Quote:
Originally Posted by Samonadreau
So the problem tonight was goaltending? On which of those goals did Ramo have a chance? Maybe the 3rd and thats a stretch. He held that game 1-1 till late in the third and it was an impossiible to stop one timer by Stammer. So now its Ramo's fault we only got one goal tonight?
For the most part (other then the first 10 minutes, Wideman and the late Gio penalty) the team played really well. Please dont make a desparate attempt to pin this loss (posted after tonights loss) on goaltending.
|
Ramo didn't put up a quality start last night. He only has 3 times this season.
Quote:
Originally Posted by http://www.hockeyabstract.com/testimonials/qualitystarts
An idea blatantly lifted from baseball, Quality Starts were one of Hockey Prospectus' first contributions back in 2009 as a measure of whether a goaltender "gave his team a chance to win". In order to record a Quality Start, the starting goalie must stop at least a league average number of shots (typically 91.3% prior to 2009-10, and 91.7% since), or play at least as well as a replacement-level goalie (88.5%) while allowing two goals or fewer.
|
In games where Ramo has put up a quality start, the Flames are 2-1, when he hasn't, 1-5. You can count on Ramo to provide league average goaltending once out of every 3 games. And that sucks.
Flames as an offensive unit could do from pulling more games out of the fire, but Karri has to stop getting lit up in the first place.