You don't beat someone with a weapon when they don't pose an immediate harm to anyone, your reasoning is bad. Dude made a dumb mistake, doesn't deserve to be physically harmed as the harm caused to the officer would not justify permanent physical harm. Morally you beat someone with a weapon to neutralize a legitimate threat.
Exactly. The officer did the right thing by turning the other cheek.
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to gargamel For This Useful Post:
In a case like this I would approve if that police officer had pulled out his nightstick and laid a beating on Claude Giroux or any other drunk who would act like this in public.
Strombad? is this the new you?
The Following User Says Thank You to combustiblefuel For This Useful Post: