Curious why of our three young Dmen, people toss around the name Kylington in trade proposals like he's a throw in.
He's already an NHLer and has borderline elite skating. He's not a throw in, nor is he degrees less good than Andersson and Valimaki. I think all three are as close to untouchable as it gets, unless the return is a star player (Stone) extended. I'd rather add an extra pick to the deal than lose of those three kids.
Literally no one has mentioned Kylington as a throw in, you're not comprehending the discussion. Kylington would be the main piece and a huge piece to give up on our end.
He's a step below Valimaki in terms of trade value, but many think he'd be valuable enough to land Mark Stone. Nobody was suggesting he's a throw in. You just got overexcited while reading, I guess.
Burke seemed to imply Vegas' reserve list isn't as strong as Boston or Calgary (assuming that's which teams he was referring to when he said " a couple other teams")
__________________
"May those who accept their fate find happiness. May those who defy it find glory."
It was the beginning of his first pro season and he made the team. A GOOD team. And he showed quite a bit IMO, I really liked his game. He was outmatched at times (no surprise) and he was snake-bitten, but to say he didn't show much is baffling.
Dube is a great prospect. And I would bet that he is on the team full time by next season.
Imma have a really big hate on for the Knights if they get Stone
Perhaps.
If we stand pat after this trade deadline, I think it's going to be very important to finish first overall in the West. Tossing SJ and Vegas into the 3-6 melee will help us in the long run.
This is an arms race between Calgary, Nashville, and Vegas in the West. I don't see Boston being able to out-bid the three Western teams because of that.
