill Dolphins figured they couldn't match that so they traded and got an extra pick out of it?????????????????????

What I posted there was a quote google Wes Welker and Qualify offer, please before you post next time.
Apparently you aren't willing to read:
Quote:
The Patriots were prepared to sign Welker to an offer sheet that included a "poison pill" that would make it difficult for the Dolphins to match. Yet in hopes of avoiding the bad blood that sometimes can accompany offer sheets - the Seahawks and Vikings recently engaged in a nasty back and forth with offensive lineman Steve Hutchinson and receiver Nate Burleson exchanging teams via offer sheets - the Patriots instead called the Dolphins and proposed a trade.
And from your own quote, "plan to sign" is not the same thing as "signed". Please learn the difference before you post next time.
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
Bobblehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2007, 12:40 PM   #1344
KTown
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: N/A
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobblehead View Post
Apparently you aren't willing to read:

And from your own quote, "plan to sign" is not the same thing as "signed". Please learn the difference before you post next time.
That was just a quote to prove a point. They gave the dolphis the "poison pill" trade him two us and you will get an extra pick, don't and we will sign him to an offer sheet. The dolphins at that time did what was best. They drafted there starting center with the second pick and he has been awesome. The OLine is the only bright spot on this team.
KTown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2007, 01:21 PM   #1345
flames_1987
#1 Springs1 Fan
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: -
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clever_Iggy View Post
Since 2003 are 6-3 against Jacksonville. Their largest margain of victory was this year (22 points), but before this year, their 5 wins ranged between 7-10 points. Conversely last year (week 14) Jacksonville beat Indy 44-17.

With the injuries the Colts are facing and the track record between these two teams, I think it will be close. And I dont see how the Colts usually "beat the crap out of" the Jags every year.

Jacksonville and Tennessee are thorns in Indy's side.
I think Jeff Fisher is one of the best head coach's in the league but the Titans have been anything but a thorn in the side of the Colts. I think the Colts are somewhere near 7-1 in the last 3 or 4 years.

Jacksonville's big win over the Colts last year was there superbowl. It gave the Colts a wakeup call and led them to the superbowl, while the Jags once again did nothing. I'm probablly going a little to far by saying the Colts kick there ass every year, but the Jags just bring it on themselves with how much trash talking the team seems to do leading up to every Colts game. I really don't wanna hear a team talking trash from a team that can't make it to the second round or win there division.
flames_1987 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2007, 08:35 PM   #1346
Bobblehead
Franchise Player
 
Bobblehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in your blind spot.
Exp:
Default

Miami is favoured this week. There are some tough games to pick.
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
Bobblehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2007, 10:42 PM   #1347
Bobblehead
Franchise Player
 
Bobblehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in your blind spot.
Exp:
Default

And Ricky is done....
Quote:
The Dolphins running back suffered a torn chest muscle in Monday night's 3-0 loss to the Pittsburgh Steelers at Heinz Field, a source told The Palm Beach Post this afternoon. Williams will require about four months to fully recover.
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/dolphin...1127ricky.html
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
Bobblehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2007, 09:36 AM   #1348
HOOT
Franchise Player
 
HOOT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: @HOOT250
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobblehead View Post
Miami is favoured this week. There are some tough games to pick.
LOL from +1 to 1.5...its like a hockey game. When I first read it I thought I was reading it wrong and then remember who the two teams were.

Also too bad about Ricky, he is my homeboy!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by henriksedin33 View Post
Not at all, as I've said, I would rather start with LA over any of the other WC playoff teams. Bunch of underachievers who look good on paper but don't even deserve to be in the playoffs.
HOOT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 07:37 AM   #1349
Montana Moe
First Line Centre
 
Montana Moe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Exp:
Default

So.....
Packers at Cowboys, who wins?

I like Dallas to win, but I will be rooting for Green Bay.

Neither will affect my Saints playoff chances, that comes Sunday afternoon.

Though, I would rather see New Orleans play at Dallas if they make the playoffs. The Saints own the Cowboys in recent years.
Montana Moe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 08:22 AM   #1350
burn_baby_burn
Franchise Player
 
burn_baby_burn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chiefs Kingdom, Yankees Universe, C of Red.
Exp:
Default

I picked the Cowboys to win. But I will be rooting for the Packers. Would be nice to see Farve ride off with another Super Bowl Ring.
__________________
burn_baby_burn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 09:36 AM   #1351
HOOT
Franchise Player
 
HOOT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: @HOOT250
Exp:
Default

I'm with you two on this one...Thinking Dallas will win, but will be cheering for Farve and the Packers tonight.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by henriksedin33 View Post
Not at all, as I've said, I would rather start with LA over any of the other WC playoff teams. Bunch of underachievers who look good on paper but don't even deserve to be in the playoffs.
HOOT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 11:12 AM   #1352
MissTeeks
Franchise Player
 
MissTeeks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Ah Page 2. Always a fun read.

Romo vs. Favre

Quote:
Yes, the media are feeding you lines in their attempt to prove that the hair-gel generation's Hollywood-hopping signal-caller is really cut from the same musty mold as the grizzled, Wrangler-wearing legend of Lambeau Field.
Lies. All lies.
But before you get discouraged, it's pretty clear stories suggest a strangely similar Romo-Favre state of affairs.
But you don't have to take my word for it …
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2...uckheit/071129
__________________
The Quest stands upon the edge of a knife. Stray but a little, and it will fail, to the ruin of all. Yet hope remains while the Company is true. Go Flames Go!

Pain heals. Chicks dig scars. Glory... lasts forever.
MissTeeks is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 11:26 AM   #1353
burn_baby_burn
Franchise Player
 
burn_baby_burn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chiefs Kingdom, Yankees Universe, C of Red.
Exp:
Default

Romo grew up a huge Packers fan and a Brett Farve fan. Did anyone see his Farve impersonation last year? It was dead on and very funny.
__________________
burn_baby_burn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 11:29 AM   #1354
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by burn_baby_burn View Post
Romo grew up a huge Packers fan and a Brett Farve fan. Did anyone see his Farve impersonation last year? It was dead on and very funny.
I read in the paper today that he was not a Packer fan - he was more a basketball fan, and Elway was his favorite QB.

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/sports/5337574.html

Last edited by troutman; 11-29-2007 at 11:32 AM.
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 11:35 AM   #1355
burn_baby_burn
Franchise Player
 
burn_baby_burn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chiefs Kingdom, Yankees Universe, C of Red.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by troutman View Post
I read in the paper today that he was not a Packer fan - he was more a basketball fan, and Elway was his favorite QB.

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/sports/5337574.html
He has to say that now. Especially this week. On one of the pregame shows last season they were really going on about it. That is when he did his Farve impersonation.

Edit.

Everywhere you look on the internet it states that as a kid growing up in Wisconsin that Romo was a Packers fan.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Romo

Quote:
A heavy influence on his playing style was Brett Favre. Romo grew up a Packers fan, and during his High School years, Brett was leading Green Bay to a pair of Super Bowl appearances.
__________________

Last edited by burn_baby_burn; 11-29-2007 at 11:46 AM.
burn_baby_burn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 11:45 AM   #1356
HOOT
Franchise Player
 
HOOT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: @HOOT250
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by troutman View Post
I read in the paper today that he was not a Packer fan - he was more a basketball fan, and Elway was his favorite QB.

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/sports/5337574.html
I heard the exact same thing on PTI yesterday, because they both couldn't believe it.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by henriksedin33 View Post
Not at all, as I've said, I would rather start with LA over any of the other WC playoff teams. Bunch of underachievers who look good on paper but don't even deserve to be in the playoffs.
HOOT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 11:50 AM   #1357
HOOT
Franchise Player
 
HOOT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: @HOOT250
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by burn_baby_burn View Post
He has to say that now. Especially this week. On one of the pregame shows last season they were really going on about it. That is when he did his Farve impersonation.

Edit.

Everywhere you look on the internet it states that as a kid growing up in Wisconsin that Romo was a Packers fan.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Romo
Wikipedia?

Quote:
"Honestly," Romo said, "I was more of a basketball fan. Michael Jordan was the guy I had all over my wall and stuff."

"I was probably the outcast," said Romo, who wore football jersey No. 16 at Burlington High School in honor of another of his favorites, Joe Montana.
http://www.dallascowboys.com/news.cf...D8F098231C7E85

Quote:
Tony Romo grew up idolizing Michael Jordan. He rooted for John Elway in Super Bowl XXXII. At Burlington (Wis.) High School in the mid-1990s, when Favre fever was sweeping Wisconsin, he picked No. 16 as his football jersey number in honor of Joe Montana.
"I was probably the outcast," Romo said.
Super Bowl XXXII was: Packers vs Broncos

http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=690251
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by henriksedin33 View Post
Not at all, as I've said, I would rather start with LA over any of the other WC playoff teams. Bunch of underachievers who look good on paper but don't even deserve to be in the playoffs.
HOOT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 12:00 PM   #1358
Sainters7
Franchise Player
 
Sainters7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: back in the 403
Exp:
Default

Honestly, I'm thinkin the Pack might take this one. For me it all depends if Charles Woodson is out there or not. Last I heard he was questionable, but I havent checked it since probably Sunday.
Sainters7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 01:02 PM   #1359
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sainters7 View Post
Honestly, I'm thinkin the Pack might take this one. For me it all depends if Charles Woodson is out there or not. Last I heard he was questionable, but I havent checked it since probably Sunday.

Bingo!! Woodson is a game time decision along with KGB.

If Woodson isn't in I dont think the Pack can stay ahead or even.. And to a lesser extenet Kameer Gbaja Biamila (Excuse the spelling) who has been solid all year. Those two dont play the 'Boys O should roll.

That being said, I haven't seen Favre playing with this much confidence and enthusiasm since 96-97. The Pack should put up points against a suspect Cowboy secondary, but not enough to win.

The spread is 7. I say take the points but the Cowboys win by 3.
transplant99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 02:19 PM   #1360
Sylvanfan
Appealing my suspension
 
Sylvanfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Just outside Enemy Lines
Exp:
Default

I would also reccommend going over the total points too. I think both offences will move the ball. If Woodson is in than the Packers might stand a chance of somewhat containing Dallas down the field passing game. I think this one will be a gooder, and I'll be watching with interest.
Sylvanfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:21 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy