Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-07-2023, 07:07 AM   #12641
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanny_McDonald View Post
You mean like the massive overpay the Canucks were forced to pay to get Zadorov?
When we aren't receiving cap back and opened up 3.75m cap space without retention on Zadorov, I'd say that's a big win.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2023, 07:20 AM   #12642
CalgaryFan1988
Franchise Player
 
CalgaryFan1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan View Post
When we aren't receiving cap back and opened up 3.75m cap space without retention on Zadorov, I'd say that's a big win.
Well, the owners would say it's a big win. Cap space doesn't do much for me unless they use it on something before the end of the season.
CalgaryFan1988 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CalgaryFan1988 For This Useful Post:
Old 12-07-2023, 07:21 AM   #12643
Scroopy Noopers
Pent-up
 
Scroopy Noopers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Plutanamo Bay.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CalgaryFan1988 View Post
Well, the owners would say it's a big win. Cap space doesn't do much for me unless they use it on something before the end of the season.
It’s the most valuable asset in the league this year. Having cap space opens up trading opportunities.
Scroopy Noopers is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Scroopy Noopers For This Useful Post:
Old 12-07-2023, 07:22 AM   #12644
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CalgaryFan1988 View Post
Well, the owners would say it's a big win. Cap space doesn't do much for me unless they use it on something before the end of the season.
Of course they would. But, this also allows Conroy to sell on the other 3 UFAs who are both paid more, play better, and should get a better return over Zadorov. It's good to have those vacant retention spots when trying to get the best return.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ForeverFlameFan For This Useful Post:
Old 12-07-2023, 07:24 AM   #12645
CalgaryFan1988
Franchise Player
 
CalgaryFan1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

Agree with both of what you said, but again until they do something useful with that space it doesn't mean much to me.
CalgaryFan1988 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CalgaryFan1988 For This Useful Post:
Old 12-07-2023, 07:28 AM   #12646
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CalgaryFan1988 View Post
Agree with both of what you said, but again until they do something useful with that space it doesn't mean much to me.
100%. Talk is cheap when it comes to GMing. I think that's why many were indifferent to Treliving. Talked the big talk, was always kicking tires, but nothing came of it. Our team rarely got better save it some big trades (Hamilton, then Lindholm/Hanifin).

Conroy has the ultimate test this year, and arguably a harder first year than Treliving who inherited a team with a plan to rebuild. Retooling is way tougher to tackle. I hope he is still selling the UFAs and gets a good price out of them.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ForeverFlameFan For This Useful Post:
Old 12-07-2023, 07:44 AM   #12647
Scroopy Noopers
Pent-up
 
Scroopy Noopers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Plutanamo Bay.
Exp:
Default

It’s just so weirdly pessimistic to me to say “yeah whatever, unless he executes”, while he made moves to set up the opportunity. Like, the target is clear… to utilize the space. The time to criticize that is if nothing happens… that’s 3-4 months away.
Scroopy Noopers is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Scroopy Noopers For This Useful Post:
Old 12-07-2023, 07:55 AM   #12648
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TOfan View Post
‘Massively overpay’ is becoming as cringe as ‘immediately fired’. The Flames just need to be smart and make deals that make them better and return positive value on their assets. ‘Massive overpay’ is just noise/nonsense. The Flames should be putting their movable assets on the market and taking the best packages they see fit. Trying to single out one potential trade partner (yes, interpersonal relationships matter for GMs) and demanding ‘massive overpayment’ is probably a bad start for a young GM. Conroy probably wants to be seen as reasonable, but firm, and not a clown.
The whole way a lot of fans talk about trades is cringe. They aren’t a combat where you beat your enemy, or compel them through cunning or intimidation to act against their own interests. It’s a market. No different from selling a used bike on Kijiji. You put up something for sale and the highest bidder takes it. There are often complications around contracts and conditions. Lawyers and capologists have to get involved. But it’s still a market. When two parties agree on the value, they have a deal.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to CliffFletcher For This Useful Post:
Old 12-07-2023, 07:56 AM   #12649
CalgaryFan1988
Franchise Player
 
CalgaryFan1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scroopy Noopers View Post
It’s just so weirdly pessimistic to me to say “yeah whatever, unless he executes”, while he made moves to set up the opportunity. Like, the target is clear… to utilize the space. The time to criticize that is if nothing happens… that’s 3-4 months away.
Nobody is being critical. And the same should be said about getting praise though (3-4 months away and once the space has been utilized).

Until then...
CalgaryFan1988 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CalgaryFan1988 For This Useful Post:
Old 12-07-2023, 07:57 AM   #12650
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

^^ My favorite is when people suggest a deal needs "a sweetener", and then suggest a random 5th round pick or 4th line tweener
Toonage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2023, 08:06 AM   #12651
Scroopy Noopers
Pent-up
 
Scroopy Noopers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Plutanamo Bay.
Exp:
Default

I too hope the GM does his job…
Scroopy Noopers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2023, 08:13 AM   #12652
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CalgaryFan1988 View Post
Agree with both of what you said, but again until they do something useful with that space it doesn't mean much to me.
If they don’t have it the option is closed. If they do have it they can make a deal. Yes, if the deal isn’t good enough they won’t but without the space they can’t even negotiate.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2023, 09:17 AM   #12653
Geeoff
Franchise Player
 
Geeoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

One nice thing about having space is you can get assets for nothing at the trade deadline to facilitate trades between other teams
Geeoff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2023, 09:40 AM   #12654
Flamesfan05
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jayswin View Post
Get them to massively overpay is just fan fiction, basically.
The Flames are the only team with good players to trade
Flamesfan05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2023, 10:02 AM   #12655
868904
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
Well according to Friedman's latest update it was indeed the Flames high ask that the Leafs wouldn't agree to. Yes it's true that Garrioch has always been a bit of a hack.
The Leafs offer was probably no more than a 3rd round pick in the upcoming draft and the Flames needing to retain half. Tre paid a 3rd for Zadorov 3 years ago and I can’t see him paying more.

If the Leafs offered a 2nd round pick in the coming draft with Flames retaining half, Conroy would have taken that.
__________________
Calgary Flames, PLEASE GO TO THE NET! AND SHOOT THE PUCK! GENERATING OFFENSE IS NOT DIFFICULT! SKATE HARD, SHOOT HARD, CRASH THE NET HARD!
868904 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2023, 10:11 AM   #12656
HighLifeMan
First Line Centre
 
HighLifeMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 868904 View Post
The Leafs offer was probably no more than a 3rd round pick in the upcoming draft and the Flames needing to retain half. Tre paid a 3rd for Zadorov 3 years ago and I can’t see him paying more.

If the Leafs offered a 2nd round pick in the coming draft with Flames retaining half, Conroy would have taken that.
The Leafs don't have a 2nd round pick in any of the next three draft years.
HighLifeMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2023, 10:24 AM   #12657
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

My guess is the Leafs offered a single 1st for both Zadorov and Tanev with 50% retention.

Which for 50% retention on two players would be a pretty light return IMO
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2023, 10:44 AM   #12658
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 868904 View Post
The Leafs offer was probably no more than a 3rd round pick in the upcoming draft and the Flames needing to retain half. Tre paid a 3rd for Zadorov 3 years ago and I can’t see him paying more.

If the Leafs offered a 2nd round pick in the coming draft with Flames retaining half, Conroy would have taken that.
I don't think he would have, as he needs 3 retention spots left for the 3 better UFA's.
The Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2023, 10:57 AM   #12659
activeStick
Franchise Player
 
activeStick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Yikes Tre, if true...

https://twitter.com/user/status/1732799177069858933
activeStick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2023, 11:01 AM   #12660
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Leafs fans be afraid.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:36 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy