Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-18-2015, 06:50 PM   #101
Hockey
Franchise Player
 
Hockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pitt Meadows
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
Do you think Hartley should've gotten the $50k fine? BE HONEST.


PS: I used to live just off Austin in Coquitlam
I thought he deserved something for what he did. 50 G's I thought was a bit much though.

Also if you live just off of Austin in Coquitlam then there is a good chance I've delivered mail to you.
Hockey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2015, 06:54 PM   #102
Stay Golden
Franchise Player
 
Stay Golden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: STH since 2002
Exp:
Default

Dan O'Halloran should be pelted with garbage.
Hartley can rally the troops this is an us against the CSuscks, and the refs series.
Play your tails off boys prove your the better team.
__________________
Stay Golden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2015, 06:57 PM   #103
BACKCHECK!!!
First Line Centre
 
BACKCHECK!!!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: TEXAS!!
Exp:
Default

Hartley should pay the fine by having Bollig, Engelland, Smid, McGrattan, and Bouma all show up together at league HQ with the money.
__________________
I am a lunatic whose world revolves around hockey and Oilers hate.
BACKCHECK!!! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2015, 07:30 PM   #104
Derek Sutton
First Line Centre
 
Derek Sutton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sunnyvale
Exp:
Default

They should recall McGratton just for the reaction...





Then dress him.
__________________
The only thing better then a glass of beer is tea with Ms McGill
Derek Sutton is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Derek Sutton For This Useful Post:
Old 04-18-2015, 07:31 PM   #105
schteve_d
First Line Centre
 
schteve_d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Fort McMurray, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Sportsnet Stats @SNstats
#Flames Bob Hartley hasnow been fined 3 times for a total of $85,000 during his career as an NHL head coach.
I have never wanted to start one of those crowd-funding thingamajigs until now....
schteve_d is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2015, 07:58 PM   #106
CSharp
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Exp:
Default

Wow, 50G's for Hartley for something that he didn't mean to contribute. It's not like Hartley's a goon coach. And it's not like the Canucks coach had the pansy line out there either.
CSharp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2015, 08:02 PM   #107
CSharp
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Exp:
Default

I'd like to see Hartley start the game with this lineup on Sunday:

Gaudreau, McGrattan, Ferland
Engelland, Bollig

Flames defense to that: Gaudreau needs protection from the goofballs from the Canucks.
CSharp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2015, 08:46 PM   #108
EldrickOnIce
Franchise Player
 
EldrickOnIce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey View Post
I thought he deserved something for what he did. 50 G's I thought was a bit much though.

Also if you live just off of Austin in Coquitlam then there is a good chance I've delivered mail to you.
Deserved something for what he did?
For putting out the 4th line and 3rd defensive pairing?
At 50k per, that would cost the average NHL coach about a quarter million a game.
EldrickOnIce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2015, 08:55 PM   #109
3rd liner
#1 Goaltender
 
3rd liner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

I still get angry watching ferland and bollig each being restrained by an official while richardson goes ground and pound on stajan while the third official stands and watches while two canucks engage engelland. Whatever, it's done. Let's go to war tomorrow night.
3rd liner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2015, 09:01 PM   #110
RogerWilco
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by schteve_d View Post
I have never wanted to start one of those crowd-funding thingamajigs until now....
The Flames will probably cover the fine. These guys make enough money that the fine is pretty much moot. It is also already crowd funded. If anything it is a great rally cry.
RogerWilco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2015, 09:17 PM   #111
Flames89
First Line Centre
 
Flames89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Toronto, ON
Exp:
Default

Don't see the reason for much anger here. It all basically worked out. Engelland punched a guy that was down and Richardson hit a guy that was down. Game misconducts appropriately handed out (Hamhuis). No suspensions. Bad blood. Ready. Set. Go.
Flames89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2015, 09:21 PM   #112
Hockey
Franchise Player
 
Hockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pitt Meadows
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EldrickOnIce View Post
Deserved something for what he did?
For putting out the 4th line and 3rd defensive pairing?
At 50k per, that would cost the average NHL coach about a quarter million a game.
Hartley knew what was going to happen when he put those guys out when the game was out of reach. A fine was deserved.
Hockey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2015, 09:24 PM   #113
PrettyBoyFlizzy
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Exp:
Default

No fine for Richardson for trying to injure stajan? The refs and linesman not suspended or fined for losing all control?

This is what the team needed to galvanize them even more. We are going to run them out of canada.
PrettyBoyFlizzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2015, 09:25 PM   #114
flamesrule_kipper34
Franchise Player
 
flamesrule_kipper34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey View Post
Hartley knew what was going to happen when he put those guys out when the game was out of reach. A fine was deserved.
Yup and Willie knew what would happen with who he put out.

Hamhuis blatantly lied about a linesman/referee telling him to help aid a 1-1 fight.

Richardson gouged Stajan's eye.

But for sure, let's focus on Hartley "knowing what was going to happen" and justifying a 50k fine.
flamesrule_kipper34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2015, 09:44 PM   #115
Hockey
Franchise Player
 
Hockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pitt Meadows
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flamesrule_kipper34 View Post
Yup and Willie knew what would happen with who he put out.

Hamhuis blatantly lied about a linesman/referee telling him to help aid a 1-1 fight.

Richardson gouged Stajan's eye.

But for sure, let's focus on Hartley "knowing what was going to happen" and justifying a 50k fine.

Dorsett was the only guy on the ice who is considered a fighter for the Canucks. It all started when Bollig skated towards Lack well after the whistle and pushed Hamhuis. He and Hartley had an agenda at that was to try and get under the skin of the Canucks and try and get some momentum going into game 3.

If Canucks didn't push back on that then you guys would be calling them soft and can't hang with the big boys, but they fight back and now they are considered cheap and dirty. However the Flames are awesome for starting the whole thing.
Hockey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2015, 09:47 PM   #116
Street Pharmacist
Franchise Player
 
Street Pharmacist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey View Post
Dorsett was the only guy on the ice who is considered a fighter for the Canucks. It all started when Bollig skated towards Lack well after the whistle and pushed Hamhuis. He and Hartley had an agenda at that was to try and get under the skin of the Canucks and try and get some momentum going into game 3.

If Canucks didn't push back on that then you guys would be calling them soft and can't hang with the big boys, but they fight back and now they are considered cheap and dirty. However the Flames are awesome for starting the whole thing.
Hartley was definitely sending a message and the fine is justified, though excessive. It's the repeat offender that makes it so I suppose.

I don't have a problem in the end with the punishment or lack thereof, but I think the second man in thing for Hamhuis should've been liked at of Engelland was going to receive anything
Street Pharmacist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2015, 09:49 PM   #117
taxbuster
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

I seem to recall hearing that coach's fines cannot be covered by the team - this came up after the Torts/Hartley altercation last year. But there is nothing I believe to stop the players from coughing up some bucks. And Hartley makes ~$2M so he can afford it - not that Mrs. Hartley (is there one?) would be too happy about that!
taxbuster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2015, 09:55 PM   #118
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey View Post
Dorsett was the only guy on the ice who is considered a fighter for the Canucks. It all started when Bollig skated towards Lack well after the whistle and pushed Hamhuis. He and Hartley had an agenda at that was to try and get under the skin of the Canucks and try and get some momentum going into game 3.

If Canucks didn't push back on that then you guys would be calling them soft and can't hang with the big boys, but they fight back and now they are considered cheap and dirty. However the Flames are awesome for starting the whole thing.
As has been posted several times, the total fighting majors on the ice were 17 for the Flames and 23 for the Nucks. That Stajan is a real goon.

As to the bold: well yeah. Is there a team or coach in the history of the NHL that wouldn't want to set the tone late in a game? To my recollection though, there aren't fines every night.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2015, 10:12 PM   #119
868904
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames89 View Post
Don't see the reason for much anger here. It all basically worked out. Engelland punched a guy that was down and Richardson hit a guy that was down. Game misconducts appropriately handed out (Hamhuis). No suspensions. Bad blood. Ready. Set. Go.
Can someone please put the video that shows Engelland punching Dorset while he was down? I have looked everywhere and found no evidence of this. I've only read that this is what Hamhuis said, but there is no video evidence of this anywhere. There's plenty of video evidence of Richardson doing this to Stajan.

In the video i've seen, it's Engelland and Dorset wrestling, Dorset went down on one knee, and then got back up and then Hamhuis comes flying in and Engelland starts throwing punches at both.
__________________
Calgary Flames, PLEASE GO TO THE NET! AND SHOOT THE PUCK! GENERATING OFFENSE IS NOT DIFFICULT! SKATE HARD, SHOOT HARD, CRASH THE NET HARD!
868904 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to 868904 For This Useful Post:
Old 04-18-2015, 10:13 PM   #120
TjRhythmic
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

Calgary needs to hurry up and finish off the Canucks... playing them is getting expensive for Hartley
TjRhythmic is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:36 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy