Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-11-2018, 03:35 PM   #101
RM14
First Line Centre
 
RM14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dieHARDflameZ View Post
Do you actually believe this? Rumours out there are that it's been dead silence for a while now.
Yes I actually believe this. Deadly silent since the NDA.
RM14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2018, 03:36 PM   #102
Bunk
Franchise Player
 
Bunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JBR View Post
Read the report again. It is not costing the city $3B
Indeed. It'll be something like $550m-$600m. And that allocation will likely be on a lot of the stuff like the field house and housing that we'd likely want to do anyway here locally.

A "matching" by the feds of the mun/prov portion points to a roughly $500m/$1b/$1.5b split. A good deal for us locally to have that cost spread out over a lot more taxpayers in Alberta and more importantly, Canada.
__________________
Trust the snake.
Bunk is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bunk For This Useful Post:
Old 09-11-2018, 03:37 PM   #103
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Exp:
Default

We need to see the actual report to see if they are bait and switching already committed dollars to the Nordic Center, Sliding center and Oval and saying those are a result of the Olympic Bid or if they are new dollars. Or if they are saying that the field house will be built first and only an Ice plant added like they were in the 4.6 billion bid.

No Games
--------------
300 million for a New Arena (Flames pay half)
200 million for a field house
200 million -- Brand New Stadium for the Stamps
---------------
700 million dollars

Why do we want to host the games?????
GGG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2018, 03:37 PM   #104
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Incogneto View Post
HOW DO PEOPLE NOT UNDERSTAND THAT THIS INCLUDES THE ARENA WHEN YOU LOOK CLOSELY?!?!?!?!

See post #74 : https://forum.calgarypuck.com/showpo...3&postcount=74
You don't even have to read between the lines, it was stated outright during the Council Q&A.

https://twitter.com/user/status/1039612202888699904


If they take the money allocated for the mid-sized arena, you make up the ~$90 million difference between the City and CSEC and you probably have money left over.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
Old 09-11-2018, 03:38 PM   #105
The Boy Wonder
First Line Centre
 
The Boy Wonder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aleks View Post
You're misreading. That's a medium venue, something for figure skating more than likely. 5000 seats is only 1000 more than the Winsport A. This has nothing to do with an NHL rink
Winsport A arena doesn't seat 4000... maybe if you take out the ice and have only a boxing ring in there.
The Boy Wonder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2018, 03:40 PM   #106
Senator Clay Davis
Franchise Player
 
Senator Clay Davis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Maryland State House, Annapolis
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG View Post
We need to see the actual report to see if they are bait and switching already committed dollars to the Nordic Center, Sliding center and Oval and saying those are a result of the Olympic Bid or if they are new dollars. Or if they are saying that the field house will be built first and only an Ice plant added like they were in the 4.6 billion bid.

No Games
--------------
300 million for a New Arena (Flames pay half)
200 million for a field house
200 million -- Brand New Stadium for the Stamps
---------------
700 million dollars

Why do we want to host the games?????
Nenshi seems determined to destroy his legacy for some reason.
__________________
"Think I'm gonna be the scapegoat for the whole damn machine? Sheeee......."
Senator Clay Davis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2018, 03:40 PM   #107
Icon
Franchise Player
 
Icon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

No arena...

I'm out.
Icon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2018, 03:41 PM   #108
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bunk View Post
Indeed. It'll be something like $550m-$600m. And that allocation will likely be on a lot of the stuff like the field house and housing that we'd likely want to do anyway here locally.

A "matching" by the feds of the mun/prov portion points to a roughly $500m/$1b/$1.5b split. A good deal for us locally to have that cost spread out over a lot more taxpayers in Alberta and more importantly, Canada.
I think you can make the argument the federal dollars are new money that we wouldn't have if not for the Olympics however the provincial dollars I think are money that if spent on Olympics will not be spent elsewhere. So Calgarians would be spending 1.5 billion on the Olympics.

It's also incredibly myopic to pretend that the federal dollars spent on us instead of them is a good thing for Canada. Regardless of where the dollars are spent they should be put to good use. And paying more for infrastructure than the infrastructure is worth is not a good use of tax dollars.
GGG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2018, 03:41 PM   #109
Aleks
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Aleks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Boy Wonder View Post
Winsport A arena doesn't seat 4000... maybe if you take out the ice and have only a boxing ring in there.
You're correct, its 3000 with ice, like 3700 without
__________________
In case of hurt feelings, please visit You are Not Alone forums
Aleks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2018, 03:42 PM   #110
The Boy Wonder
First Line Centre
 
The Boy Wonder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Nm

Last edited by The Boy Wonder; 09-11-2018 at 03:44 PM.
The Boy Wonder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2018, 03:44 PM   #111
CorsiHockeyLeague
Franchise Player
 
CorsiHockeyLeague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

There's a souvenir shop in downtown. It's on 8th ave right around Lammle's. I'm sure there are more but that one's pretty obvious. And having seen what they sell, I'm not totally clear on why you think there should be more of them.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
CorsiHockeyLeague is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2018, 03:47 PM   #112
GordonBlue
Franchise Player
 
GordonBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JBR View Post
Read the report again. It is not costing the city $3B
do you honestly think it will be on budget?
has an Olympics EVER been on budget, let alone a discount model?

when it is over, who covers the costs? sure as heck won't be the IOC.


for security, I can see it being 2B.
factor inflation from 2010 or now to 2026.
agreed that the area to be covered is lesser, and way different challenges.

but the world isn't safer, and you can't say it will be cheaper because there isn't Afganistan. the world is a very insecure place now and while there isn't a war, there sure as heck is a lot of loner terrorist attacks that Calgary would have to be aware of an try to prevent, on top of the usual.
GordonBlue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2018, 03:53 PM   #113
Incogneto
#1 Goaltender
 
Incogneto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Calgary - Transplanted Manitoban
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG View Post
We need to see the actual report to see if they are bait and switching already committed dollars to the Nordic Center, Sliding center and Oval and saying those are a result of the Olympic Bid or if they are new dollars. Or if they are saying that the field house will be built first and only an Ice plant added like they were in the 4.6 billion bid.

No Games
--------------
300 million for a New Arena (Flames pay half)
200 million for a field house
200 million -- Brand New Stadium for the Stamps
---------------
700 million dollars

Why do we want to host the games?????
So you're saying we are getting a two week party for free? Sign me up!
Incogneto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2018, 03:55 PM   #114
Yoho
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North America
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG View Post
I think you can make the argument the federal dollars are new money that we wouldn't have if not for the Olympics however the provincial dollars I think are money that if spent on Olympics will not be spent elsewhere. So Calgarians would be spending 1.5 billion on the Olympics.

It's also incredibly myopic to pretend that the federal dollars spent on us instead of them is a good thing for Canada. Regardless of where the dollars are spent they should be put to good use. And paying more for infrastructure than the infrastructure is worth is not a good use of tax dollars.
I have no problem with a little Federal funding to help our myopic disorders.
Yoho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2018, 03:56 PM   #115
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Incogneto View Post
So you're saying we are getting a two week party for free? Sign me up!
No, we pay 1.5 billion for 700 million in infrastructure plus waste 1.5 billion in federal dollars that could be better spent on other things. Plus we incur risk as this estimate is probably a -10/+30 estimate so put another 2 billion in risk money on the table.

So best case 1.5 billion for 700 million in infrastructure and a 2 week party. Worst case 5 billion for 500 million in infrastructure for a 2 week party.
GGG is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GGG For This Useful Post:
Old 09-11-2018, 03:59 PM   #116
JBR
Franchise Player
 
JBR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 161 St. - Yankee Stadium
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GordonBlue View Post
do you honestly think it will be on budget?
has an Olympics EVER been on budget, let alone a discount model?

when it is over, who covers the costs? sure as heck won't be the IOC.


for security, I can see it being 2B.
factor inflation from 2010 or now to 2026.
agreed that the area to be covered is lesser, and way different challenges.

but the world isn't safer, and you can't say it will be cheaper because there isn't Afganistan. the world is a very insecure place now and while there isn't a war, there sure as heck is a lot of loner terrorist attacks that Calgary would have to be aware of an try to prevent, on top of the usual.
To be clear, you are basing your YES/NO decision on your guess that the City's estimated $500-750M investment in the games will blow up to $3B?

On top of this, BIDCO estimates that 80-90% of the capital budget will be spent anyway just to keep existing facilities operating, Olympics or not. Let's say this is $600M already spent. A commitment of $150M buys you a couple of billion more from both levels of government and all other perks associated with the bid (yes, including a new arena).
JBR is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to JBR For This Useful Post:
Old 09-11-2018, 04:07 PM   #117
Bunk
Franchise Player
 
Bunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GordonBlue View Post
do you honestly think it will be on budget?
has an Olympics EVER been on budget, let alone a discount model?

when it is over, who covers the costs? sure as heck won't be the IOC.


for security, I can see it being 2B.
factor inflation from 2010 or now to 2026.
agreed that the area to be covered is lesser, and way different challenges.

but the world isn't safer, and you can't say it will be cheaper because there isn't Afganistan. the world is a very insecure place now and while there isn't a war, there sure as heck is a lot of loner terrorist attacks that Calgary would have to be aware of an try to prevent, on top of the usual.
It is a simpler task than Vancouver because you don't have ports to protect. Nonetheless, in the bid exploration they said costs can best be controlled by tightly clustering the venues. You can see that reflected in the venue plan. It's not that hard to secure something like Nakiska, Foothills Athletic Park and Stampede Park given you can isolate them from the surrounding fabric of the city, create controlled entry points quite easily.
__________________
Trust the snake.
Bunk is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bunk For This Useful Post:
Old 09-11-2018, 04:10 PM   #118
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG View Post
No, we pay 1.5 billion for 700 million in infrastructure plus waste 1.5 billion in federal dollars that could be better spent on other things. Plus we incur risk as this estimate is probably a -10/+30 estimate so put another 2 billion in risk money on the table.

So best case 1.5 billion for 700 million in infrastructure and a 2 week party. Worst case 5 billion for 500 million in infrastructure for a 2 week party.
With no real legacy from those federal dollars.

And once Calgary gets those federal dollars (and wastes them upgrading McMahon), you can rest assured there won't be any more federal dollars rolling this way any time soon.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2018, 04:10 PM   #119
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bunk View Post
I would bet the arena deal will get done, and it'll just become part of the games, should we host.
Would you bet $5B on it?
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 09-11-2018, 04:14 PM   #120
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by getbak View Post
You don't even have to read between the lines, it was stated outright during the Council Q&A.

https://twitter.com/user/status/1039612202888699904


If they take the money allocated for the mid-sized arena, you make up the ~$90 million difference between the City and CSEC and you probably have money left over.
So Nenshi is throwing out a half-baked $5B Olympic bid, and hoping that CSEC will join in, after criticizing CSEC that CalgaryNext was half baked.

With the amount of money the city would be spending on the Olympics (with this ridiculous proposal), we could get a new arena and a new stadium.

What a #### show.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:32 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy