Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Where will the Flames finish in the overall standings in the 24/25 season?
32 6 1.99%
31 4 1.32%
30 50 16.56%
29 52 17.22%
28 58 19.21%
27 42 13.91%
26 25 8.28%
25 20 6.62%
24 6 1.99%
23rd or better 39 12.91%
Voters: 302. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-10-2024, 04:12 PM   #101
GullFoss
#1 Goaltender
 
GullFoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
Also, from everything I have heard when I look at the big picture this is absolutely not a rebuild. Maybe it should be but I think Conroy is going to deal a lot of that draft capital and other moves to get this team back in the playoffs as soon as possible. He won't use it on old aging vets but I expect he is going to bring in young pieces ready to contribute now. Everything I have heard indicates ownership wants a quick turnaround back to the playoffs.
That can be the plan, but this team lacks the talent and cap space to retool in any short order. Their franchise player is a replacement quality player and they have many pending UFAs next year. I could actually see them as the worst team in the league in 2025-26.
GullFoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to GullFoss For This Useful Post:
Old 03-10-2024, 04:19 PM   #102
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

My problem with the Flames thinking they could acquire an elite long-term piece (centre or a defenceman) by trading a couple of late 1st round picks or other similarly valued trade chips is that the team that is giving up on that 22-24 year old thinks that he won't become that elite player. I don't know if I believe that the Flames think they can acquire a new core this way.

That's not to say you can't go out and win trades, but I think the Flames need to have faith in their amateur scouts. This is an organization that should be approaching draft capital similar to Carolina. This team should truly try to pick as many times over the next two to three drafts as possible.

If you can't have that kind of faith in your scouts to rely on them in times like these, nothing really matters then.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Ashasx For This Useful Post:
Old 03-10-2024, 04:23 PM   #103
TheScorpion
First round-bust
 
TheScorpion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: speculating about AHL players
Exp:
Default

Back to reality.
__________________
Need a great deal on a new or pre-owned car? Come see me at Platinum Mitsubishi — 2720 Barlow Trail NE

TheScorpion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2024, 05:16 PM   #104
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GullFoss View Post
That can be the plan, but this team lacks the talent and cap space to retool in any short order. Their franchise player is a replacement quality player and they have many pending UFAs next year. I could actually see them as the worst team in the league in 2025-26.
The team will have plenty of cap space and there is no way they are outsucking the other bottom feeders. There is no way I can see them even top 5 bottom next year.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2024, 05:17 PM   #105
btimbit
Franchise Player
 
btimbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: St. George's, Grenada
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion View Post
Back to reality.
Oh, there goes gravity
btimbit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2024, 05:21 PM   #106
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
The team will have plenty of cap space and there is no way they are outsucking the other bottom feeders. There is no way I can see them even top 5 bottom next year.
How do you figure?

What players are keeping them above that?
ComixZone is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ComixZone For This Useful Post:
Old 03-10-2024, 05:31 PM   #107
GranteedEV
Franchise Player
 
GranteedEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
My problem with the Flames thinking they could acquire an elite long-term piece (centre or a defenceman) by trading a couple of late 1st round picks or other similarly valued trade chips is that the team that is giving up on that 22-24 year old thinks that he won't become that elite player. I don't know if I believe that the Flames think they can acquire a new core this way.

That's not to say you can't go out and win trades, but I think the Flames need to have faith in their amateur scouts. This is an organization that should be approaching draft capital similar to Carolina. This team should truly try to pick as many times over the next two to three drafts as possible.

If you can't have that kind of faith in your scouts to rely on them in times like these, nothing really matters then.
Yup. About the only time a real franchise quality center has been traded in the last decade, maybe two decades is Jack Eichel. That's basically the entire list. You might get a William Karlsson or Elias Lindholm type if you're lucky, but the draft - and high in the draft at that - is where this team needs to look.
__________________

"May those who accept their fate find happiness. May those who defy it find glory."
GranteedEV is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to GranteedEV For This Useful Post:
Old 03-10-2024, 05:36 PM   #108
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by traptor View Post
This has been fleshed out alot but theres a key difference in having a player drafted top-3, which almost every team has including the flames, verse having a player that you've drafted top 3.


The only teams to win the cup in the last decade without having a top-3 picked player that they draft are:

Blues (had pietrangelo though, they drafted 4th oa)
Golden knights (recent expansion team)


If you go back 20 years to 2004 you can throw in bruins, ducks and wings.

So 2/10 last 10 years and 5/20 cup teams didn't have a top 3 player they drafted.
If you change it to a top 5 player they drafted that number is further reduced by half.
It’s also not just about the one top 3 pick. Yeah, that guy needs to be a player, but if you’re bad enough to draft top-3 one year, you’re probably going to be bad enough to draft at least top-10 the next year, and you probably weren’t drafting in the 20s last year.

If you have three drafts of high-ish picks, three trade deadlines of selling UFAs for picks and prospects, that lays the foundation for a decade of successful hockey.

Zary, Coronato, Pelletier and Honzek are the depth players that will lift our next generation of superstars - they aren’t the superstars themselves.

By the time the new building opens, Conroy will likely have added 15-25 assets through prudence alone.

Of course it makes sense to add a good young roster player for a 1st and two 2nds. You can do that when you have six 1st rounders over the next three years with 12 UFAs on bargain contracts.

But a team needs superstars. This team doesn’t have any, but I do believe we’ll have one in the fold on draft night.
GreenLantern2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2024, 06:00 PM   #109
Finger Cookin
Franchise Player
 
Finger Cookin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Exp:
Default

No need to worry about drafting 15th or 16th this year, we're heading for the top 10
Finger Cookin is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Finger Cookin For This Useful Post:
Old 03-10-2024, 06:05 PM   #110
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Finger Cookin View Post
No need to worry about drafting 15th or 16th this year, we're heading for the top 10
At least two of Buffalo, St. Louis, Pittsburgh, and New Jersey would need to pass us to get into the top 10. The teams below that are likely too far gone to overtake the Flames at this point.

I expect the Flames to draft 10-12 when all is said and done.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."

Last edited by FlamesAddiction; 03-10-2024 at 06:21 PM.
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2024, 06:14 PM   #111
Aarongavey
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
The team will have plenty of cap space and there is no way they are outsucking the other bottom feeders. There is no way I can see them even top 5 bottom next year.
If they move Markstrom it could be a real possibility. Of the teams currently behind them it is definitely plausible that Ottawa, Montreal, Buffalo, New Jersey and Pittsburgh are better than the Flames over 82 games next year. If Arizona or Columbus gets a few pieces the Flames could be bottom five. Bottom 7 is more likely.

San Jose likely has the worst team wrapped up and I don’t see Anaheim or Chicago being significantly better next year.

A lot depends on what happens over the summer. If Kadri asks to get out at the end of the year and Markstrom actually gets out it is hard to imagine the Flames replacing them let alone all the other guys who left this year.
Aarongavey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2024, 06:15 PM   #112
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
The team will have plenty of cap space and there is no way they are outsucking the other bottom feeders. There is no way I can see them even top 5 bottom next year.
Teams like Chicago will start to improve, as they have strong prospect base, and a ton of draft picks, including a premium one coming up.

At some stage they will pass Calgary as Calgary drops.

Without a Vezina type goalie, the flames might be really bad. Maybe not #1 bad, but they might be #5 bad.

Although I am likely just reading too much into the last 2 games, they were bad. Let’s see how they play at home.
The Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2024, 06:25 PM   #113
FanIn80
GOAT!
 
FanIn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FanIn80 View Post
John Bean: "Don't call it a rebuild. "

Craig Conroy: "...but the next three years will be nothin but tears, puttin prospects in fear while their peers reign on 'em like a monsoon..."
LL Cool J used to be hip...

FanIn80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2024, 06:38 PM   #114
AustinL_NHL
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
The team will have plenty of cap space and there is no way they are outsucking the other bottom feeders. There is no way I can see them even top 5 bottom next year.
They were possibly headed for a top 10 pick before they traded their #1C, #3D, #4D, #5D and are still likely headed for a top 10 pick before trading away their Vezina-caliber-playing goaltender this offseason. Plus the likelihood of shipping out another top 9 player in Mangiapane, who apparently wouldn't mind a change of scenery.

Being bottom 5 shouldn't be too hard.

If they're smart, they'll use all that cap space to take in bad 1-2 year contracts and acquire more significant assets as they build a quality team/prospect base heading into the new arena.
AustinL_NHL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2024, 06:42 PM   #115
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

I will believe it when I see it, I just don't see this team bottoming out.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2024, 06:51 PM   #116
Goriders
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goriders View Post
I don’t think they are going to trade anyone else minus cleaning up the goaltending situation. They will have a ton of cap space in the offseason and they have loaded up on picks and prospects.

My guess is they will be looking for a center and a defenceman and they will start trying to compete again. They will probably try to get one of those players via the goalie cleanup.

Markstrom for a young center would make sense.
Forget what I said. First overall pick is in play for next year
Goriders is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2024, 06:56 PM   #117
Jason14h
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
I will believe it when I see it, I just don't see this team bottoming out.
A team lead by Kadri , Huberdeau and Anderson is easily bottom 5

There are very few impact UFAs available , and we don’t have blue chip prospects.. Yet

How this team isn’t bottom 5 next year is the real question for me
Jason14h is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2024, 06:59 PM   #118
TrentCrimmIndependent
Franchise Player
 
TrentCrimmIndependent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Richmond upon Thames, London
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy View Post
Go look at the upcoming UFA list.

I don't see anyone on there that you'd actually want to give a big contract to and/or would pick Calgary over other suitors.
Like others I haven't taken the time to look because I've been far too focused on the TDL until a day ago.

That's too bad. Pat mentioned giving Barrie a shot - likely just to headman the PP.

Anything is better than the current setup
TrentCrimmIndependent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2024, 07:01 PM   #119
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason14h View Post
A team lead by Kadri , Huberdeau and Anderson is easily bottom 5

There are very few impact UFAs available , and we don’t have blue chip prospects.. Yet

How this team isn’t bottom 5 next year is the real question for me
No it isn't, there are worse rosters for sure. I think this is just the rebuild crowd in denial wanting the team to bottom out fully. I don't see it happening.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2024, 07:03 PM   #120
Saqe
#1 Goaltender
 
Saqe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Exp:
Default

Trade Markstrom and you'll probably finish bottom five.

This team should really utilize cap space next year and take other teams' bad contracts for additional first round picks.
Saqe is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Saqe For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:01 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy