Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-03-2013, 05:11 PM   #101
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bubbsy View Post
Bryan Murray is a damn good GM.
And Steve Yzerman, it seems, is not.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2013, 05:53 PM   #102
Machiavelli
Franchise Player
 
Machiavelli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Exp:
Default

Murray absolutely took advantage of Bishop playing a short stretch decent hockey.

No way should Ben Bishop net a top prospect. Just madness from Yzerman; what is he thinking?
__________________
KNOWLEDGE IS POWER. I love power.
Machiavelli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2013, 05:54 PM   #103
Senator Clay Davis
Franchise Player
 
Senator Clay Davis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Maryland State House, Annapolis
Exp:
Default

Murray wins executive of the year with this alone. Your new top scorer for your third goalie? Impressive to say the least. Love that he had the balls to ask for Couturier too.
__________________
"Think I'm gonna be the scapegoat for the whole damn machine? Sheeee......."
Senator Clay Davis is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Senator Clay Davis For This Useful Post:
Old 04-03-2013, 06:22 PM   #104
trackercowe
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
so glad Feaster didn't pursue Bishop - probably would have cost us Gaudeau

let's give RamoBerra a chance and see what we've got - what's the risk, that we suck next year?
If Murray was asking for Courterier or Conacher we were probably going to have to give up a lot more than just Gaudreau for Bishop; probably Gaudreau and a first at least.
trackercowe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2013, 06:27 PM   #105
opendoor
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

While I think Conacher's a little overrated due to a hot streak and playing with Stamkos, this is still just a terrible deal. Yzerman has now thrown away Conacher, two 2nds, a 3rd, and a 4th on half assed goaltending solutions rather than actually trying to acquire legitimate talent.

It's like he thinks he can just shoehorn the Detroit model onto Tampa without the top 5 of all time defenseman that really made the cheap goaltending work.
opendoor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2013, 07:10 PM   #106
homestand
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Exp:
Default

Bish seems to be having a pretty good game tonight.
5-0 halfway through the 3rd.
homestand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2013, 07:15 PM   #107
devo22
Franchise Player
 
devo22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by homestand View Post
Bish seems to be having a pretty good game tonight.
5-0 halfway through the 3rd.
yup. 39 saves after 50 minutes ... not bad.
devo22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2013, 07:15 PM   #108
moon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Hasn't Conacher slowed way down after a hot 10 games to start the season/

Still a lot to pay but I think his story might pump up how good an actual prospect he is.
moon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2013, 07:23 PM   #109
868904
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moon View Post
Hasn't Conacher slowed way down after a hot 10 games to start the season/

Still a lot to pay but I think his story might pump up how good an actual prospect he is.
I agree, Conacher is a good player but he's not a guy you build around. You don't build a team around a 5'8 175 lb forward. He's a good support player if you have other core star players. Like a Tanguay or Cammaleri.

Bishop is a guy you can build around if he fully develops.

If both guys fully develop, Bishop is the bigger impact player. Conacher at this stage may be slightly ahead if Bishop in his development, but I do t think it's by much.
__________________
Calgary Flames, PLEASE GO TO THE NET! AND SHOOT THE PUCK! GENERATING OFFENSE IS NOT DIFFICULT! SKATE HARD, SHOOT HARD, CRASH THE NET HARD!
868904 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2013, 07:33 PM   #110
FAN
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 868904 View Post
You don't build a team around a 5'8 175 lb forward.
Ya. The Flames are going nowhere if Martin St. Louis is counted upon to play a top 6 role. Wait... what year is this?
FAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2013, 07:37 PM   #111
AR_Six
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Exp:
Default

45 save shutout in your first game... way to make a statement.
AR_Six is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2013, 07:55 PM   #112
Da_Chief
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2007
Exp:
Default

Good, hopefully it pushes Bolts out of top 5 for good.
Da_Chief is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2013, 08:04 PM   #113
Ped
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Ontario
Exp:
Default

IMO this is exactly the type of trade that you can't judge immediately.

Bishop has always looked pretty decent but this is his first chance to take over a starting role.

Conacher had a great start but I think the TSN guys said it best that they had a lot of the same type of player and their new head coach knows them better then anyone.

This one will have to wait to see if Bishop can become an NHL starter or Conacher a top 6 mainstay.
Ped is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2013, 08:05 PM   #114
VladtheImpaler
Franchise Player
 
VladtheImpaler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 868904 View Post
I agree, Conacher is a good player but he's not a guy you build around. You don't build a team around a 5'8 175 lb forward. He's a good support player if you have other core star players. Like a Tanguay or Cammaleri.

Bishop is a guy you can build around if he fully develops.

If both guys fully develop, Bishop is the bigger impact player. Conacher at this stage may be slightly ahead if Bishop in his development, but I do t think it's by much.
I don't know if this has already been mentioned, but I happened to be listening to the FAN in the car when this trade broke, and Loumbardias was saying that TB has a whole bunch of guys in their system in the Conacher mold, and that Cooper knows all these guys well, so they probably felt they could afford to let Conacher go. While Ottawa was dealing from a position of strength, so was TB. FWIW.
__________________
Cordially as always,
Vlad the Impaler

Please check out http://forum.calgarypuck.com/showthr...94#post3726494

VladtheImpaler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2013, 08:15 PM   #115
868904
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FAN View Post
Ya. The Flames are going nowhere if Martin St. Louis is counted upon to play a top 6 role. Wait... what year is this?
How many Martin St. Louis are there relative to big impact no. 1 goalies?

I'm not saying it never happens that a small player like that becomes your key player, I'm just saying the big goalie is more likely.
__________________
Calgary Flames, PLEASE GO TO THE NET! AND SHOOT THE PUCK! GENERATING OFFENSE IS NOT DIFFICULT! SKATE HARD, SHOOT HARD, CRASH THE NET HARD!
868904 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:54 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy