Woman Drivers

[Bertuzzied]

Originally posted by Phanuthier+May 20 2005, 08:34 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Phanuthier @ May 20 2005, 08:34 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>

That's potentially one of the most moronic things I've ever heard of. Once contact begins between two forces, you are out of control as to what happens next. It's bad enough that accidents happen, to hear there are people out there that cause them intentionally is a real p*ss off. You jackasses are contributing to higher insurance rates, more injuries and a whole hell of lot more stress in peoples lives. Wise up.

Umm... I'm not sure if you were implying otherwise, but I was saying it *was* a stupid idea to slam on your breaks. [/b][/quote]
Umm i think he quoted the wrong person. hehe.
They should give $200 tickets to people who don't signal.

[Eddie Bronze]

Sorry Phanuthier, to clarify, I am in agreeance with what you are saying in the quote. It's the idea being expressed by others that I am against. My apologies.

[Looger]

Originally posted by photon@May 20 2005, 07:56 PM
Poor Looger, the persecuted driver defending all that is right and good, one intentional accident at a time.

We should build a wall around you.

wow.

i've been schooled.

i am absolutely amazed at what passes for discussion here.

if you've got insults, private message me.

don't spread your crap all over this forum.

have a dispute with an opinion i have?

respond to it like an adult.

leave it in the third grade, for god's sake.

[photon]

I fail to see how any of that is an insult... You were the one to draw the parallel to a persecuted freedom fighter being classified as a terrorist, not I.

Since you said my logic was the same as the oppresive regime the only logical solution was to build a wall around the opressed.

(If you don't find the funny in that, sorry, sometimes I have an odd sense of humour)

At any rate, it seemed appropriate to respond to hyperbole with hyperbole. But I guess that didn't work.

I'll rephrase it: I disagree with your actions and opinions. And I don't see how thinking that right and wrong aren't related to the number of people committing the act relates to a group of people being opressed by another group of people.