05-26-2022, 10:29 PM
|
#1261
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1_Flames_Fan
At worst it's a ####ing redirection.
|
Which is allowed.
|
|
|
|
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Cycling76er For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
05-26-2022, 10:30 PM
|
#1262
|
|
damn onions
|
I don’t know how anyone looks at this and says, the league is not biased against the Flames.
It is. So obviously. Very unfair, and very frustrating. A weak league. No guts.
|
|
|
|
|
05-26-2022, 10:30 PM
|
#1263
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KootenayFlamesFan
I have still not seen any single angle of a kicking motion.
Does this panel know you can direct a puck?
Elliotte is the only sane one there.
|
I think that's part of the problem with interpreted language of the rule. If it sounds subjective that a legal motion is considered illegal by others, than that's confusing.
But the NHL should know it's own rules. So that's completely unacceptable to overturn, if what Coleman did is legal
|
|
|
|
|
05-26-2022, 10:30 PM
|
#1264
|
|
Scoring Winger
|
6-4 Flames calling it now
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Phaneuf_Phan For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
05-26-2022, 10:30 PM
|
#1265
|
|
Franchise Player
|
They are making it sound like Coleman had the time to bring out the whiteboard, set up a play, wink slyly at the camera.
__________________
"By Grabthar's hammer ... what a savings."
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Harry Lime For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
05-26-2022, 10:30 PM
|
#1266
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Peterborough, ON
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by badradio
The fact that they are even arguing about it means it’s not enough to overturn a goal called in the ice.
|
This right here. Especially when it wasn’t even a challenge initiated by Edmonton.
|
|
|
|
|
05-26-2022, 10:30 PM
|
#1267
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elkyiv
To my eye, it's an obvious kick. Not sure how it can even be debated.
|
You need glasses!
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to midniteowl For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
05-26-2022, 10:30 PM
|
#1268
|
|
One of the Nine
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 福岡市
|
Everyone's getting shyte faced tonight.
Tomorrow is going to be painfully good if we find a way to win this in OT
|
|
|
|
|
05-26-2022, 10:30 PM
|
#1269
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Man, forget being a flames fan for a sec.
This series deserves 7 games.
|
|
|
|
|
05-26-2022, 10:30 PM
|
#1270
|
|
Voted for Kodos
|
It literally doesn’t matter if he intended to do it, Bieksa. Because it wasn’t a kicking motion.
It wasn’t intentional, at full speed, it’s literally not possible to think so.
|
|
|
|
|
05-26-2022, 10:30 PM
|
#1271
|
|
First Line Centre
|
Even if he knew what he was doing it’s not a distinct kicking motion. Absolutely garbage that anyone thinks it is What a joke
|
|
|
|
|
05-26-2022, 10:30 PM
|
#1272
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Kevin: There are so many people in Alberta who feel passionately one way or the other about that call.
No s**t Captain Obvious, what a moron.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Jacks For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
05-26-2022, 10:30 PM
|
#1273
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
no matter what angle they look at, I don’t understand they can say is clear enough to over rule the call on the ice, especially when it was going in anyway. Bush league call.
|
|
|
|
|
05-26-2022, 10:30 PM
|
#1274
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
|
Absolutely ####ing garbage
|
|
|
|
|
05-26-2022, 10:30 PM
|
#1275
|
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Erie
|
Shut up Ron!
__________________
Go Flames Go!
|
|
|
|
|
05-26-2022, 10:30 PM
|
#1276
|
|
#1 Goaltender
|
League wants Mack and Mc... Just ####ing embarrassing.
|
|
|
|
|
05-26-2022, 10:30 PM
|
#1277
|
|
Draft Pick
|
Even oiler fan behind me at the game can’t figure out why that wasn’t a goal.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to gboom For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
05-26-2022, 10:30 PM
|
#1278
|
|
Needs More Cowbell
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Not Canada, Eh?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DB93
6-4 Flames in OT. Jarnkrok with the winner.
|
I see what you did there.
|
|
|
|
|
05-26-2022, 10:30 PM
|
#1279
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Calgary
|
1) I'm still fuming, so will try to keep this coherent
2) I don't ducking understand why the duck they could make such a biased ducking call in a critical game like this. Have some balls and allow a goal that's been allowed all year
3) why is this even a topic? in a league that's horny for more goals. Hit it in with your skate/knee/face/dick who cares? I'd probably say you can't use your hand/arm or that opens up it turning into handball... But holy #### does the league ever want the Oilers to win this series. It was going in if he didn't touch it. God damn 2004 all over again
4) flames need to win in OT so this is just a footnote
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Icon For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
05-26-2022, 10:31 PM
|
#1280
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
|
If Coleman plotted all that in the 0.1 seconds that all took place, then he exists in a higher dimension than the rest of us
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Jiggy_12 For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:39 AM.
|
|
