Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-28-2013, 10:13 AM   #101
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I'd like to see a third line of Galiardi- Monahan- Hudler. That's all i got for predictions.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2013, 10:16 AM   #102
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bandwagon In Flames View Post
It's pretty set in stone that D. Jones will be a top 9 RW to start the season. Hopefully he can regain his scoring form from a few years ago and continue to use his body.

McGrattan will most definitely stay on the fourth line with our scoring depth. The third line will be a scoring line so just throw Jones in there and waive Jackman. Guy is an enforcer that can't win fights. Not to mention we have enough tough guys without him.

Cammalleri-Backlund-Hudler
Glencross-Stajan-Stempniak
Baertschi-Monahan-D.Jones
Bouma-Galiardi-McGrattan

If a LW or Center is not playing well than get Galiardi into a scoring line, guy does not belong on the fourth line.

Jackman is a grinder not a fighter. You keep Jackman because someone has to eat popcorn. You can't put a youngster like Ferland in the pressbox for 50+ games.

Your lines look about right. Would like to see Horak get playing time, but it will be tough.

As for goalies i would have thought they would have sent Berra down by now? Maybe he is getting back-up job, and they are trying to squeeze MacDonlad through waivers when the most amount of players get waived.
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2013, 10:17 AM   #103
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
I'd like to see a third line of Galiardi- Monahan- Hudler. That's all i got for predictions.
I like that line, but i have to think they will give D. Jones first crack at top 9.
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2013, 10:29 AM   #104
moon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattman View Post
Call me crazy but I think a line of Cammy- Monohan- MgGratten could be something that would work.
Cammy ain't on the 1st line so he is able to move around and go C or LW or even RW. He is still one of our best players on the team and I think if he can't be with Glencross, Stempniak or Stajan then he should be with Monohan and help him adjust to the NHL and get him going.
MgGratten is overlooked by lots of people. He is gritty but is always stepping up for people. He played great at the end of last season on a line with the "younger guys". IMO he is one of the rare players on the flames that plays with passion. Call me crazy!

I think they would both be great mentors for Monohan.
McGrattan is barely AHL level in terms of hockey talent. Having him on that line is either a waste of a spot (if they are playing more than 5 minutes) or a waste of Monahan (having him here for 5 minutes).

Guys like Jones, Glencross and even Stempniak should be able to do a fine job of stepping up for Monahan on a line if need be. SOB and Gio can step up from defense if need be and Monahan isn't some 5'8 160 lbs. weakling and can stand up for himself.

McGrattan should see maybe 20-30 games this year at most and spend the majority of his time in the PB. While I like the excitement his fights bring for the most part other teams aren't going to have guys for him to fight and we have way too many young guys that need playing time to waste giving McGrattan a regular shift.
moon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2013, 11:40 PM   #105
CalgaryFan1988
Franchise Player
 
CalgaryFan1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

Cammalleri - Stajan - Hudler
Glencross - Backlund - Stempniak
Baertshi - Colborne - D. Jones
Galiardi - Bouma - Jackman
McGrattan

Giordano - Wideman
Brodie - O'Brien
Butler - Russell
Breen

Ramo
MacDonald

I think this is most likely the lineup after Monahan gets his 1-9 games.
CalgaryFan1988 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2013, 11:54 PM   #106
Skaloper
First Line Centre
 
Skaloper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: BC
Exp:
Default

Cammalleri - Backlund - Hudler
Glencross - Stajan - Stempniak
Galiardi - Colborne - D. Jones
Baertschi- Monahan - Horak
McGrattan Bouma

Giordano - Wideman
Brodie - O'Brien
Butler - Russell
Breen

Ramo
MacDonald

This is my guess after the addition of Colborne.
Skaloper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2013, 12:05 AM   #107
djsFlames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

McGrattan should be out there for 50+ games with human flesh on his knuckles of anybody who so much as looks at our youngsters sideways.
djsFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2013, 12:52 AM   #108
Savvy27
#1 Goaltender
 
Savvy27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Exp:
Default

Glencross - Stajan - Stempniak
Cammalleri - Colborne - Hudler
Baertschi - Backlund - Jones
Bouma - Horak - Galiardi
McGrattan

Giordano - Brodie
Russell - Wideman
Smith - O'Brien
Butler

Ramo
Berra

Monahan back to junior. Sure, he could stay and be a fourth line guy, but it would probably be better for him to go back and dominate the OHL and be a go-to guy at the world juniors.

Going off of what McKenzie and Friedman said about Colborne, he isn't a checker so playing him with Cammalleri and Hudler would put him in a prime position to put up some points. Hartley can give them soft minutes and offensive zone starts as he eases into the NHL and we'll see what we've got.

I like the idea of a Baertschi-Backlund-Jones line. Hopefully Jones will be able to create some space out there for the other two and also cause mayhem in front of the net.

Waive Jackman.

I really wish we had a better #4 than Russell.
Savvy27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2013, 04:29 AM   #109
FlameZilla
First Line Centre
 
FlameZilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

I reckon Cammy's out for the 1st few games. Monahan is blatantly only going to get less than 9 games (maybe 4 games now & 5 at the end of the OHL season). Sven is 50/50 to go down in my opinion.
FlameZilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2013, 08:41 AM   #110
moon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by djsFlames View Post
McGrattan should be out there for 50+ games with human flesh on his knuckles of anybody who so much as looks at our youngsters sideways.
Well if that happens then he is likely suspended enough that he doesn't come close to playing 50 games.
moon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2013, 10:42 AM   #111
flambers
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

With Smith getting waived, I'll be curious to see if the Flames will pick up another dman...

As I would guess Seiloff will be assigned to AHL
flambers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2013, 10:53 AM   #112
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flambers View Post
With Smith getting waived, I'll be curious to see if the Flames will pick up another dman...

As I would guess Seiloff will be assigned to AHL
More than likely Smith does not get claimed and could be called up after Seiloff has a 9 game stint.
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2013, 10:55 AM   #113
AC
Resident Videologist
 
AC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275 View Post
More than likely Smith does not get claimed and could be called up after Seiloff has a 9 game stint.
But Sieloff is playing pro regardless this year, so there is no 9 game stint... right?
AC is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to AC For This Useful Post:
Old 09-29-2013, 10:57 AM   #114
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AC View Post
But Sieloff is playing pro regardless this year, so there is no 9 game stint... right?
The 9 game stint refers to NHL games only and not pro games.

So if Sieloff does not play more than 9 NHL games and plays the rest in the AHL his ELC will slide another year.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 09-29-2013, 11:03 AM   #115
AC
Resident Videologist
 
AC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
The 9 game stint refers to NHL games only and not pro games.

So if Sieloff does not play more than 9 NHL games and plays the rest in the AHL his ELC will slide another year.
Awesome, good to know!
AC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2013, 11:07 AM   #116
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moon View Post
Well if that happens then he is likely suspended enough that he doesn't come close to playing 50 games.

Why would McGratton be suspended for fighting?
transplant99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2013, 11:11 AM   #117
Fire
Franchise Player
 
Fire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
The 9 game stint refers to NHL games only and not pro games.

So if Sieloff does not play more than 9 NHL games and plays the rest in the AHL his ELC will slide another year.
Really? Are you 100% sure of this? This would be a nice surprise. I always thought playing in the AHL would burn a year off his deal.
__________________

Fire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2013, 11:15 AM   #118
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire View Post
Really? Are you 100% sure of this? This would be a nice surprise. I always thought playing in the AHL would burn a year off his deal.
Yes it is covered by CBA section 9.1 and Jerry D'Amigo played 43 games as a 19 year old for the Marlies and had his contract slide 1 year
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 09-29-2013, 11:44 AM   #119
Cleveland Steam Whistle
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Exp:
Default

If the Flames have to put Colborne (or a vet) in the press box for a few games to give Monahan is 9 games of experience, they should do that. Whatever is best for asset development and acquisition they should do that.
Cleveland Steam Whistle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2013, 11:47 AM   #120
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Cammalleri-Backlund-Hudler
Glencross-Stajan-Stempniak
Baertschi-Monahan-Jones
Galliardi-Colborne-Bouma
McGratten/Jackman

Giordano-Brodie
Russell-Wideman
Butler-O'Brien

Ramo
MacDonald
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:01 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy