06-08-2021, 10:02 PM
|
#13121
|
Franchise Player
|
I'd be wary of trading for Tarasenko. He's been injured or recovering for a long time now, not sure if he'll ever be back to what he was. 2 more years at 7.5M is a big gamble. Not to mention Tarasenko has a full NTC so a trade is highly unlikely anyway.
|
|
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Jacks For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-08-2021, 10:14 PM
|
#13122
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacks
I'd be wary of trading for Tarasenko. He's been injured or recovering for a long time now, not sure if he'll ever be back to what he was. 2 more years at 7.5M is a big gamble. Not to mention Tarasenko has a full NTC so a trade is highly unlikely anyway.
|
Yeah, seems like a terrible deal unless the acquisition cost is very low...certainly not the names being thrown around here
__________________
GFG
|
|
|
06-08-2021, 10:28 PM
|
#13123
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by delayedreflex
Tkachuk for Tarasenko + a pick? Tarasenko only has a couple years left on his contract, but could be that #1 RW that Calgary desperately needs, and you gotta think St. Louis would love to have Tkachuk (and he would probably love playing there). Not sure if we really need the Monahan <-> Thomas swap, Sutter seems to think highly of Monahan so unless his body is completely broken I think he can bounce back. I suppose from an asset perspective though trading in for the younger player is probably in Calgary's favour.
|
Woof. That would be instantly regrettable. 6 year difference between the two and hasn’t Tarasenko had shoulder issues? 3 surgeries on it so far. 34 games play d over the past 2 years. Hard pass.
If the Flames are going to trade Tkachuk, I’m reasonably sure they can get a much better offer than that. If you going to trade him to St. Louis you start with Thomas/Kyrou and start adding.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TOfan For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-08-2021, 10:31 PM
|
#13124
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Saving the world one gif at a time
|
I wouldn't touch Tarasenko with a 10ft pole.
__________________
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Wolfman For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-08-2021, 10:42 PM
|
#13125
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Phoenix, AZ
|
I am only taking on Tarasenko if we get Thomas back in return.
Monahan and Tkachuk for Thomas and Tarasenko (and maybe another plus by St. Louis) makes sense for both sides.
|
|
|
06-08-2021, 10:49 PM
|
#13126
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Kelowna
|
I'd take Thomas on the Flames just so his goal song can be Smooth by Santana
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to DomeFoam For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-09-2021, 05:37 AM
|
#13127
|
Pent-up
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Plutanamo Bay.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mass_nerder
Promising young-(ish) player for a veteran. It's the kind of trade that will look silly almost instantly and will look even worse for years afterward.
I'm not against trading Chucky, but f we're dealing him, it has to be for someone 25 or younger. Acquiring Tarasenko, who will be 30 next year, for Chucky, who is basically 6 years younger and who has already put up a better season than any season Tarasenko has had, seems insane to me.
We're not close to winning a cup, so why would we be trading good young players for vets?
|
Holy crap Tarasenko is 30 already…
|
|
|
06-09-2021, 05:56 AM
|
#13128
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Saskatoon
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan
I am only taking on Tarasenko if we get Thomas back in return.
Monahan and Tkachuk for Thomas and Tarasenko (and maybe another plus by St. Louis) makes sense for both sides.
|
Personally I think something like Backlund and Tkachuk for Thomas and Tarasenko is better. I also think St. Louis might be a team that wouldn’t be on Backlund’s no trade list.
|
|
|
06-09-2021, 06:14 AM
|
#13129
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by flamesgod
Personally I think something like Backlund and Tkachuk for Thomas and Tarasenko is better. I also think St. Louis might be a team that wouldn’t be on Backlund’s no trade list.
|
Agreed. If Monahan bounces back, which I think is a legitimate scenario, Monahan-Tkachuk for Thomas-Tarasenko isn’t much better. I’m having a hard time understanding why the Flames would want to trade young players who are either entering their prime, or in it, for one who is on hole 17. Backlund on the other hand, maybe. But I still question that.
Also worth noting Tarasenko has a NTC. Seems likely to me Calgary would be on that list.
|
|
|
06-09-2021, 09:50 AM
|
#13130
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan
I am only taking on Tarasenko if we get Thomas back in return.
Monahan and Tkachuk for Thomas and Tarasenko (and maybe another plus by St. Louis) makes sense for both sides.
|
That's absolutely brutal for Calgary.
Tarasenko should hold no more value than Monahan. Tkachuk is on a completely other level than Thomas.
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to HighLifeMan For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-09-2021, 09:55 AM
|
#13131
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Lethbridge
|
lol at people still thinking this is Tarasenko from 2016. He's nowhere near that anymore and carries a big cap hit.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to mdubz For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-09-2021, 09:57 AM
|
#13132
|
First Line Centre
|
I’m shocked and appalled at these trade suggestions.
Tkachuk and Monahan/Backlund for Tarasenko and Thomas?
Wtf are you guys smoking?
Tarasenko is 30 and injures his shoulder seemingly every year and Thomas is extremely unlikely to ever come close to what Tkachuk would offer in his worst season.
|
|
|
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to SeanCharles For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-09-2021, 10:19 AM
|
#13133
|
Franchise Player
|
I must be missing something on Thomas. Don't see why he would be the centerpiece for a Tkachuk trade. Don't hate Backlund for Tarensenko though.
|
|
|
06-09-2021, 10:21 AM
|
#13134
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Alberta
|
Let's trade our consistent young goal scorer with recent injuries issues for a less consistent older goal scorer with longer term injury issues!! ![Smile](images/calpuck/smilies/smile2.gif) /s
Critical undervaluing of Monahan continues.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Monahammer For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-09-2021, 10:22 AM
|
#13135
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonded
I must be missing something on Thomas. Don't see why he would be the centerpiece for a Tkachuk trade. Don't hate Backlund for Tarensenko though.
|
I am guessing most people putting trade proposals for Thomas have seen him play for less then 3 games and have no idea is/how good his is!
This seems to be the way these things work - 1 Person throws out a new players name the Flames could acquire, and then 20 variations for the same player are proposed.
All of a sudden everyone is an expert on the player and for some reason he is exactly what the team needs!
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Jason14h For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-09-2021, 10:27 AM
|
#13136
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Indiana
|
If there's any piece I want from St. Louis, it's their 2023 1st round pick.
They're one of those teams that could just collapse at any time. Dallas, Nashville, even Pittsburgh and Boston are some others.
|
|
|
06-09-2021, 10:38 AM
|
#13137
|
Taking a while to get to 5000
|
Is Thomas still living with the Tkachuk's in St. Louis? That would be fun.
|
|
|
06-09-2021, 12:41 PM
|
#13139
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason14h
I am guessing most people putting trade proposals for Thomas have seen him play for less then 3 games and have no idea is/how good his is!
This seems to be the way these things work - 1 Person throws out a new players name the Flames could acquire, and then 20 variations for the same player are proposed.
All of a sudden everyone is an expert on the player and for some reason he is exactly what the team needs!
|
I will not pretend to be an expert, but live in St Louis and see as many Blues games as I do Flames games, which is pretty much all of them
The Blues once thought that Thomas has Mika Zibanejad upside, and he is only 21
Lots of talk locally from Blues media about whether they still think he can attain that.
I can see how it might seem random to throw in some Blues players into a Flames discussion, but was in part triggered in my thoughts by local hockey talk
https://www.stltoday.com/sports/colu...2a9f76983.html
Last edited by Canada 02; 06-09-2021 at 12:49 PM.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Canada 02 For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-09-2021, 01:03 PM
|
#13140
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonded
I must be missing something on Thomas. Don't see why he would be the centerpiece for a Tkachuk trade. Don't hate Backlund for Tarensenko though.
|
St Louis would
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:21 PM.
|
|