07-30-2009, 03:15 PM
|
#101
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Interesting spin Mr. Redneck
|
|
|
07-30-2009, 03:44 PM
|
#103
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Moscow, ID
|
Mikey, what do the Illuminati think of global warming? God knows they take up a lot of energy staying illuminated. But how much and will there be caps on their emissions? You have any links about that?
|
|
|
07-30-2009, 03:52 PM
|
#105
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Lethbridge
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Weiser Wonder
Mikey, what do the Illuminati think of global warming? God knows they take up a lot of energy staying illuminated. But how much and will there be caps on their emissions? You have any links about that?
|
What are you talking about? It's Al Gores' thing........
I don't know much about the Illuminti.
Nice try though........trying to pile on makes you look foolish.
|
|
|
07-30-2009, 04:39 PM
|
#106
|
Not a casual user
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: A simple man leading a complicated life....
|
__________________
|
|
|
07-30-2009, 06:25 PM
|
#107
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikey_the_redneck
Don't know what you mean here exaclty....
|
Well to spell it out for you, he's saying your endorsement of Azure's post doesn't help it, in fact it hurts it, because your credibility has been ruined for most people on this board because of your comments in threads like the Zeitgeist one.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikey_the_redneck
Nice try though........trying to pile on makes you look foolish.
|
I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that the people in this thread that most posters think are looking foolish are you and Tower.
Almost every time you post something it makes you look even more foolish or stupid than before. IMO anyways. And I know I'm not the only one...
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-30-2009, 06:34 PM
|
#108
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mykalberta
Does Federal law actually govern roads in the US? Isnt it up to individ states to inact those laws? Or do I now know what a union of states is?
Last I checked it was up to state law makers to enact those laws hence why there are differing ages in different states for drinking, driving age etc. Much like in Canada.
|
Yes, its upto the individual states. Thats why the no texting/talking on the cell phone is ALREADY a law in some states in California (and New York and Im not sure where else) while not a law in other states (like Nevada, Kentucky, Florida to name a few).
|
|
|
07-30-2009, 09:12 PM
|
#109
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Lethbridge
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher
I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that the people in this thread that most posters think are looking foolish are you and Tower.
Almost every time you post something it makes you look even more foolish or stupid than before. IMO anyways. And I know I'm not the only one...
|
Well, Tower hasn't even posted in this thread, and besides I have no idea what Tower is talking about half the time......
I could give a crap what anyone here thinks of my posts really. I stand by my belief that 9/11 was an inside job, and facilitated by the ruling class of America. Will we ever know the truth? I don't know......but false flag events have taken place in the past. There are questions abound that have not been answered and no investigation has taken place. They swept it under the carpet fairly quickly and kicked their foreign policy into high gear.
I dont mind getting piled on. If you have a belief that goes against the grain, that will happen, but when additional posters come out of knowhere (like weiser wonder) to do a drive-by insult, it is just pathetic really. Especially when they bring it up in an un-related thread. There is a gang mentality around here sometimes............but most of you play it safe and just like to pick apart someone elses ideas. Thats fine...........but I see right through it. I'm stickin with my guns.
My credibility has been ruined!.........you dont say?! What will I do without the approval of anonymous message board posters?!
|
|
|
07-31-2009, 11:03 AM
|
#110
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In front of the Photon Torpedo
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher
Well to spell it out for you, he's saying your endorsement of Azure's post doesn't help it, in fact it hurts it, because your credibility has been ruined for most people on this board because of your comments in threads like the Zeitgeist one.
I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that the people in this thread that most posters think are looking foolish are you and Tower.
Almost every time you post something it makes you look even more foolish or stupid than before. IMO anyways. And I know I'm not the only one...
|
Ha ha ha... My life is not up to you, and I hardly care what you or anyone thinks of me.
Mikey,
Yes it can get confusing.
Basically, in order to be governed under Common Law you must have mutual consent. Unless you gave your consent it is only ignorance that has control of you. No contract... No Government. So even a silly Act like this really has no power. It's Acting like a law, but only has force of one by consenting people. That is the gist. Don't consent. However I will not continue talking about this and derail the thread. Just pointing out how this type of law wouldn't matter to those who choose not to be governed.
|
|
|
07-31-2009, 11:06 AM
|
#111
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tower
Ha ha ha... My life is not up to you, and I hardly care what you or anyone thinks of me.
Mikey,
Yes it can get confusing.
Basically, in order to be governed under Common Law you must have mutual consent. Unless you gave your consent it is only ignorance that has control of you. No contract... No Government. So even a silly Act like this really has no power. It's Acting like a law, but only has force of one by consenting people. That is the gist. Don't consent. However I will not continue talking about this and derail the thread. Just pointing out how this type of law wouldn't matter to those who choose not to be governed.
|
Send money now!
|
|
|
01-11-2012, 12:20 PM
|
#113
|
Franchise Player
|
I first thought the fines were too high, but upon reading about what he was doing and what could have happened, I have no sympathy.
Quote:
The sirens and flashing lights? That means put away the cell phone and pull over. A 24-year-old from Gatineau, Quebec learned that the hard way after he was pulled over by police outside of Ottawa.
The young man, who failed to notice the officers because he was texting, was fined over $2,300, reports the Ottawa Sun.
The man was driving down highway 307 around 11 p.m. January 6, driving so erratically police initially thought he was impaired. The police watched the man narrowly avoid a head-on collision while passing cars at speeds of up to 90 km/h.
Officers had to pull up next to the car to get his attention and wave him to the side of the road.
|
http://autos.sympatico.ca/auto-news/12908/quebec-driver-fined-2-300-for-texting-while-driving
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:27 AM.
|
|