Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-04-2016, 02:32 PM   #101
edslunch
Franchise Player
 
edslunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Parallex View Post
We're about to be capped out as soon as we sign two of our young players to long-term big money 2nd contracts, we traded for goaltending then upgraded at back-up goaltending and signed a complementary winger to a fairly big dollar contract... we're in win-now mode.


Clearly they want to win this season, but they aren't at their peak/ideal roster yet until they clear some more contracts. Also win now implies making short term moves and forget about the future - e.g. Trading picks and prospects for vets. The Flames aren't there yet
edslunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2016, 02:33 PM   #102
Caged Great
Franchise Player
 
Caged Great's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I think the only guy on that list worth a try is Quincey and even then it would be just an okay addition and would require Wideman to be moved.
__________________
Fireside Chat - The #1 Flames Fan Podcast - FiresideChat.ca
Caged Great is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2016, 02:59 PM   #103
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Too bad they couldn't have gotten Hamhuis on the same contract he signed in Dallas and then moved out Wideman.
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Roof-Daddy For This Useful Post:
Old 07-04-2016, 03:25 PM   #104
Flash Walken
Lifetime Suspension
 
Flash Walken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
Exp:
Default

I will be stunned if Wideman is dealt.

If treliving manages to move Wideman it will be incredible. If he canove him without retaining salary it will be a damned miracle.

Back loaded contract, thanks feaster.
Flash Walken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2016, 03:29 PM   #105
Da_Chief
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
Does Ricardodw ever have a point that makes any sort of sense?

Any thread that has been Hamilton'd by Ricardodw
Post #71 is a valid point. Bringing back Russell can potentially cause that.

Then post #73 just dumps on him without even reading it.

Hamilton plays a high risk game which I don't mind but it's not for everyone. He will make unreal plays and also make some big mistakes. There were still some mistakes after he turned the corner last year.

Not ignoring those mistakes and focusing on them is what Ricardo is doing, ignoring those mistakes and remembering the good plays is what the rest of the posting group is doing.

The truth lies somewhere in the middle. For Ricardo, if he didn't bring up Hamilton is many threads then point would be taken better. The anti-ricardo posters jump on him any chance they get, if you're not going to read his posts or if he bugs you that much then why respond to it? just ignore it.

As much he "Ricardos" a thread posters like yourself give him a big hand in doing it.
Da_Chief is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Da_Chief For This Useful Post:
Old 07-04-2016, 03:30 PM   #106
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash Walken View Post
I will be stunned if Wideman is dealt.

If treliving manages to move Wideman it will be incredible. If he canove him without retaining salary it will be a damned miracle.

Back loaded contract, thanks feaster.

Back loaded contract AND a full NMC.

Awful
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Roof-Daddy For This Useful Post:
Old 07-04-2016, 03:37 PM   #107
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion View Post
Brad. Nakladal. Sign. Him.

Dump Wideman. Sign Nakladal. Sign, idk, Matt Carle? He was just bought out, though... sign someone, I don't care.

But sign Nakladal!
Well said.

Lanny_McDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Lanny_McDonald For This Useful Post:
Old 07-04-2016, 03:39 PM   #108
dino7c
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

You never know when you will get a shot to win...if you wait you may be waiting forever

Do you think SJ expected a shot at the cup this season? Calgary in 04?

I'm not saying got crazy and trade away all your future assets but an NHL team should try to ice the best possible lineup. With the salary cap the difference between the top teams to the bottom is smaller than ever.
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post:
Old 07-04-2016, 04:14 PM   #109
Badgers Nose
Franchise Player
 
Badgers Nose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Exp:
Default

Kind of strange that another D is taking up BT's cycles (any of his cycles, even if it's not a lot).

Flames are over flowing with D prospects, would it not be better to wait until camp to see what they have?

They still don't have a 1RW (sorry Troy) and their two superstars signed.
Badgers Nose is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Badgers Nose For This Useful Post:
Old 07-04-2016, 04:17 PM   #110
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Well in the interview Treliving talked about depth defencemen for Stockton. He also talked about moving some contracts.

So on the one hand you have a need to replace Johnson and Stevenson down on the farm.
On the other hand he may be exploring moves that are predicated on moving Wideman. I think moving Wideman out and acquiring a cheaper veteran would upgrade the roster.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2016, 04:20 PM   #111
btimbit
Franchise Player
 
btimbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: St. George's, Grenada
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
You never know when you will get a shot to win...if you wait you may be waiting forever

Do you think SJ expected a shot at the cup this season? Calgary in 04?

I'm not saying got crazy and trade away all your future assets but an NHL team should try to ice the best possible lineup. With the salary cap the difference between the top teams to the bottom is smaller than ever.
For sure. I don't like when people say stuff like the "Flames won't even compete for another two years at the earliest, so why waste money on x or y"

Screw that, compete now. Don't go all in and mortgage the future, don't trade away prospects or picks for rentals at the deadline, but do still ice the most competitive roster you can.
btimbit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2016, 04:25 PM   #112
Bend it like Bourgeois
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

They'll need a defenseman under contract into 2017-2018 who meets the games played requirement for the expansion draft. That could be as easy as signing Kevin, but they might want another option too.
Bend it like Bourgeois is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2016, 04:39 PM   #113
FlameZilla
First Line Centre
 
FlameZilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

How much would Seidenberg be after? He's always struck me as a rock-solid 2nd pairing guy.

...*before he blew out both knees in 2015. Could be Smid 2.0. Never mind.

Last edited by FlameZilla; 07-04-2016 at 04:52 PM.
FlameZilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2016, 04:52 PM   #114
mivdo
Crash and Bang Winger
 
mivdo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Exp:
Default

The two main problems with the flames last year was the goalie situation and defence. The goalie situation has been fixed and hopefully GGs system improves the defence considerably. We definitely have the staff for it. I believe Flames are a playoff team with those 2 things addressed.

If everything goes to plan I would like to see Wideman used sparingly, give him favourable matchups and time on the PP. Hopefully he racks up the points and is solid defensively against less offensively talented players. Profit.

Wishful thinking?
mivdo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mivdo For This Useful Post:
Old 07-04-2016, 04:58 PM   #115
FlameZilla
First Line Centre
 
FlameZilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mivdo View Post
The two main problems with the flames last year was the goalie situation and defence. The goalie situation has been fixed and hopefully GGs system improves the defence considerably. We definitely have the staff for it. I believe Flames are a playoff team with those 2 things addressed.

If everything goes to plan I would like to see Wideman used sparingly, give him favourable matchups and time on the PP. Hopefully he racks up the points and is solid defensively against less offensively talented players. Profit.

Wishful thinking?
If he's used as a bottom pairing Dman who bosses the PP with that killer shot I could see him having a resurgence. When he's relied upon heavily as a 2nd pairing guy he lets himself down in his own zone. If he's on pace to score 20 goals again I'm sure we could flip him to a contender for a solid return.
FlameZilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2016, 05:53 PM   #116
Badgers Nose
Franchise Player
 
Badgers Nose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mivdo View Post
The two main problems with the flames last year was the goalie situation and defence. The goalie situation has been fixed and hopefully GGs system improves the defence considerably. We definitely have the staff for it. I believe Flames are a playoff team with those 2 things addressed.

If everything goes to plan I would like to see Wideman used sparingly, give him favourable matchups and time on the PP. Hopefully he racks up the points and is solid defensively against less offensively talented players. Profit.

Wishful thinking?
If you are going to use him sparingly, at that cap hit, then I think you have to trade him. The fact he will be used sparingly at that cap hit from a Flames standpoint, and for him going into a contract year and wanting exposure to max his UFA status, should motivate both parties (not that I think BT need's motivation to move him).

Assuming he will waive (maybe the holdup is that he doesn't care about his next contract and won't waive), no one in the league seems to want him at his cap hit so you'll need to add. That's pretty meh from my perspective. A buy out would be preferable (seeing as its not my money).

So I think it will be better to try him out at 4D, if he fits give him lots of opportunity to ramp his value, and see if he is open to a move at the deadline (esp. if you tell him you won't be bidding on his services when he goes UFA). Even if you lose him for nothing, you got your money's worth.
Badgers Nose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2016, 05:58 PM   #117
Flash Walken
Lifetime Suspension
 
Flash Walken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
Exp:
Default

I think Wideman needs a long leash to be successful, as I don't believe he thinks the game well based on watching him attempt to direct traffic on the ice

I don't think you can be a successful team while Wideman is on the roster, his on ice playstyle is too disruptive to the rest of the lineup in a league that is increasingly reliant upon systems play.

Besides his stupid salary, I think that is the most likely reason we haven't really heard his name crop up.
Flash Walken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2016, 06:04 PM   #118
Stay Golden
Franchise Player
 
Stay Golden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: STH since 2002
Exp:
Default

Nakladal sign him. Problem solved.

Your 2 most key forwards Johnny and Monahan sign them already. Honestly that is all I care about the Flames GM accomplishing next. Guess the Flames do not like the reality of what the other teams signed their equivalent RFA's to mega deals that they earned.
__________________
Stay Golden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2016, 06:04 PM   #119
mivdo
Crash and Bang Winger
 
mivdo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Badgers Nose View Post
If you are going to use him sparingly, at that cap hit, then I think you have to trade him. The fact he will be used sparingly at that cap hit from a Flames standpoint, and for him going into a contract year and wanting exposure to max his UFA status, should motivate both parties (not that I think BT need's motivation to move him).

Assuming he will waive (maybe the holdup is that he doesn't care about his next contract and won't waive), no one in the league seems to want him at his cap hit so you'll need to add. That's pretty meh from my perspective. A buy out would be preferable (seeing as its not my money).

So I think it will be better to try him out at 4D, if he fits give him lots of opportunity to ramp his value, and see if he is open to a move at the deadline (esp. if you tell him you won't be bidding on his services when he goes UFA). Even if you lose him for nothing, you got your money's worth.
Ya he should definitely be traded. The problem right now, as others have mentioned, he is coming off a bad year. The best thing to do would be to maximize his value without hurting the Flames. Even if it means using him sparingly. He is an offensive dman who puts up points and that is where his value is. If you use him on the PP let him rack up the points, that is the best interest in both the team and Wideman.

Maybe he could be traded with salary retained? If he is putting up points, that may be a bit more enticing.
mivdo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2016, 07:34 PM   #120
the2bears
Franchise Player
 
the2bears's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Bay Area
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stay Golden View Post
Nakladal sign him. Problem solved.

Your 2 most key forwards Johnny and Monahan sign them already. Honestly that is all I care about the Flames GM accomplishing next. Guess the Flames do not like the reality of what the other teams signed their equivalent RFA's to mega deals that they earned.
What?
the2bears is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:01 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy