Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-01-2011, 11:54 AM   #101
woob
#1 Goaltender
 
woob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sliver View Post
Seriously I'm not going to keep arguing this with you if you keep editing your posts so it makes my subsequent posts look idiotic.
Sorry for using clear examples to refute your earlier statements.
woob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2011, 12:03 PM   #102
mykalberta
Franchise Player
 
mykalberta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Ok not a geek queston...

If you have winter tires on separate rims, can you simply take your summers off and put your winters on without issue if you have a torque wrench etc?
__________________
MYK - Supports Arizona to democtratically pass laws for the state of Arizona
Rudy was the only hope in 08
2011 Election: Cons 40% - Nanos 38% Ekos 34%
mykalberta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2011, 12:11 PM   #103
Sliver
evil of fart
 
Sliver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob View Post
Sorry for using clear examples to refute your earlier statements.
Supercars of 20 and 30 years ago perform like sports cars do today. Let's see some sports car examples from the 70s and 80s that perform like sports cars in 2011.
Sliver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2011, 12:15 PM   #104
woob
#1 Goaltender
 
woob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sliver View Post
Supercars of 20 and 30 years ago perform like sports cars do today. Let's see some sports car examples from the 70s and 80s that perform like sports cars in 2011.
Now now, Sliver. You can't change your earlier statement.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sliver
By today's standards, no, 70s/80s Ferraris aren't sports cars.
woob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2011, 12:24 PM   #105
Sliver
evil of fart
 
Sliver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob View Post
Now now, Sliver. You can't change your earlier statement.
Ugh, I'm doing exactly what I said I wouldn't do, which is argue with you about this.

Here's an example for you: a 1977 Ferrari 308 GTB with a 0-60 mph of 8.1 seconds.

Today that kind of 0-60 wouldn't be considered a sports car. Back then it was a sports car. That's the type of Ferrari I was referencing when I made the above comment.

Ferrari supercars (what you've been referencing) from back then are more akin to sports cars today.

My point is this: cars today perform better in every measurable way than their equivalents from the 70s and 80s. Do you agree with that?
Sliver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2011, 12:30 PM   #106
Bill Bumface
My face is a bum!
 
Bill Bumface's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Exp:
Default

Don't worry Silver, the rest of us understand the concept of a Toyota Sienna beating several different models of Ferrari from that era, and yet how a Sienna isn't a sports car now but a Ferrari was a sports car then and standards change.

On that note, I sure enjoyed smoking civics (which would also beat a Ferrari 308 GTB) with our rental Sienna in Florida. That thing was awesome.
Bill Bumface is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2011, 12:32 PM   #107
Table 5
Franchise Player
 
Table 5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NYYC
Exp:
Default

Appropriate video for this topic...



Those Deloreans sure did suck even back in their day. Still would love one though.

And damn, those 308's are so damn sexy no matter how old they are.

Last edited by Table 5; 11-01-2011 at 12:34 PM.
Table 5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2011, 12:33 PM   #108
Sliver
evil of fart
 
Sliver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Exp:
Default

You guys have to quit bringing up my hotrod Sienna or Redvan's going to get jealous.

But yeah, since you brought it up, my Sienna would wipe the floor with some Ferraris from a few decades back. Minivans, is there anything they can't do?
Sliver is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Sliver For This Useful Post:
Old 11-01-2011, 12:43 PM   #109
woob
#1 Goaltender
 
woob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sliver
Here's an example for you: a 1977 Ferrari 308 GTB with a 0-60 mph of 8.1 seconds.

Today that kind of 0-60 wouldn't be considered a sports car. Back then it was a sports car. That's the type of Ferrari I was referencing when I made the above comment.
Oh, I didn't realize you were talking about a specific model of Ferrari. Keep in mind you said "Ferraris" A more common Ferrari, like you referenced: 328GTB - 166mph and 5.5seconds. Does that fit your requirements? Or is it a supercar?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sliver
My point is this: cars today perform better in every measurable way than their equivalents from the 70s and 80s. Do you agree with that?
Oh, well now that you make your statement far more specific, I'd be inclined to agree with it, in most cases. Had you stated this originally, it would have made much more sense than your previous statement.
woob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2011, 12:45 PM   #110
Traditional_Ale
Franchise Player
 
Traditional_Ale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sliver View Post
You guys have to quit bringing up my hotrod Sienna or Redvan's going to get jealous.

But yeah, since you brought it up, my Sienna would wipe the floor with some Ferraris from a few decades back. Minivans, is there anything they can't do?
Uh...impress women?
__________________

So far, this is the oldest I've been.
Traditional_Ale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2011, 12:47 PM   #111
Sliver
evil of fart
 
Sliver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob View Post
Oh, I didn't realize you were talking about a specific model of Ferrari. Keep in mind you said "Ferraris" A more common Ferrari, like you referenced: 328GTB - 166mph and 5.5seconds. Does that fit your requirements? Or is it a supercar?

Oh, well now that you make your statement far more specific, I'd be inclined to agree with it, in most cases. Had you stated this originally, it would have made much more sense than your previous statement.
Well if you hadn't edited almost every post to make this conversation borderline impossible we probably would've found common ground much sooner.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Traditional_Ale View Post
Uh...impress women?
Ahh, that ship sailed long ago. I'm married with two boat anchors.
Sliver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2011, 12:50 PM   #112
Bill Bumface
My face is a bum!
 
Bill Bumface's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob View Post
328GTB - 166mph and 5.5seconds. Does that fit your requirements? Or is it a supercar?
5.5 seconds is now slow for a hot hatchback, let alone a Ferrari.

He is right.

Just stop.
Bill Bumface is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bill Bumface For This Useful Post:
Old 11-01-2011, 12:50 PM   #113
Traditional_Ale
Franchise Player
 
Traditional_Ale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sliver View Post
Ahh, that ship sailed long ago. I'm married with two boat anchors.
Holy crap, you can tow boat anchors with a Sienna? Or you married two fat chicks?
__________________

So far, this is the oldest I've been.
Traditional_Ale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2011, 12:51 PM   #114
AMG_G
Scoring Winger
 
AMG_G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Exp:
Default

Yes all you need to do is take off the summer rims and put on the winter rims, torque to spec and check the tire pressure. For some strange reason people think they need to re-balance the tires but you only need to re-balance a tire if you take it off the rim or a weight falls off.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mykalberta View Post
Ok not a geek queston...

If you have winter tires on separate rims, can you simply take your summers off and put your winters on without issue if you have a torque wrench etc?
AMG_G is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to AMG_G For This Useful Post:
Old 11-01-2011, 12:52 PM   #115
woob
#1 Goaltender
 
woob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sliver View Post
Well if you hadn't edited almost every post to make this conversation borderline impossible we probably would've found common ground much sooner.
Hahaha, you think what you will. Had I been more prepared I would have refuted it in my first reply. Would that have made your original statement appear any less ridiculous than me showing that it was through more than one reply? I think not
woob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2011, 12:55 PM   #116
woob
#1 Goaltender
 
woob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hulkrogan View Post
5.5 seconds is now slow for a hot hatchback, let alone a Ferrari.

He is right.

Just stop.
I believe we're on a message board, open to discussion and debate. But thanks for your input!
woob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2011, 05:00 PM   #117
GreatWhiteEbola
First Line Centre
 
GreatWhiteEbola's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Sports cars are judged by their peers in their given era. By Sliver's logic we can't even classify a car today because it might not fit that criteria tomorrow. Asinine.
__________________


Last edited by GreatWhiteEbola; 11-01-2011 at 05:21 PM.
GreatWhiteEbola is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GreatWhiteEbola For This Useful Post:
Old 11-01-2011, 05:05 PM   #118
Bill Bumface
My face is a bum!
 
Bill Bumface's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Exp:
Default

I forgot to add to this thread that I got a ride in a Tesla Roadster Sunday.

WOW.

I've never felt acceleration like that. So instant! It's totally like riding in a super-powered golf cart. The throttle goes down, and instant peak power. It's amazing! A very, very cool vehicle.
Bill Bumface is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Bill Bumface For This Useful Post:
Old 11-01-2011, 06:02 PM   #119
Sliver
evil of fart
 
Sliver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GreatWhiteEbola View Post
Sports cars are judged by their peers in their given era. By Sliver's logic we can't even classify a car today because it might not fit that criteria tomorrow. Asinine.
Maybe re-read what I wrote. That's not what I said at all.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sliver View Post
I think I should rephrase my point on that. 70s/80s Ferraris were sports cars in the 70s/80s. To ask, "are 70s/80s Ferraris sports cars" isn't easy to answer without changing the question. I think a better answer than the one I previously gave is they certainly were at the time, but compared to today's sports cars they fall short in every possible way.
Sliver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 07:43 AM   #120
Ironhorse
Franchise Player
 
Ironhorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I think I'll just leave this freakshow here.


Ironhorse is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:01 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy