Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-22-2016, 07:34 PM   #101
MarchHare
Franchise Player
 
MarchHare's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: YSJ (1979-2002) -> YYC (2002-2022) -> YVR (2022-present)
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
People can lose their way, no question. But it is misguided to lay any of the blame on science.

It is also ironic, considering the extent of atrocities humans inflict on each other in the name of faith and religion.
Not to mention the concept of eugenics existed for 1500 years before the publication of On the Origin of Species, and Charles Darwin himself criticized eugenics as being an incorrect interpretation of his scientific theory of evolution.

Quote:
The idea of eugenics to produce better human beings has existed at least since Plato suggested selective mating to produce a guardian class. The idea of eugenics to decrease the birth of inferior human beings has existed at least since William Goodell (1829-1894) advocated the castration and spaying of the insane.

However, the term "eugenics" to describe the modern concept of improving the quality of human beings born into the world was originally developed by Francis Galton. Galton had read his half-cousin Charles Darwin's theory of evolution, which sought to explain the development of plant and animal species, and desired to apply it to humans. Galton believed that desirable traits were hereditary based on biographical studies; Darwin strongly disagreed with his interpretation of the book.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugenics
MarchHare is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to MarchHare For This Useful Post:
Old 06-22-2016, 09:17 PM   #102
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

It's funny how many ugly ideas laid at the feet of Darwin are not his ideas at all.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2016, 09:26 PM   #103
corporatejay
Franchise Player
 
corporatejay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by peter12 View Post
Most people who say they believe in creationism are really saying that they reject Darwinism's relevance as a homogenous theory that explains everything about who we are as human beings. They reject evolutionary biology's preference for ultimate rather than proximate causes for explaining the personal facets of life.

In this, I completely agree with them. I don't like the anti-intellectualism that accompanies it, however.
Without offering comment on the content of your post, I can almost, with 100% certainty conclude that no one in this poll thought that.
__________________
corporatejay is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to corporatejay For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:47 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy