Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-07-2023, 10:11 PM   #12681
MrMike
Franchise Player
 
MrMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Van Island
Exp:
Default

Leafs and Tre have bigger problems now.

Sheldon Keefe says Joseph Woll “will miss some time for sure”. The extent of which will be known when they get home.
MrMike is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to MrMike For This Useful Post:
Old 12-07-2023, 10:30 PM   #12682
browna
Franchise Player
 
browna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMike View Post
Leafs and Tre have bigger problems now.

Sheldon Keefe says Joseph Woll “will miss some time for sure”. The extent of which will be known when they get home.
*cough*Vladar*cough*
browna is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to browna For This Useful Post:
Old 12-07-2023, 11:06 PM   #12683
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMike View Post
Leafs and Tre have bigger problems now.

Sheldon Keefe says Joseph Woll “will miss some time for sure”. The extent of which will be known when they get home.
That makes Toronto, Seattle, Carolina, New Jersey and Buffalo all rumoured to be in the market for goalies. Hopefully it drives up the price for Edmonton as well, when Skinner turns back into a pumpkin.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2023, 12:44 AM   #12684
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Leafs have less regulation wins than the Flames, they are going nowhere
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post:
Old 12-08-2023, 01:24 AM   #12685
Snuffleupagus
Franchise Player
 
Snuffleupagus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanny_McDonald View Post
You mean like the massive overpay the Canucks were forced to pay to get Zadorov?
It's amazes me the power that the Toronto media has on fans, a hit and a goal against the Leafs and the media have people think an overpaid 5-6 Dman is worth the farm.

Fact: Zadorov had to go and go quick, Conroy got the best deal without retaining a dime.
Snuffleupagus is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Snuffleupagus For This Useful Post:
Old 12-08-2023, 08:02 AM   #12686
Hackey
#1 Goaltender
 
Hackey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snuffleupagus View Post
It's amazes me the power that the Toronto media has on fans, a hit and a goal against the Leafs and the media have people think an overpaid 5-6 Dman is worth the farm.

Fact: Zadorov had to go and go quick, Conroy got the best deal without retaining a dime.
Do people think he's worth the farm or do people just realize the return was quite underwhelming? You can say 5th dman all you want but a real fact is that teams covet big dmen going into the playoffs. Especially ones with some grit who actually use their size. You have to completely ignore that fact to think the return was anything but underwhelming.

I also don't think it was super urgent he had to be dealt immediately. Two or three more months wouldn't be the end of the world. Especially if it allowed other teams to be able to fit the contract when only 25% was remaining.
Hackey is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Hackey For This Useful Post:
Old 12-08-2023, 08:06 AM   #12687
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hackey View Post
Do people think he's worth the farm or do people just realize the return was quite underwhelming? You can say 5th dman all you want but a real fact is that teams covet big dmen going into the playoffs. Especially ones with some grit who actually use their size. You have to completely ignore that fact to think the return was anything but underwhelming.

I also don't think it was super urgent he had to be dealt immediately. Two or three more months wouldn't be the end of the world. Especially if it allowed other teams to be able to fit the contract when only 25% was remaining.
It's already been established looking at past deals that this is what bottom pairing generally guys go for.
You may not like it. You may have wanted more. But the market dictates the price. Not the other way.
Jiri Hrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2023, 08:12 AM   #12688
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hackey View Post
Do people think he's worth the farm or do people just realize the return was quite underwhelming? You can say 5th dman all you want but a real fact is that teams covet big dmen going into the playoffs. Especially ones with some grit who actually use their size. You have to completely ignore that fact to think the return was anything but underwhelming.

I also don't think it was super urgent he had to be dealt immediately. Two or three more months wouldn't be the end of the world. Especially if it allowed other teams to be able to fit the contract when only 25% was remaining.
Well, I'm sure we could've received more if the player we were trading did not publicly ask for a trade request. That likely dropped the potential of getting a 2nd round pick to a 3rd and 5th. Additionally, he was wanting more ice time, but we weren't giving it to him because he's the inferior defenseman. And he's going to be in the same exact situation when Soucy comes back in Vancouver.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2023, 08:21 AM   #12689
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Flames with the top 3 names on the TSN trade board:
https://www.tsn.ca/nhl/calgary-flame...ist-1.2046296?
Jiri Hrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
Old 12-08-2023, 08:21 AM   #12690
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

The theme continues with the Flames 3 UFA’s all at the top of the TSN trade board.

Edit- what Jiri said
Vinny01 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2023, 08:25 AM   #12691
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

If Jake Allen is on the list Vladar should be as well.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2023, 08:30 AM   #12692
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
It's already been established looking at past deals that this is what bottom pairing generally guys go for.
You may not like it. You may have wanted more. But the market dictates the price. Not the other way.
The biggest thing with Zadorov is some people view him as a #3-4 and that threw expectations out of whack. There was a small minority who legit thought he was the Flames best dman.
Bonded is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2023, 08:36 AM   #12693
ST20
Crash and Bang Winger
 
ST20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
It's already been established looking at past deals that this is what bottom pairing generally guys go for.
You may not like it. You may have wanted more. But the market dictates the price. Not the other way.
I don't get this line of thinking. This means that no trade in the history of trades are bad because the market at the time dictated the price. You can choose to hold out on trading someone until the market changes.

I also don't buy that Zadarov needed to be traded at this time because of the trade request causing Lockeroom issues. Yes, it probably annoyed guys in the room (as it should) but they are all professionals. Some of them have borderline trade requests of their own. There's never been any indication from players or anyone around the team that he is a bad teammate.

Conroy allowed circumstances around the request to force his hand which is reactionary in nature and typically not good business. I don't think the return is that bad but he definitely could have gotten more with patience.
ST20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2023, 08:49 AM   #12694
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ST20 View Post
I don't get this line of thinking. This means that no trade in the history of trades are bad because the market at the time dictated the price. You can choose to hold out on trading someone until the market changes.
That’s not really what market dictates the returns means though.Return was in line for a #5D. Anything above or below it would have been the variance to judge. If he traded Zadorov for just a 5th that would be below average market value and if he got a 1st it would have been a great trade.
The Phaneuf trade was bad the day it was made as it was under market value for young #2D.
Bonded is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2023, 08:51 AM   #12695
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ST20 View Post
Conroy allowed circumstances around the request to force his hand which is reactionary in nature and typically not good business. I don't think the return is that bad but he definitely could have gotten more with patience.
Conroy did actually admit that though.

He straight up said that maybe they could have returned more closer to the deadline or with salary retention.

They just felt that moving him now, without having to retain, and opening up that cap space for between now and the trade deadline, was more important than the potential improvement they could have received.

Now it really remains to be seen for us as fans because I do think the return was light. But if Kylington might actually return then that's a factor (need the cap to activate him, trade value's are immediately lower if teams know you need to shed cap). There might be also other things they have heard around the NHL where they feel they could use the cap to help other things happen.

Really we can't judge it until the deadline. If no other moves happen where the Flames needed the cap space, and the Flames don't use all their retention slots, then I think it's fair to say they messed up the Zadorov deal by not waiting, but don't think we can make that judgement yet.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2023, 09:07 AM   #12696
Hockey_Ninja
 
Hockey_Ninja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH (Grew up in Calgary)
Exp:
Default

Reading that Snow and the analytics department talked Tre out of trading for Ristolainen makes me wonder what other mistakes he helped prevent
__________________
Just trying to do my best
Hockey_Ninja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2023, 09:12 AM   #12697
ST20
Crash and Bang Winger
 
ST20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonded View Post
That’s not really what market dictates the returns means though.Return was in line for a #5D. Anything above or below it would have been the variance to judge. If he traded Zadorov for just a 5th that would be below average market value and if he got a 1st it would have been a great trade.
The Phaneuf trade was bad the day it was made as it was under market value for young #2D.
In my opinion the variance is what people are annoyed with. When you trade that 5D (who would be a 4 on many teams) makes a big difference. There seems to be many contenders looking to add size in the back end due to underperformance of the team or injuries. The reason why the trade had to happen now was not convincing and if they were patient they could have gotten more. I don't see a pressing need for why it needed to happen now.

Last edited by ST20; 12-08-2023 at 09:21 AM.
ST20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2023, 09:21 AM   #12698
ST20
Crash and Bang Winger
 
ST20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18 View Post
Conroy did actually admit that though.

He straight up said that maybe they could have returned more closer to the deadline or with salary retention.

They just felt that moving him now, without having to retain, and opening up that cap space for between now and the trade deadline, was more important than the potential improvement they could have received.

Now it really remains to be seen for us as fans because I do think the return was light. But if Kylington might actually return then that's a factor (need the cap to activate him, trade value's are immediately lower if teams know you need to shed cap). There might be also other things they have heard around the NHL where they feel they could use the cap to help other things happen.

Really we can't judge it until the deadline. If no other moves happen where the Flames needed the cap space, and the Flames don't use all their retention slots, then I think it's fair to say they messed up the Zadorov deal by not waiting, but don't think we can make that judgement yet.
There is no clear reason for why it needed to happen now and I think that is good enough reason for fans to complain and not be told that they should let it go because it was market value. If Kylington was returning in the near term (does not sound like it) and they needed the cap space then sure. I don't believe that would be an issue for trading him since they've been tight lipped about the whole situation so I don't think it would have gotten out that he was returning before they needed to make a move.

I agree that we can't truly judge it until the deadline though. As you mentioned, this could be the first move for Conroy hitting it out of the park by weaponizing that cap space. He could also end up extending everyone, or trading for Ristoleinen making the cap space moot. In the end, I just think it is fair play for fans to be unhappy with the return given what they know so far or the current "market" of information.

Last edited by ST20; 12-08-2023 at 09:26 AM.
ST20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2023, 09:23 AM   #12699
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey_Ninja View Post
Reading that Snow and the analytics department talked Tre out of trading for Ristolainen makes me wonder what other mistakes he helped prevent
Likely a lot. The Flames were tied to OEL for a long time before he eventually went to the Canucks.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2023, 09:30 AM   #12700
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ST20 View Post
In my opinion the variance is what people are annoyed with. When you trade that 5D (who would be a 4 on many teams) makes a big difference. There seems to be many contenders looking to add size in the back end due to underperformance of the team or injuries. The reason why the trade had to happen now was not convincing and if they were patient they could have gotten more. I don't see a pressing need for why it needed to happen now.
I think that is the extra annoyance on Zadorov. I don't think he is 4D on a playoff team let alone a contender and he never had that trade value. Selling three dmen at the deadline might also have led to decreased value for the entire lot especially if they needed to dump cap to activate Kylington.
Bonded is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:27 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy