Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-03-2012, 11:19 PM   #101
cowtown75
Powerplay Quarterback
 
cowtown75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Airdrie
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by $ven27 View Post
Well, because pretty much every team has some degree of a winning past/culture. Yes the Flames have had some degree of success for a few years with prime Iggy, Kipper, etc, and yes the 80's Flames were awesome, But you're kidding yourself if you can say the 90s/early 2000s were successful, they were horrible. I'm not sure why you're attacking everyone, if you don't like how people respond to your posts, don't post.
Forget it man, if I seriously have to explain what I mean to you about the Flames organization as a whole having a lot of team and individual honors~ then it's not worth my time to explain it to you.
cowtown75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2012, 11:27 PM   #102
$ven27
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Halifax
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cowtown75 View Post
Did I say the early 90's and early 2000's were successful at all ? As for attacking everyone, I don't, but I'm getting sick and tired of a couple of people nit picking for the sake of nit picking and feeling like I'm talking to a Canucks fan vs a Flames fan. Feels like I'm talking with more woman then men at times.
We both admit that the 80's and late 2000's were considered successful for the most part. take away the 90s and early 2000's and there's no Flames seasons, so I don't get where this " Successful Organization " stuff from. Yeah they were at one time considered a Successful organization, but not today no. The flames aren't the only team who have honored players, it's not hard to understand. Just because people don't agree with your rose-colored glasses idea's doesn't merit completely losing it.
$ven27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2012, 11:39 PM   #103
Mean Mr. Mustard
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cowtown75 View Post
Forget it man, if I seriously have to explain what I mean to you about the Flames organization as a whole having a lot of team and individual honors~ then it's not worth my time to explain it to you.
3 playoff series wins since 1990. 2004 was obviously magical and it rejuvenated the team and the fanbase but that was 8 years ago and the Flames have yet to win a series since. It isn't an insult to say that the team has been a disappointment and hasn't had a winning tradition more than the Islanders or the Oilers.
Mean Mr. Mustard is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Mean Mr. Mustard For This Useful Post:
Old 12-03-2012, 11:41 PM   #104
cowtown75
Powerplay Quarterback
 
cowtown75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Airdrie
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mean Mr. Mustard View Post
3 playoff series wins since 1990. 2004 was obviously magical and it rejuvenated the team and the fanbase but that was 8 years ago and the Flames have yet to win a series since. It isn't an insult to say that the team has been a disappointment and hasn't had a winning tradition more than the Islanders or the Oilers.
Agreed.
cowtown75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2012, 11:48 PM   #105
Mean Mr. Mustard
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Exp:
Default

Regardless to base ones future potential on past results from teams that now have different management, scouts, and coaches seems foolish. I don't think Montreal is going to be a powerhouse because Sam Pollock was a great GM in the 1970s, likewise Calgary's future has nothing to do with the tradition of winning in the 80s before many of the Flames prospects were a thought.

The other thing is especially with prospects is it really is a crapshoot and it is really easy to overestimate one's own teams prospects.
Mean Mr. Mustard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2012, 12:04 AM   #106
cowtown75
Powerplay Quarterback
 
cowtown75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Airdrie
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mean Mr. Mustard View Post
Regardless to base ones future potential on past results from teams that now have different management, scouts, and coaches seems foolish. I don't think Montreal is going to be a powerhouse because Sam Pollock was a great GM in the 1970s, likewise Calgary's future has nothing to do with the tradition of winning in the 80s before many of the Flames prospects were a thought.

The other thing is especially with prospects is it really is a crapshoot and it is really easy to overestimate one's own teams prospects.
Oh for sure- And trust me, I'm not basing our future on the past. I just really like the little moves the organization has done in terms of scouting, coaching, GM. I like our last 2 years of drafting and I believe that there are guys like Sven, Sieloff who could turn into solid players and who knows, maybe some surprises along the way. We seem to be drafting better with a different philosophy and I like that too. The next 5 years of drafting should be interesting. All in all, I love the direction we are going and I love the fact that the team doesn't want to do a complete rip it down re-build and wants to compete every year. I love thew additions of Hudler, Cervenka, Wideman, Rammo. I like that there is more attention being paid to stocking our prospects- like adding Street, Aliu, etc. I like the focus that Jay has put on these things because they were pretty much ignored it seems during the Sutter years.
cowtown75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2012, 12:34 AM   #107
cowtown75
Powerplay Quarterback
 
cowtown75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Airdrie
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by $ven27 View Post
We both admit that the 80's and late 2000's were considered successful for the most part. take away the 90s and early 2000's and there's no Flames seasons, so I don't get where this " Successful Organization " stuff from. Yeah they were at one time considered a Successful organization, but not today no. The flames aren't the only team who have honored players, it's not hard to understand. Just because people don't agree with your rose-colored glasses idea's doesn't merit completely losing it.
Lol- sorry man. I agree I do tend to wear rose- colored glasses when it comes to the Flames, and being 37 and have followed them forever, I tend to try and only remember the good 'ol days- I know that's not right or in the now and I do tend to get a bit " Don Cherryish" at times. My apologies for being on the offensive and hope you have a good night.
cowtown75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2012, 10:03 AM   #108
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

BTW, there is a Bolivian soccer team, actually called The Strongest.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Strongest
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2012, 11:04 AM   #109
cannon7
Needs More Cowbell
 
cannon7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Not Canada, Eh?
Exp:
Default

I'm sad to say that I think, with enough #1 overall picks, the Edmonton Oilers will eventually get it right. That Shultz kid is lighting up the AHL, so they're even having good fortune with FAs.


The Avalanche have a strong young group, as do the Blues.
cannon7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2017, 01:14 PM   #110
hansmoleman
Backup Goalie
 
hansmoleman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by diane_phaneuf View Post
just to give an example of how hard this would be

in 2007 the Anaheim Mighty Ducks won the stanley cup led by 3 players under 22 all coming off huge years and bigger playoffs (Perry/Getzlaf/Penner)

They now would be in the discussion for bottom 5 teams in the league

The St.Louis Blues, Chicago Blackhawks, Montreal Canadians, Edmonton Oilers, Phoenix Coyotes, Edmonton Oilers all were ranked as having top 10 prospect groups

only 1 of them (Chicago) was ever in the discussion as being the best team the last 5 years


meaning that it's extremely hard to predict, outside of Detroit always being in the mix
I havent been on CP in like 5 years but found this old thread I posted last time I was active. Funny reading through who everyone thought would be successful around now.

Detroit always in the mix?

Seguin leading the way for Boston?

Jankowski breaking through in 2017?

Goes to show that those who said 5 years is too hard to predict were pretty right.
__________________
hansmoleman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2017, 01:20 PM   #111
ClubFlames
Posted the 2 millionth post!
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tron_fdc View Post
If we miss a year and the draft goes down the same way it did the last time we had a lockout, could you imagine if Edmonton got another 1st overall?

I'd jump in front of a bus.
I hope you didn't hurt yourself too much.
__________________

ClubFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to ClubFlames For This Useful Post:
Old 02-22-2017, 01:27 PM   #112
madmike
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hansmoleman View Post
I havent been on CP in like 5 years but found this old thread I posted last time I was active. Funny reading through who everyone thought would be successful around now.

Detroit always in the mix?

Seguin leading the way for Boston?

Jankowski breaking through in 2017?

Goes to show that those who said 5 years is too hard to predict were pretty right.
Janko broke through in the AHL in 2017....
madmike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2017, 01:35 PM   #113
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

One thing is still true. The Flames are around 5 years away
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2017, 01:56 PM   #114
Cali Panthers Fan
Franchise Player
 
Cali Panthers Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Exp:
Default

So many lifetime suspensions and guys/girls that just don't post anymore. Kinda makes me sad.
__________________
"You know, that's kinda why I came here, to show that I don't suck that much" ~ Devin Cooley, Professional Goaltender
Cali Panthers Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Cali Panthers Fan For This Useful Post:
Old 02-22-2017, 02:13 PM   #115
East Coast Flame
Powerplay Quarterback
 
East Coast Flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Huntingwhale View Post
I don't think the Sharks will be close at all. Boyle, Thornton, and Marleau are all on the wrong side of 30. Havlat is always hurt, Burns took a step back since being traded, and Niemi isn't the solid franchise goalie they need. Todd McLellan plays an uptempo style that attacks hard, but they need an injection of youth in their top 6 to stay competitive. They have a good GM, but I think the Sharks are on the downswing once play resumes.
East Coast Flame is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to East Coast Flame For This Useful Post:
Old 02-22-2017, 02:16 PM   #116
Young_Guns
Scoring Winger
 
Young_Guns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Exp:
Default

5 years from now, the strongest team in the NHL will be the Quebec Nordiques
Young_Guns is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Young_Guns For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:36 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy