View Poll Results: What ward do you live in?
|
1
|
  
|
12 |
7.95% |
2
|
  
|
13 |
8.61% |
3
|
  
|
11 |
7.28% |
4
|
  
|
6 |
3.97% |
5
|
  
|
5 |
3.31% |
6
|
  
|
17 |
11.26% |
7
|
  
|
10 |
6.62% |
8
|
  
|
14 |
9.27% |
9
|
  
|
6 |
3.97% |
10
|
  
|
1 |
0.66% |
11
|
  
|
9 |
5.96% |
12
|
  
|
23 |
15.23% |
13
|
  
|
14 |
9.27% |
14
|
  
|
11 |
7.28% |
09-07-2010, 01:23 PM
|
#101
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Bowness
|
Ward 1 here.
My only issue has to do with City Council cancelling a petitioned road improvement at third reading for the road I live on. There was no warning and I haven't yet heard an acceptable explanation for why it happened. There are so many unpaved roads in Bowness that it unfairly reinforces the negative perception about this community and I want it changed.
|
|
|
09-07-2010, 01:39 PM
|
#102
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bizaro86
That would imply ATCO doesn't own that land. Is it owned by the Feds as well?
|
I'm pretty sure it is, if I'm thinking of the right site. Could someone point out the Atco site in question? Address or Google Maps link.
|
|
|
09-07-2010, 01:41 PM
|
#103
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bizaro86
That would imply ATCO doesn't own that land. Is it owned by the Feds as well?
|
http://www.calgaryinfrastructure.ca/...s_696-WMA.html this link shows that the are rezoning the area and that whatever is going to be built there will be completed in 2015.
EDIT: Kind of a neat website
|
|
|
09-07-2010, 01:43 PM
|
#104
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Vancouver
|
link
Can see it partially from 50th ave also
|
|
|
09-07-2010, 01:48 PM
|
#105
|
First Line Centre
|
^Land owned by the City of Calgary, so far as I can determine.
As for the website, it is neat and informative, but not entirely complete.
|
|
|
09-07-2010, 04:39 PM
|
#106
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Trapped in my own code!!
|
Ward 5
Big issues for me are the airport tunnel and the overpass at 16th and 68th. I could add improving the piss poor NE C-Train line, but I know that will never happen.
|
|
|
09-07-2010, 04:42 PM
|
#107
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Bowness
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze
That is weird, never understood why there were those unpaved Bowness roads. Assumed it was some jursdiction issue, like that area that backs onto crowchild near Dalhousie that isn't actually city land and has water wells etc.
There were also raods in Pumphill servicing 7 digit homes that were unpaved. Weird.
|
I heard that they were supposed to have been paved as part of the town annexation agreement but that the city decided to make the owners pay by forcing them to hold improvement plebecites. The thing is, we did that, it was accepted and passed 1st and 2nd reading at council before a group of alderpeople voted it down. I'm waiting to hear back from Dale Hodges as to his thoughts on the situation before I do my best to work against him.
|
|
|
09-07-2010, 04:49 PM
|
#108
|
tromboner
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by longsuffering
Yeah! Damn Indians exercising their democratic rights. Let's teach 'em a lesson! 
|
You forgot the part where the "inherent rights" they get (like tax-free casionos!) are inherently undemocratic.
Excluding the casino makes sense to me... if they vote to play hardball, the city should play hardball too. They're the NHLPA in this situation. Yes, you have the right to vote on a proposed deal, but if you don't want to accept reasonable, affordable compensation, you get locked out. There's no reason for the city to give up a bargaining chip without getting something back.
Last edited by SebC; 09-07-2010 at 05:20 PM.
|
|
|
09-07-2010, 04:51 PM
|
#109
|
tromboner
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kerplunk
I could add improving the piss poor NE C-Train line, but I know that will never happen.
|
Elaborate please?
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to SebC For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-07-2010, 05:03 PM
|
#110
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Memento Mori
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SebC
You forgot the part where the "inherent rights" they get (like tax-free casionos!) are inherently undemocratic.
Excluding the casion makes sense to me... if they vote to play hardball, the city should play hardball too. They're the NHLPA in this situation. Yes, you have the right to vote on a proposed deal, but if you don't want to accept reasonable, affordable compensation, you get locked out. There's no reason for the city to give up a bargaining chip without getting something back.
|
Sometimes I wish that when the whities landed in the New World, the natives would've greeted them with phasers.
__________________
If you don't pass this sig to ten of your friends, you will become an Oilers fan.
|
|
|
09-07-2010, 05:06 PM
|
#111
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SebC
Elaborate please?
|
Also interested.
|
|
|
09-07-2010, 05:36 PM
|
#112
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in your blind spot.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SebC
Elaborate please?
|
I would guess trying to alleviate the mayhem that occurs along 36th.
I've sat at one of those lights trying to get on 36th during rush hour and watched 3 trains go by before I could get through (seeing 3 in one cycle is rare, but 2 just timed to not quite let the light change seems common). And you would think that might help traffic along 36th to clear out, but it doesn't because the turning lanes at the lights fill up (especially into Sunridge (NB) and 36th SB onto EB 16th) and plug one of the through lanes, so now you have 2 lanes squeezing into one. Throw a bus or two along there (anywhere along 36th where there is no bus turnout) and it really does suck.
The city seems to have learned those lessons on the new lines, but the original problems still exist along the original stretch.
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Bobblehead For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-07-2010, 06:46 PM
|
#114
|
One of the Nine
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by frinkprof
^Land owned by the City of Calgary, so far as I can determine.
As for the website, it is neat and informative, but not entirely complete.
|
The City owns that land? Well then what the hell is their excuse for the ridiculous "interchange" at 50th. Specifically the left turn from EB 50th to get to SB Crow?
I sincerely hope that it is temporary, since the loop needs to exist for the WB 50th traffic, and that a direct lane will be carved in after the City retakes control of the land.
Seeing some mixed use in there, rather than that ugly 70s warehouse district, would make me a happy guy. The only crappy thing about the area is how congested the Crow to Glenmore flyover already is during peak times. Not to mention NB Crow at Bow and at Kensington.
|
|
|
09-07-2010, 07:28 PM
|
#115
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 4X4
The City owns that land? Well then what the hell is their excuse for the ridiculous "interchange" at 50th. Specifically the left turn from EB 50th to get to SB Crow?
I sincerely hope that it is temporary, since the loop needs to exist for the WB 50th traffic, and that a direct lane will be carved in after the City retakes control of the land.
|
It appears there are actually 3 different parcels of interest in there. A parcel was subdivided from land formerly owned by the federal crown in the late 60s, and conveyed to the City of Calgary, who intended for (it would appear) there to be a huge widening of 50th plus room for an interchange ramp there on the SW corner of the intersection. 50th Avenue was actually at one time planned to be a huge freeway.
However, the freeway never happened. In two separate road closure bylaws in 2001 and 2004, those roads rights of way (which were never built) were closed. The City still owns the land though.
Black: Lands leased by Atco, owned by City of Calgary
Green: Originally part of 1969 road plan, closed by bylaw in 2004, owned by City of Calgary
Blue: Originally part of 1969 road plan, closed by bylaw in 2001, not sure on ownership. Pretty sure it is MRU.
I'm not really sure this answers your question though. Suffice to say though that 50th Ave. has a bit of history to it.
Last edited by frinkprof; 09-07-2010 at 07:50 PM.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to frinkprof For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-29-2010, 11:14 PM
|
#116
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Calgary
|
Bringing back an old thread to let the 5 people in Ward 4 know I will be doing a demon dial message tomorrow.
Feel free to flame away. Actually, I think it is a very informative message and I hope it will generally well received.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:55 PM.
|
|