09-11-2018, 03:35 PM
|
#101
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dieHARDflameZ
Do you actually believe this? Rumours out there are that it's been dead silence for a while now.
|
Yes I actually believe this. Deadly silent since the NDA.
|
|
|
09-11-2018, 03:36 PM
|
#102
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JBR
Read the report again. It is not costing the city $3B
|
Indeed. It'll be something like $550m-$600m. And that allocation will likely be on a lot of the stuff like the field house and housing that we'd likely want to do anyway here locally.
A "matching" by the feds of the mun/prov portion points to a roughly $500m/$1b/$1.5b split. A good deal for us locally to have that cost spread out over a lot more taxpayers in Alberta and more importantly, Canada.
__________________
Trust the snake.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Bunk For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-11-2018, 03:37 PM
|
#103
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
|
We need to see the actual report to see if they are bait and switching already committed dollars to the Nordic Center, Sliding center and Oval and saying those are a result of the Olympic Bid or if they are new dollars. Or if they are saying that the field house will be built first and only an Ice plant added like they were in the 4.6 billion bid.
No Games
--------------
300 million for a New Arena (Flames pay half)
200 million for a field house
200 million -- Brand New Stadium for the Stamps
---------------
700 million dollars
Why do we want to host the games?????
|
|
|
09-11-2018, 03:37 PM
|
#104
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Incogneto
|
You don't even have to read between the lines, it was stated outright during the Council Q&A.
https://twitter.com/user/status/1039612202888699904
If they take the money allocated for the mid-sized arena, you make up the ~$90 million difference between the City and CSEC and you probably have money left over.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-11-2018, 03:38 PM
|
#105
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aleks
You're misreading. That's a medium venue, something for figure skating more than likely. 5000 seats is only 1000 more than the Winsport A. This has nothing to do with an NHL rink
|
Winsport A arena doesn't seat 4000... maybe if you take out the ice and have only a boxing ring in there.
|
|
|
09-11-2018, 03:40 PM
|
#106
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Maryland State House, Annapolis
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG
We need to see the actual report to see if they are bait and switching already committed dollars to the Nordic Center, Sliding center and Oval and saying those are a result of the Olympic Bid or if they are new dollars. Or if they are saying that the field house will be built first and only an Ice plant added like they were in the 4.6 billion bid.
No Games
--------------
300 million for a New Arena (Flames pay half)
200 million for a field house
200 million -- Brand New Stadium for the Stamps
---------------
700 million dollars
Why do we want to host the games?????
|
Nenshi seems determined to destroy his legacy for some reason.
__________________
"Think I'm gonna be the scapegoat for the whole damn machine? Sheeee......."
|
|
|
09-11-2018, 03:40 PM
|
#107
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Calgary
|
No arena...
I'm out.
|
|
|
09-11-2018, 03:41 PM
|
#108
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bunk
Indeed. It'll be something like $550m-$600m. And that allocation will likely be on a lot of the stuff like the field house and housing that we'd likely want to do anyway here locally.
A "matching" by the feds of the mun/prov portion points to a roughly $500m/$1b/$1.5b split. A good deal for us locally to have that cost spread out over a lot more taxpayers in Alberta and more importantly, Canada.
|
I think you can make the argument the federal dollars are new money that we wouldn't have if not for the Olympics however the provincial dollars I think are money that if spent on Olympics will not be spent elsewhere. So Calgarians would be spending 1.5 billion on the Olympics.
It's also incredibly myopic to pretend that the federal dollars spent on us instead of them is a good thing for Canada. Regardless of where the dollars are spent they should be put to good use. And paying more for infrastructure than the infrastructure is worth is not a good use of tax dollars.
|
|
|
09-11-2018, 03:41 PM
|
#109
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Boy Wonder
Winsport A arena doesn't seat 4000... maybe if you take out the ice and have only a boxing ring in there.
|
You're correct, its 3000 with ice, like 3700 without
|
|
|
09-11-2018, 03:42 PM
|
#110
|
First Line Centre
|
Nm
Last edited by The Boy Wonder; 09-11-2018 at 03:44 PM.
|
|
|
09-11-2018, 03:44 PM
|
#111
|
Franchise Player
|
There's a souvenir shop in downtown. It's on 8th ave right around Lammle's. I'm sure there are more but that one's pretty obvious. And having seen what they sell, I'm not totally clear on why you think there should be more of them.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
|
|
|
09-11-2018, 03:47 PM
|
#112
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Alberta
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JBR
Read the report again. It is not costing the city $3B
|
do you honestly think it will be on budget?
has an Olympics EVER been on budget, let alone a discount model?
when it is over, who covers the costs? sure as heck won't be the IOC.
for security, I can see it being 2B.
factor inflation from 2010 or now to 2026.
agreed that the area to be covered is lesser, and way different challenges.
but the world isn't safer, and you can't say it will be cheaper because there isn't Afganistan. the world is a very insecure place now and while there isn't a war, there sure as heck is a lot of loner terrorist attacks that Calgary would have to be aware of an try to prevent, on top of the usual.
|
|
|
09-11-2018, 03:53 PM
|
#113
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Calgary - Transplanted Manitoban
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG
We need to see the actual report to see if they are bait and switching already committed dollars to the Nordic Center, Sliding center and Oval and saying those are a result of the Olympic Bid or if they are new dollars. Or if they are saying that the field house will be built first and only an Ice plant added like they were in the 4.6 billion bid.
No Games
--------------
300 million for a New Arena (Flames pay half)
200 million for a field house
200 million -- Brand New Stadium for the Stamps
---------------
700 million dollars
Why do we want to host the games?????
|
So you're saying we are getting a two week party for free? Sign me up!
|
|
|
09-11-2018, 03:55 PM
|
#114
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North America
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG
I think you can make the argument the federal dollars are new money that we wouldn't have if not for the Olympics however the provincial dollars I think are money that if spent on Olympics will not be spent elsewhere. So Calgarians would be spending 1.5 billion on the Olympics.
It's also incredibly myopic to pretend that the federal dollars spent on us instead of them is a good thing for Canada. Regardless of where the dollars are spent they should be put to good use. And paying more for infrastructure than the infrastructure is worth is not a good use of tax dollars.
|
I have no problem with a little Federal funding to help our myopic disorders.
|
|
|
09-11-2018, 03:56 PM
|
#115
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Incogneto
So you're saying we are getting a two week party for free? Sign me up!
|
No, we pay 1.5 billion for 700 million in infrastructure plus waste 1.5 billion in federal dollars that could be better spent on other things. Plus we incur risk as this estimate is probably a -10/+30 estimate so put another 2 billion in risk money on the table.
So best case 1.5 billion for 700 million in infrastructure and a 2 week party. Worst case 5 billion for 500 million in infrastructure for a 2 week party.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to GGG For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-11-2018, 03:59 PM
|
#116
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 161 St. - Yankee Stadium
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GordonBlue
do you honestly think it will be on budget?
has an Olympics EVER been on budget, let alone a discount model?
when it is over, who covers the costs? sure as heck won't be the IOC.
for security, I can see it being 2B.
factor inflation from 2010 or now to 2026.
agreed that the area to be covered is lesser, and way different challenges.
but the world isn't safer, and you can't say it will be cheaper because there isn't Afganistan. the world is a very insecure place now and while there isn't a war, there sure as heck is a lot of loner terrorist attacks that Calgary would have to be aware of an try to prevent, on top of the usual.
|
To be clear, you are basing your YES/NO decision on your guess that the City's estimated $500-750M investment in the games will blow up to $3B?
On top of this, BIDCO estimates that 80-90% of the capital budget will be spent anyway just to keep existing facilities operating, Olympics or not. Let's say this is $600M already spent. A commitment of $150M buys you a couple of billion more from both levels of government and all other perks associated with the bid (yes, including a new arena).
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to JBR For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-11-2018, 04:07 PM
|
#117
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GordonBlue
do you honestly think it will be on budget?
has an Olympics EVER been on budget, let alone a discount model?
when it is over, who covers the costs? sure as heck won't be the IOC.
for security, I can see it being 2B.
factor inflation from 2010 or now to 2026.
agreed that the area to be covered is lesser, and way different challenges.
but the world isn't safer, and you can't say it will be cheaper because there isn't Afganistan. the world is a very insecure place now and while there isn't a war, there sure as heck is a lot of loner terrorist attacks that Calgary would have to be aware of an try to prevent, on top of the usual.
|
It is a simpler task than Vancouver because you don't have ports to protect. Nonetheless, in the bid exploration they said costs can best be controlled by tightly clustering the venues. You can see that reflected in the venue plan. It's not that hard to secure something like Nakiska, Foothills Athletic Park and Stampede Park given you can isolate them from the surrounding fabric of the city, create controlled entry points quite easily.
__________________
Trust the snake.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Bunk For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-11-2018, 04:10 PM
|
#118
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG
No, we pay 1.5 billion for 700 million in infrastructure plus waste 1.5 billion in federal dollars that could be better spent on other things. Plus we incur risk as this estimate is probably a -10/+30 estimate so put another 2 billion in risk money on the table.
So best case 1.5 billion for 700 million in infrastructure and a 2 week party. Worst case 5 billion for 500 million in infrastructure for a 2 week party.
|
With no real legacy from those federal dollars.
And once Calgary gets those federal dollars (and wastes them upgrading McMahon), you can rest assured there won't be any more federal dollars rolling this way any time soon.
|
|
|
09-11-2018, 04:10 PM
|
#119
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bunk
I would bet the arena deal will get done, and it'll just become part of the games, should we host.
|
Would you bet $5B on it?
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-11-2018, 04:14 PM
|
#120
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by getbak
You don't even have to read between the lines, it was stated outright during the Council Q&A.
https://twitter.com/user/status/1039612202888699904
If they take the money allocated for the mid-sized arena, you make up the ~$90 million difference between the City and CSEC and you probably have money left over.
|
So Nenshi is throwing out a half-baked $5B Olympic bid, and hoping that CSEC will join in, after criticizing CSEC that CalgaryNext was half baked.
With the amount of money the city would be spending on the Olympics (with this ridiculous proposal), we could get a new arena and a new stadium.
What a #### show.
|
|
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:32 PM.
|
|