Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-13-2025, 07:10 PM   #12481
ResAlien
Lifetime In Suspension
 
ResAlien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

I'm going to go take a bold stance and say I'm not particularly concerned about a random rumour from a random Twitter account with less than a thousand followers claiming a trade package that's objectively trash and would result in CC's firing is imminent. Call me crazy
ResAlien is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ResAlien For This Useful Post:
Old 11-13-2025, 07:10 PM   #12482
Rhett44
First Line Centre
 
Rhett44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Exp:
Default

Lebrun said earlier the Flames will not be doing a full rebuild because of Murray Edwards.

So Dreger and Lebrun have both said it. And Steinberg has been hinting at it as well.

I know it's not news, but it makes me angry every time an insider brings it up. That we have such an awful owner that he can't understand we need to rebuild lol.
Rhett44 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2025, 07:11 PM   #12483
CroCop
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MacFlame View Post
the flames received a high first, a conditional third and Miromanov for Noah Hanafin. plus the flames retained 50% salary.

I'm not sure why people think a (likely) low second, Robertson (20 year old winger) and a (undefined) prospect is not realistic for Rasmus.

Hanafin is the better player and both players are likely playing the same "I'm not gonna re-sign with anyone but X team" game.

I hope its better than the above trade rumour, but I'm not getting my hopes up.
I don’t think you’re far off. Much closer than hoping for a 1st and Cowan!

Last edited by CroCop; 11-13-2025 at 07:22 PM.
CroCop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2025, 07:12 PM   #12484
Royle9
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bluejays View Post
Sorry, have any of the insiders put smoke around Rasmus being dealt soon? There are several threads but I haven’t seen anything from anyone here.
His names been out there since the summer, I don't imagine its gone quiet especially with how the teams been doing, in fact the opposite is more accurate.

With that said Craig is definitely not RUSHED to make a trade happen, certainly a forced one for spare parts and a 2nd round pick.
More bottom 6 wingers? Yea sure - Please take the best piece in the trade while you EA25 me by adding on more spare pieces.

I sent out a kite to my contact on this and all I got back was " "
Royle9 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Royle9 For This Useful Post:
Old 11-13-2025, 07:15 PM   #12485
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Canada 02 View Post
what was the rumored trade with the Kings in the summer that was turned down?
I think it was Carter George and picks
Jiri Hrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2025, 07:19 PM   #12486
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roko View Post
What if the prospect is Danford? And the 2nd is conditional and turns to a 1st with a contract extension.
Under the new CBA, trades can no longer include conditional draft picks where the condition is the player signing a contract extension.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2025, 07:29 PM   #12487
MacFlame
Scoring Winger
 
MacFlame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Exp:
Default

Conroy is not rushed to make a deal....That is until the trade deadline arrives and there is.

Sometimes you have to take the best trade available now and consider what might be left on the table come March.

I'm not convinced Rasmus' value is all that high. I hope I'm wrong obviously.

Last edited by MacFlame; 11-13-2025 at 07:32 PM.
MacFlame is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2025, 07:34 PM   #12488
Roko
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Exp:
Default

Ugly game by Montreal. They could use Kadri
Roko is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2025, 07:35 PM   #12489
Flamesfan05
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MacFlame View Post
the flames received a high first, a conditional third and Miromanov for Noah Hanafin. plus the flames retained 50% salary.

I'm not sure why people think a (likely) low second, Robertson (20 year old winger) and a (undefined) prospect is not realistic for Rasmus.

Hanafin is the better player and both players are likely playing the same "I'm not gonna re-sign with anyone but X team" game.

I hope its better than the above trade rumour, but I'm not getting my hopes up.
When did they get the HIGH first for Hanifin?
Flamesfan05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2025, 07:38 PM   #12490
MacFlame
Scoring Winger
 
MacFlame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamesfan05 View Post
When did they get the HIGH first for Hanifin?
lol...I always get it mixed up....is 1st low or high? Is 32 low or high?

...closer to 32nd is what I was getting at.
MacFlame is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to MacFlame For This Useful Post:
Old 11-13-2025, 07:39 PM   #12491
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MacFlame View Post
lol...I always get it mixed up....is 1st low or high? Is 32 low or high?

...closer to 32nd is what I was getting at.
Highest = 1

Lowest =32
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2025, 07:42 PM   #12492
MacFlame
Scoring Winger
 
MacFlame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
Highest = 1

Lowest =32
But 32 is the higher number!

Haha....am I the only one that does this mental dance every time I use this verbiage?

Yes. Probably yes.
MacFlame is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MacFlame For This Useful Post:
Old 11-13-2025, 07:52 PM   #12493
Psytic
First Line Centre
 
Psytic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhett44 View Post
Lebrun said earlier the Flames will not be doing a full rebuild because of Murray Edwards.

So Dreger and Lebrun have both said it. And Steinberg has been hinting at it as well.

I know it's not news, but it makes me angry every time an insider brings it up. That we have such an awful owner that he can't understand we need to rebuild lol.
Doesnt look like they have much of a choice currently.
Psytic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2025, 07:55 PM   #12494
Calgary4LIfe
Franchise Player
 
Calgary4LIfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MacFlame View Post
But 32 is the higher number!

Haha....am I the only one that does this mental dance every time I use this verbiage?

Yes. Probably yes.

Just think of high 1st = high value 1st, and low first = low value 1st.
Calgary4LIfe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2025, 07:57 PM   #12495
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MacFlame View Post
But 32 is the higher number!

Haha....am I the only one that does this mental dance every time I use this verbiage?

Yes. Probably yes.
That's why I prefer to talk about early and late picks within a round. It makes it clear that it's about the order the picks are made, and avoids confusion.

So the Flames this year figure to have a very early 1st and 2nd of their own, with a mid to late 1st in between (plus anything they acquire during the season).
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jay Random For This Useful Post:
Old 11-13-2025, 08:00 PM   #12496
Aarongavey
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roko View Post
He is saying that because they need to wait for the buyout waivers to happen.

What if the prospect is Danford? And the 2nd is conditional and turns to a 1st with a contract extension.
There is no such thing as buyout waivers midseason, buyouts are an offseason thing. He also does not have a tweet that explains why it is tomorrow, just says it had to be tomorrow at 230 PM EST.
Aarongavey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2025, 08:02 PM   #12497
Aarongavey
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MacFlame View Post
the flames received a high first, a conditional third and Miromanov for Noah Hanafin. plus the flames retained 50% salary.

I'm not sure why people think a (likely) low second, Robertson (20 year old winger) and a (undefined) prospect is not realistic for Rasmus.

Hanafin is the better player and both players are likely playing the same "I'm not gonna re-sign with anyone but X team" game.

I hope its better than the above trade rumour, but I'm not getting my hopes up.
That would one thing if Robertson was 20 years old. Sadly he is 24 years old and sucks at hockey.
Aarongavey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2025, 08:17 PM   #12498
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhett44 View Post
Lebrun said earlier the Flames will not be doing a full rebuild because of Murray Edwards.

So Dreger and Lebrun have both said it. And Steinberg has been hinting at it as well.

I know it's not news, but it makes me angry every time an insider brings it up. That we have such an awful owner that he can't understand we need to rebuild lol.
Maybe but if this season continues the way it’s going he might not have a choice. I could see All the vets like weeger, Kadri , Coleman ect asking to be traded in off season if not already traded.
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2025, 08:18 PM   #12499
Sandman
Franchise Player
 
Sandman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I don't think we should hope for a 1a prospect and multiple picks, but if that was the return for Andersson, I would be outraged. Just wait until closer to the deadline if that was the case. I also don't think Toronto is a good trading partner.
Sandman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Sandman For This Useful Post:
Old 11-13-2025, 08:28 PM   #12500
Royle9
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandman View Post
I don't think we should hope for a 1a prospect and multiple picks, but if that was the return for Andersson, I would be outraged. Just wait until closer to the deadline if that was the case. I also don't think Toronto is a good trading partner.
As a rental alone he's worth more than Toronto is allegedly offering, which is why I dont buy it.
Royle9 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Royle9 For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:28 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy