09-03-2015, 09:55 AM
|
#1341
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
|
I expect we should not bring up ISIS and by extension Canadian foreign policy for that matter. We have no interest in such topics here.
|
|
|
09-03-2015, 09:59 AM
|
#1342
|
Franchise Player
|
There is always a horrible crisis going on somewhere in the world. This one happens to be on tv, because the refugees are trying to get into Germany. I think that it is only a matter of time before a large semi-permanent camp is set up on the border of Turkey, and when Syria is settled in a year or few, they will be shipped back home en masse.This is how things are handled when the eyes of the world are not present.
I know that this seems callous, but countries should not have an automatic obligation to take in refugees, if they don't have the infrastructure in place to make them citizens.
Everyone is asking why the Western world is not doing more? Because they are already doing more than the rest of the world, and the refugees know this. No one is running to Egypt, or Saudi Arabia.
Yes, the pictures are horrible. It is all horrible. The unusual thing, unfortunately, is that there are pictures that people are looking at for once.
__________________
"By Grabthar's hammer ... what a savings."
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Harry Lime For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-03-2015, 11:11 AM
|
#1343
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
|
Good little comment piece from Vice.
http://www.vice.com/en_ca/read/leade...to-self-parody
Quote:
Truth is: no matter which of the three leaders becomes prime minister, it will likely have very little impact on your life.
Here we reach the problem: Stephen Harper has trapped his predecessor into continuing his agenda.
If you've got kids, or a bunch of disposable income, you probably really like that agenda. If you have neither, it's probably not for you.
Harper's government promised to mail you cash for every baby you can create, then announced that it would be letting you squirrel away up to $10,000, tax free, in cash and stocks. Then there's income splitting for families and seniors, meaning they can reduce their tax burden by a pretty significant yearly amount. Add onto that the decision to increase defence spending, and you've suddenly got very little room to spend anything on anything.
Neither Mulcair nor Trudeau is talking about ending the procreation awards (that mail out something like $4.5 billion in cheques to parents annually) even though there's not a lot of evidence that mailing micro-payments to families is actually doing anything productive. Trudeau even wants to expand it, albeit re-aiming it at low-income families.
Then there's the wasteland of social engineering tax credits that have been haphazardly stacked in our tax code for decades. Maybe if we had a leader crazy enough to axe that thicket of absurd tax breaks—yeah, go ahead, show me how a $150 child fitness tax credit is really going to convince parents to put their kids in hockey—we'd have some extra cash left to, I dunno, send people to Mars, or whatever it is we feel like doing.
|
|
|
|
09-03-2015, 12:16 PM
|
#1345
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rubecube
Good little comment piece from Vice.
|
Read "The longer I'm Prime Minister". It pretty much talks about the same thing. Harper has done such a good job of getting money out of the governments hands that any of his successors will be forced to raise taxes to pay for their agendas. In terms of politicking it's a great strategy.
As for the convoluted tax code - I think it's ridiculous we fall for those. It's not a conservative phenomenon. Every party tries to buy votes with these gifts. I'd love to see the complete elimination of all of them. Make tax time simple. Income * tax rate = tax paid/owed. I don't care what you trade you're in or how many kids you have or how much you donated or more accurately how good your accountants are. If you make more money you pay more taxes. Simplify the tax code. As a bonus we can cut the CRA budget when taxes are no longer voodoo magic. My apologies ahead of time to the tax accountants that will no longer have jobs - you win some, you lose some.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to kevman For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-03-2015, 01:19 PM
|
#1346
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevman
Read "The longer I'm Prime Minister". It pretty much talks about the same thing. Harper has done such a good job of getting money out of the governments hands that any of his successors will be forced to raise taxes to pay for their agendas. In terms of politicking it's a great strategy.
As for the convoluted tax code - I think it's ridiculous we fall for those. It's not a conservative phenomenon. Every party tries to buy votes with these gifts. I'd love to see the complete elimination of all of them. Make tax time simple. Income * tax rate = tax paid/owed. I don't care what you trade you're in or how many kids you have or how much you donated or more accurately how good your accountants are. If you make more money you pay more taxes. Simplify the tax code. As a bonus we can cut the CRA budget when taxes are no longer voodoo magic. My apologies ahead of time to the tax accountants that will no longer have jobs - you win some, you lose some.
|
Unfortunately it can't quite be as simple as it should with income tax because there are a lot of self-employed people and areas like that with legitimate write-offs. What they should do is eliminate income taxes and instead have a pure consumption tax. Simple, efficient and nothing to file for the average guy at all.
|
|
|
09-03-2015, 01:30 PM
|
#1347
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava
Unfortunately it can't quite be as simple as it should with income tax because there are a lot of self-employed people and areas like that with legitimate write-offs. What they should do is eliminate income taxes and instead have a pure consumption tax. Simple, efficient and nothing to file for the average guy at all.
|
..
Last edited by PeteMoss; 09-03-2015 at 01:40 PM.
|
|
|
09-03-2015, 02:11 PM
|
#1349
|
Scoring Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry Lime
Everyone is asking why the Western world is not doing more? Because they are already doing more than the rest of the world, and the refugees know this.
|
Turkey has taken in 2 million refugees. Jordan and Lebanon have taken in many as well.
|
|
|
09-03-2015, 02:48 PM
|
#1350
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava
Unfortunately it can't quite be as simple as it should with income tax because there are a lot of self-employed people and areas like that with legitimate write-offs. What they should do is eliminate income taxes and instead have a pure consumption tax. Simple, efficient and nothing to file for the average guy at all.
|
The only problem I have with that is that the poor get hit a lot harder as there's no basic exemption.
|
|
|
09-03-2015, 03:02 PM
|
#1351
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
|
I think taxes are a good incentive (or disincentive) for promoting behavior that you think will be beneficial to the country. They are how you guide society. If you want to promote natural population growth, then give child related tax breaks. Or if you want to slow it down, then make it less tax friendly to have children. If you want to educate your population, then give tax breaks for schools and teachers. If you want to promote business, then give the breaks to entrepreneurs.
If you make tax a simple calculation of income or consumption, then you really take away any control for social guidance. I understand disagreeing with certain tax breaks, but they are generally useful.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
|
|
|
09-03-2015, 04:01 PM
|
#1352
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Members of the family had been trying to emigrate to Canada after fleeing Kobani. Teema Kurdi, Mr. Kurdi’s sister and a resident of Vancouver, tried to sponsor another of their brothers and his family, but were rebuffed. She said in a news conference Thursday that her family couldn’t afford to sponsor more than one brother.
Earlier media reports had said Abdullah Kurdi’s family had been rejected. But Canadian officials say there is no record of his family making an application.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/image-of...ard-1441282847
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to the_only_turek_fan For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-03-2015, 04:22 PM
|
#1353
|
First Line Centre
|
So in recent articles I've read and in news reports I've seen, I'm seeing Haper being referred to as "Conservative Leader" instead of "Prime Minister." Is this common during election campaigns, for Prime Ministers to be referred to as party leaders?
__________________
Bleeding the Flaming C!!!
|
|
|
09-03-2015, 04:43 PM
|
#1354
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by the_only_turek_fan
Members of the family had been trying to emigrate to Canada after fleeing Kobani. Teema Kurdi, Mr. Kurdi’s sister and a resident of Vancouver, tried to sponsor another of their brothers and his family, but were rebuffed. She said in a news conference Thursday that her family couldn’t afford to sponsor more than one brother.
Earlier media reports had said Abdullah Kurdi’s family had been rejected. But Canadian officials say there is no record of his family making an application.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/image-of...ard-1441282847
|
So that NDP MLA who said they directly went to Chris Alexander about it can safely be called full of #### now, right? Not sarcasm. That whole thing sounded completely made up.
Last edited by rubecube; 09-03-2015 at 05:03 PM.
|
|
|
09-03-2015, 05:01 PM
|
#1355
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Vancouver
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rubecube
So that NDP MLA who said they directly went to Chris Andrews about it can safely be called full of #### now, right? Not sarcasm. That whole thing sounded completely made up.
|
The MP delivered a letter asking for help, not the application.
Quote:
She did say that a her local MP, New Democrat Fin Donnelly, personally delivered a letter to Chris Alexander asking for help from his office for young Alan Kurdi and his family.
The department of Foreign Affairs released a statement Thursday saying Mohammad Kurdi’s application was received, but was “returned as it was incomplete as it did not meet regulatory requirements for proof of refugee status recognition.”
“There was no record of an application received for Mr Abdullah Kurdi and his family.”
Donnelly, however, said the family had indeed pursued refugee status for the Kurdis and his letter reflected that. There was no immediate word whether the government got the request. Donnelly couldn’t be immediately reached for comment following Tima Kurdi’s news conference.
|
http://news.nationalpost.com/news/ca...ee-application
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to worth For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-03-2015, 05:05 PM
|
#1356
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rubecube
So that NDP MLA who said they directly went to Chris Andrews about it can safely be called full of #### now, right? Not sarcasm. That whole thing sounded completely made up.
|
You may misunderstand.
If in fact the story is correct, who says it went past the minister's desk? Is it possible this falls solely on Andrews? If it never went past his desk, it would never get in the hands of immigration officials. All of which is just wildly unfounded speculation on my part.
|
|
|
09-03-2015, 05:09 PM
|
#1357
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EldrickOnIce
You may misunderstand.
If in fact the story is correct, who says it went past the minister's desk? Is it possible this falls solely on Andrews? If it never went past his desk, it would never get in the hands of immigration officials. All of which is just wildly unfounded speculation on my part.
|
I completely whiffed on this one anyways (got Alexander's name wrong, MLA instead of MP, couldn't remember the MP's name). That's what I get for reading it first thing in the morning and not really following up on it.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to rubecube For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-03-2015, 08:33 PM
|
#1358
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazy Flamer
So in recent articles I've read and in news reports I've seen, I'm seeing Haper being referred to as "Conservative Leader" instead of "Prime Minister." Is this common during election campaigns, for Prime Ministers to be referred to as party leaders?
|
Parliament is dissolved when the election is called, so while I'm no expert on these things I imagine that means he technically isn't Prime Minister right now.
|
|
|
09-04-2015, 04:39 AM
|
#1359
|
tromboner
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rubecube
The only problem I have with that is that the poor get hit a lot harder as there's no basic exemption.
|
GST rebate. Problem solved.
I guess you'd still need to qualify based on income, but that doesn't really change things for the affected people.
Last edited by SebC; 09-04-2015 at 04:43 AM.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:51 PM.
|
|