Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-03-2022, 01:38 PM   #101
activeStick
Franchise Player
 
activeStick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Burke was on the Eric Francis show and said he lost 6 lbs coming into camp this year to get quicker. Works hard and skates well. Thinks it's a good pickup for the Flames and they would have preferred that the Pens kept him.
activeStick is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to activeStick For This Useful Post:
Old 10-03-2022, 01:45 PM   #102
stemit14
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

It would be pretty funny to see a line of Lucic-Ruzicka-Zohorna. Doubt there’s been many NHL lines that big before.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
stemit14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2022, 01:49 PM   #103
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
It wasn't the move he was looking for, therefore it was a bad move.
Did I say it was a bad move? No. So piss off. But put in context of not moving Lucic, signing Rooney, Lewis, and Ritchie, Having Ruzicka in a waivers situation and probably having to keep him, and having Eakins in camp and performing the best of the 4th liners, this seems like a redundant move. It is a strange move considering the obvious shortcomings.
Lanny_McDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2022, 01:52 PM   #104
#-3
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Exp:
Default

I have the Flames sitting at $1,161,667 in space, counting Ritchie/Kylington out and Zary/Mackey in.

Those two are the most expensive existing contracts in the mix for a roster spot opening day, I think if they sign anyone else (Stone or Eakin...) they will come in cheaper than Zary/Mackey so the opening day cap space could be a little higher.
#-3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2022, 01:52 PM   #105
Oil Stain
Franchise Player
 
Oil Stain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Exp:
Default

Intriguing pickup. Has decent production in limited minutes.

I predict a portion of the fan base is going to be riding him hard because he's 6'6" and doesn't put someone through the boards on every shift.
Oil Stain is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Oil Stain For This Useful Post:
Old 10-03-2022, 01:53 PM   #106
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stemit14 View Post
It would be pretty funny to see a line of Lucic-Ruzicka-Zohorna. Doubt there’s been many NHL lines that big before.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Throw in Zadorov and Hanifin or Meloche or Stone on D.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2022, 01:54 PM   #107
gvitaly
Franchise Player
 
gvitaly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanny_McDonald View Post
Did I say it was a bad move? No. So piss off. But put in context of not moving Lucic, signing Rooney, Lewis, and Ritchie, Having Ruzicka in a waivers situation and probably having to keep him, and having Eakins in camp and performing the best of the 4th liners, this seems like a redundant move. It is a strange move considering the obvious shortcomings.
I don't see any shortcomings because you can still waive Zohorna if he doesn't outperform any of the 4th liners. In the worst case scenario you get an extra body for a week of camp, then PIT claims him back and assigns him to the minors.
gvitaly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2022, 02:00 PM   #108
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Where did Flames stand in waiver picking order?
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2022, 02:04 PM   #109
Reggie Dunlop
All I can get
 
Reggie Dunlop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Big Zad

Big Rad
Reggie Dunlop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2022, 02:06 PM   #110
DoubleK
Franchise Player
 
DoubleK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Seattle, WA/Scottsdale, AZ
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gvitaly View Post
I don't see any shortcomings because you can still waive Zohorna if he doesn't outperform any of the 4th liners. In the worst case scenario you get an extra body for a week of camp, then PIT claims him back and assigns him to the minors.
He'd still have to clear waivers to go to Wilkes-Barre
__________________
It's only game. Why you heff to be mad?
DoubleK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2022, 02:11 PM   #111
CSharp
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reggie Dunlop View Post
Big Zad

Big Rad
That should make one Zohorna!
CSharp is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CSharp For This Useful Post:
Old 10-03-2022, 02:12 PM   #112
powderjunkie
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by activeStick View Post
Burke was on the Eric Francis show and said he lost 6 lbs
Good for Burkie.
powderjunkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2022, 02:16 PM   #113
taxbuster
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanny_McDonald View Post
I agree with this. I get the team got pushed into a corner by Gaudreau and Tkachuk, but this team really is poorly constructed IMO. I just don't see where players fit, and we keep adding from the bottom up rather than trying to move a player in with some skill and push players top down. I see the pair thing sort of working, but the third player on each of the lines is so uncomplimentary I don't see how they're going to benefit the main pair? This keeps getting weirder and weirder.
Because players at the top grow on trees?

You can ONLY add from the bottom at the beginning of the year unless you're willing to make (yet) another trade. I have no problem with that. The skill at the top end is *supposed* to be high enough that they can figure out how to play together.

Do give them a while to do that.
__________________
Hey...where'd my avatar go?
taxbuster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2022, 02:23 PM   #114
Paulie Walnuts
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
Where did Flames stand in waiver picking order?
I think waivers is determined by standing from the previous season, so I think we would be at the bottom.

This pick up is strange, it seems like they are stockpiling on bottom line players. As long as this boots Eakin out of the lineup.

Making the claim makes no sense otherwise.
Paulie Walnuts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2022, 02:24 PM   #115
gvitaly
Franchise Player
 
gvitaly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleK View Post
He'd still have to clear waivers to go to Wilkes-Barre
I believe he will be going to Wilkes-Barre unless multiple teams submitted waiver claims on this go around. Since there were only 5 teams with lower waiver priority than the Flames I don't think it's likely there were multiple claims submitted. I could be wrong on that one though.
gvitaly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2022, 02:31 PM   #116
DoubleK
Franchise Player
 
DoubleK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Seattle, WA/Scottsdale, AZ
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gvitaly View Post
I could be wrong on that one though.
I could be wrong too, maybe Scorpion or Sure loss knows better.
__________________
It's only game. Why you heff to be mad?
DoubleK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2022, 02:33 PM   #117
agulati
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by #-3 View Post
I have the Flames sitting at $1,161,667 in space, counting Ritchie/Kylington out and Zary/Mackey in.

Those two are the most expensive existing contracts in the mix for a roster spot opening day, I think if they sign anyone else (Stone or Eakin...) they will come in cheaper than Zary/Mackey so the opening day cap space could be a little higher.
Wouldn’t Kylington still count against the cap though?
agulati is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2022, 02:37 PM   #118
activeStick
Franchise Player
 
activeStick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
Where did Flames stand in waiver picking order?
6th last, so 20 teams chose to not make a claim before the Flames did
activeStick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2022, 02:39 PM   #119
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by agulati View Post
Wouldn’t Kylington still count against the cap though?
We'll see what happens when the season opens. If he is taking an extended leave of absence, the team might suspend him.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2022, 02:46 PM   #120
topfiverecords
Franchise Player
 
topfiverecords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleK View Post
I could be wrong too, maybe Scorpion or Sure loss knows better.
...

Quote:
Originally Posted by getbak View Post
He failed to clear waivers, so if the Flames want to send him to the AHL at any point this season, he will need to clear waivers first.

At that point, any team can put in a claim, but if Pittsburgh puts in a successful claim, and is the only team that puts in a claim, the Pens would be able to send him to the AHL without putting him on waivers again.

He is in the final year of a two-year contract that pays league-minimum and will be a UFA next summer.
topfiverecords is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to topfiverecords For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:18 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy