Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-07-2020, 08:15 PM   #101
Husky
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Exp:
Default

I have no issue with ryan centering the 3rd line. Not flashy. But quietly gets the job done.
Husky is offline  
Old 10-07-2020, 08:17 PM   #102
MrMike
Franchise Player
 
MrMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Van Island
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by husky View Post
i have no issue with ryan centering the 3rd line. Not flashy. But quietly gets the job done.
Bennett!!!!!
MrMike is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to MrMike For This Useful Post:
Old 10-07-2020, 10:07 PM   #103
topfiverecords
Franchise Player
 
topfiverecords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Winsor_Pilates View Post
Vancouver radio guys saying the Oilers are going hard for Markstrom. That would suck
Going hard with a 7x$3M + DVDs + West Ed Pool passes + Smith’s used gear + use of Gene’s tanning bed + playing with McDavid + beat up lived in Ice District condo
topfiverecords is offline  
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to topfiverecords For This Useful Post:
Old 10-08-2020, 07:39 AM   #104
Futzee
Farm Team Player
 
Futzee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I don't want him if he comes with a NMC. We have enough to figure out with protections for the Seattle draft. Let's not lose another piece to add an expensive risky goalie on a long term deal.
Futzee is offline  
Old 10-08-2020, 07:42 AM   #105
868904
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Futzee View Post
I don't want him if he comes with a NMC. We have enough to figure out with protections for the Seattle draft. Let's not lose another piece to add an expensive risky goalie on a long term deal.
How is this even an issue for the Flames? I thought goalies are counted separately and not included in the protection list for skaters?
__________________
Calgary Flames, PLEASE GO TO THE NET! AND SHOOT THE PUCK! GENERATING OFFENSE IS NOT DIFFICULT! SKATE HARD, SHOOT HARD, CRASH THE NET HARD!
868904 is offline  
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to 868904 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-08-2020, 07:47 AM   #106
btimbit
Franchise Player
 
btimbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: St. George's, Grenada
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 868904 View Post
How is this even an issue for the Flames? I thought goalies are counted separately and not included in the protection list for skaters?
Agreed. If the expansion draft was farther away then maybe, but as it stands, we'd be protecting our newly signed UFA goalie with or without an NMC

I'd like to avoid an NMC in principal, but if that becomes the difference between getting him at a good price vs having to overpay or not get it at all, then give it to him
btimbit is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to btimbit For This Useful Post:
Old 10-08-2020, 07:50 AM   #107
868904
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

If you are worried about term and how Markstrom will age, then the best bet for an elite goalie is Kuemper, who has two more years at a good cap hit. But there is an asset cost to acquire and you are playing this goalie carousel game again soon; however, at least the timing fits with the current core and fully establishes the two year win window.

Ideally, the Canucks trade for OEL has Demko as the centrepiece and the Canucks re-sign Markstrom. With Demko in the fold, Arizona is more inclined to just let Kuemper go a little cheaper.

Honestly, I’d be ok with trading a decent asset right now like Mangiapane for Kuemper. I’m not sure the Flames would be able to keep Mangiapane long term anyways. I’m less inclined to trade the 2021 first because that could be a long term asset for the Flames.
__________________
Calgary Flames, PLEASE GO TO THE NET! AND SHOOT THE PUCK! GENERATING OFFENSE IS NOT DIFFICULT! SKATE HARD, SHOOT HARD, CRASH THE NET HARD!
868904 is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to 868904 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-08-2020, 07:51 AM   #108
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Burke on the radio thinks that Markstrom is going to leave Vancouver because they simply can’t guarantee he gets protected in the expansion draft. He also thinks Markstrom signs somewhere tomorrow.

Apparently on TSN radio in Edmonton the Oilers are going to offer 6-7 year term but not as much AAV. Flames have the ability to go term and money so that should put us as the front runner.


Burke also mentioned out of all his NHL stops he liked living in Calgary the most and did a nice sell job for why it is such a great city to live in
Vinny01 is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Vinny01 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-08-2020, 07:52 AM   #109
btimbit
Franchise Player
 
btimbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: St. George's, Grenada
Exp:
Default

Kuemper is my #1 choice as well, but that said I'm not up to date on the the cost/asking price needed to get him
btimbit is offline  
Old 10-08-2020, 07:53 AM   #110
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 868904 View Post
If you are worried about term and how Markstrom will age, then the best bet for an elite goalie is Kuemper, who has two more years at a good cap hit. But there is an asset cost to acquire and you are playing this goalie carousel game again soon; however, at least the timing fits with the current core and fully establishes the two year win window.

Ideally, the Canucks trade for OEL has Demko as the centrepiece and the Canucks re-sign Markstrom. With Demko in the fold, Arizona is more inclined to just let Kuemper go a little cheaper.

Honestly, I’d be ok with trading a decent asset right now like Mangiapane for Kuemper. I’m not sure the Flames would be able to keep Mangiapane long term anyways. I’m less inclined to trade the 2021 first because that could be a long term asset for the Flames.
I would rather have a long term goalie and keep Mangipane then kick the can down the road for 2 years and pay a price like Mang to get Kuemper for 2 Years.
Vinny01 is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Vinny01 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-08-2020, 08:48 AM   #111
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Pinder seems to think the Flames are in on Markstrom and he would want to play here.

Boomer taking the pessimistic approach they are looking at Talbot and Markstrom won’t come here. Boomer does want a goalie he thinks the Flames will go with a cheap tandem again.
Vinny01 is offline  
Old 10-08-2020, 08:51 AM   #112
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

I get what Boomer is saying. Treliving has been content paying for league average goaltending. It hasn't been concern #1 even though it should be.

But Pinder is right this time. This guy has been the Canucks MVP and he's probably going to be worth the money. You know how well he plays, you see him a lot, the team should know all they need to know and should make every effort to bring him in.
Toonage is offline  
Old 10-08-2020, 08:57 AM   #113
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toonage View Post
I get what Boomer is saying. Treliving has been content paying for league average goaltending. It hasn't been concern #1 even though it should be.

But Pinder is right this time. This guy has been the Canucks MVP and he's probably going to be worth the money. You know how well he plays, you see him a lot, the team should know all they need to know and should make every effort to bring him in.
Yeah, Pinder is right but I think Boom is just playing the role of pessimistic Flames fan, and really...I get it.

It’s really hard to believe that things will actually go well for this team in the next week or so, because they haven’t in 2+ years. There’s just been no improvement, so why is that going to change? Then specifically on the goaltending front, this GM has had 6 years and has done nothing but cycle in crap goalies that let the team down in the end...but he keeps doing it, so why should we have hope that he’ll do anything but the same thing again this year?

Look for your goalie, but do not trust to hope. It has forsaken these lands.
ComixZone is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to ComixZone For This Useful Post:
Old 10-08-2020, 09:03 AM   #114
undercoverbrother
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sylvan Lake
Exp:
Default

Dear Markstrom

__________________
Captain James P. DeCOSTE, CD, 18 Sep 1993

Corporal Jean-Marc H. BECHARD, 6 Aug 1993
undercoverbrother is offline  
Old 10-08-2020, 09:06 AM   #115
Crown Royal
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toonage View Post
I get what Boomer is saying. Treliving has been content paying for league average goaltending. It hasn't been concern #1 even though it should be.

But Pinder is right this time. This guy has been the Canucks MVP and he's probably going to be worth the money. You know how well he plays, you see him a lot, the team should know all they need to know and should make every effort to bring him in.
If Treliving has always been so content, why is he always seeking a goaltender?

Content is defined as being in a state of peaceful happiness, with him constantly looking for goalies that tells me he is the opposite of content.
Crown Royal is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Crown Royal For This Useful Post:
Old 10-08-2020, 09:08 AM   #116
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crown Royal View Post
If Treliving has always been so content, why is he always seeking a goaltender?

Content is defined as being in a state of peaceful happiness, with him constantly looking for goalies that tells me he is the opposite of content.
May have been a poor choice of words. Tell me which you would prefer and I'll note it.
Toonage is offline  
Old 10-08-2020, 09:09 AM   #117
agulati
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

I share the opinion of some other posters. I’d prefer Holtby over Markstrom as a UFA. This obviously depends on the term/salary that is offered to Markstrom, but there is a good chance that Markstrom gets overpaid comes Friday. In that case we should move on to Holtby.
agulati is offline  
Old 10-08-2020, 09:11 AM   #118
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

the thing with the Oilers rumor is the Flames can outbid them on AAV and can go long term as well. The Flames also have been the better team and have his good buddy Lindholm. The mountains and nicer city should clearly make Calgary the favorite over Edmonton.

Burke on the radio this morning based on the people he talked to thinks Markstrom gets to free agency as they can’t agree on the expansion protection.
Vinny01 is offline  
Old 10-08-2020, 09:12 AM   #119
Tbull8
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone View Post
Yeah, Pinder is right but I think Boom is just playing the role of pessimistic Flames fan, and really...I get it.

It’s really hard to believe that things will actually go well for this team in the next week or so, because they haven’t in 2+ years. There’s just been no improvement, so why is that going to change? Then specifically on the goaltending front, this GM has had 6 years and has done nothing but cycle in crap goalies that let the team down in the end...but he keeps doing it, so why should we have hope that he’ll do anything but the same thing again this year?

Look for your goalie, but do not trust to hope. It has forsaken these lands.
Ok Eomer, I see you
Tbull8 is offline  
Old 10-08-2020, 09:13 AM   #120
Crown Royal
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toonage View Post
May have been a poor choice of words. Tell me which you would prefer and I'll note it.
I'd say he settled because the cost for the guys he wanted was far too high, for example in the rumored Bishop and Fleury deals, they wanted our 2016 first round pick. Or in other cases like Andersen, the other team didn't want to move the player within the division.

The only goalie we could have gotten that he was in on was Talbot, but we traded for Hamilton instead.
Crown Royal is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Crown Royal For This Useful Post:
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:46 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy