Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-26-2023, 11:25 AM   #11421
ah123
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Here
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bluejays View Post
Who wouldn’t? I’m not sure you’d get that much but if a first and a mid prospect are part of the package it’s hard to say no

Hanifin is a top four D at worst, and the trading team gets him for two playoffs if they can’t extend him. That should net a top prospect + higher round picks for him. IMO, Flames should be focused on acquiring prospects who might make the big club next year, rather than first round picks
ah123 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ah123 For This Useful Post:
Old 02-26-2023, 11:29 AM   #11422
Moneyhands23
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: victoria
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ah123 View Post
Hanifin is a top four D at worst, and the trading team gets him for two playoffs if they can’t extend him. That should net a top prospect + higher round picks for him. IMO, Flames should be focused on acquiring prospects who might make the big club next year, rather than first round picks
Yup, I can certainly get on board with that approach

Can we say Forsberg for Erat!!!
Moneyhands23 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Moneyhands23 For This Useful Post:
Old 02-26-2023, 11:30 AM   #11423
McG
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Elbows Up!!
Exp:
Default

I’ve seen similar situations in the corporate world. It’s not hockey, but it is a scenario.

Treliving was given the opportunity to leave last off season or try to win a contract this season. He chose to stay. Most would. I thought that Treliving did the best that he could last summer.

Sutter was brought in to help stabilize the team; he did that but I would say that the players that were brought in are not Sutter style players. I keep thinking that Sutter gets out coached but it’s a lot of the wrong players on the ice.

One scenario that I see is that the season plays out. Treliving is not in complete control. Treliving not renewed. New GM brought in and demands total control. Rebuilds entire hockey operations. Sutter gone as GM brings in new coaches. I think that Coach Q gets a long look for coach. He worked with the former panthers players.

New GM demands contract commitment from UFAs that he wants to keep. Trades ones that he doesn’t want and trades ones that won’t sign. Treliving should have done that but never ever did.

Treliving is gone before the draft.

Predictions? Lombardi as GM and Quenneville as coach.
__________________
Franchise > Team > Player

Future historians will celebrate June 24, 2024 as the date when the timeline corrected itself.

Last edited by McG; 02-26-2023 at 11:50 AM. Reason: Misspelled Quenneville
McG is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to McG For This Useful Post:
Old 02-26-2023, 11:32 AM   #11424
bluejays
Franchise Player
 
bluejays's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ah123 View Post
Hanifin is a top four D at worst, and the trading team gets him for two playoffs if they can’t extend him. That should net a top prospect + higher round picks for him. IMO, Flames should be focused on acquiring prospects who might make the big club next year, rather than first round picks
The part I’m not sure about is if teams would be willing to do both? First and blue chip prospect. I’m not even sure teams deal blue chippers, period?
bluejays is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2023, 11:35 AM   #11425
Paulie Walnuts
Franchise Player
 
Paulie Walnuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dirk diggler View Post
that scares me, the last time he traded for an "impact" d man was Hamonic. that was awful, we gave up so much for a guy who was no better than a 4th or 5th d man.
He also brought in Dougie Hamilton and traded him and got us younger impact players in Lindholm and Hanifin.

If he could flip Hanifin for Chychurn that would be amazing as he now used thaf asset to get younger and a cost controlled player.

The issue is what the plus would with Hanifin because that doesn't move the needle to get a deal done and I'm not trading any picks or prospects.
Paulie Walnuts is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2023, 11:36 AM   #11426
bluejays
Franchise Player
 
bluejays's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by McG View Post
I’ve seen similar situations in the corporate world. It’s not hockey, but it is a scenario.

Treliving was given the opportunity to leave last off season or try to win a contract this season. He chose to stay. Most would. I thought that Treliving did the best that he could last summer.

Sutter was brought in to help stabilize the team; he did that but I would say that the players that were brought in are not Sutter style players. I keep thinking that Sutter gets out coached but it’s a lot of the wrong players on the ice.

One scenario that I see is that the season plays out. Treliving is not in complete control. Treliving not renewed. New GM brought in and demands total control. Rebuilds entire hockey operations. Sutter gone as GM brings in new coaches. I think that Coach Q gets a long look for coach. He worked with the former panthers players.

New GM demands contract commitment from UFAs that he wants to keep. Trades ones that he doesn’t want and trades ones that won’t sign. Treliving should have done that but never ever did.

Treliving is gone before the draft.

Predictions? Lombardi as GM and Quenville as coach.
I’d be on board with that. Quenneville seemed to be respected by his players. The big Chicago thing aside, I’d have hoped he’s learned his lesson.
bluejays is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to bluejays For This Useful Post:
McG
Old 02-26-2023, 11:37 AM   #11427
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulie Walnuts View Post
He also brought in Dougie Hamilton and traded him and got us younger impact players in Lindholm and Hanifin.

If he could flip Hanifin for Chychurn that would be amazing as he now used thaf asset to get younger and a cost controlled player.

The issue is what the plus would with Hanifin because that doesn't move the needle to get a deal done and I'm not trading any picks or prospects.
The greater issue is that it's not the type of deal Phoenix is looking for.
Jiri Hrdina is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2023, 11:41 AM   #11428
Paulie Walnuts
Franchise Player
 
Paulie Walnuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
The greater issue is that it's not the type of deal Phoenix is looking for.
Haven't paid a lot of attention to what they are looking for. Is it futures?

If so we have the assets to pull it off but we would be left bare.

That's why trading away picks for guys like Forbort Fantenberg and Jarnkrok is bad business.

A team that drafts as well as we have especially in later rounds and we just keep spending those picks.
Paulie Walnuts is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2023, 11:43 AM   #11429
TOfan
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sofa GM View Post
Back to Carolina?
Provided Meier goes to a team other than Carolina, they are the one team I could see making an offer for Lindholm. That said, I think the flames fully intend to extend Lindholm.

If it turns out Lindholm tells the Flames he is going to test the market in a little over a year from now, the Flames would be smart to wait until the summer where they could have several teams pitching offers.

I don’t see Lindholm being moved at the deadline under any plausible scenario.
TOfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2023, 11:48 AM   #11430
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulie Walnuts View Post
Haven't paid a lot of attention to what they are looking for. Is it futures?

If so we have the assets to pull it off but we would be left bare.

That's why trading away picks for guys like Forbort Fantenberg and Jarnkrok is bad business.

A team that drafts as well as we have especially in later rounds and we just keep spending those picks.
Phoenix is looking to trade Chychrun to get cheaper and younger with more team control. Been reporting a million times since he went on the market.

Hanifin is the opposite of what they are looking for. One year to UFA.
The Cobra is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2023, 11:54 AM   #11431
TOfan
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ah123 View Post
Hanifin is a top four D at worst, and the trading team gets him for two playoffs if they can’t extend him. That should net a top prospect + higher round picks for him. IMO, Flames should be focused on acquiring prospects who might make the big club next year, rather than first round picks
Wasn’t Friedman saying last night that the market for defence men is saturated right now? Seems like the Flames would be selling low if that’s the case.

Again, these are offseason moves. Hanifin is definitely one of the guys from the six headed into UFA seasons the Flames need to know what his intentions are. If he wants to go down south, move him at/before the draft. Do not let that linger.
TOfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2023, 11:57 AM   #11432
Moneyhands23
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: victoria
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TOfan View Post
Wasn’t Friedman saying last night that the market for defence men is saturated right now? Seems like the Flames would be selling low if that’s the case.

Again, these are offseason moves. Hanifin is definitely one of the guys from the six headed into UFA seasons the Flames need to know what his intentions are. If he wants to go down south, move him at/before the draft. Do not let that linger.
Tanev is the guy I'd try and move
Moneyhands23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2023, 11:57 AM   #11433
Burn13
Scoring Winger
 
Burn13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Behind you.
Exp:
Default

Mangiapane is who I see with value that could move, 2yrs remaining $5.8M and has no NTC. Make some space on the wing for Duehr, or another winger on farm next year. Down year. Dube has taken a step this year making Mangiapane expendable and is $3.5M less a year.

Mangiapane return, not sure like Niederreitter? but 1 more year or term and $1.8M more/year? 2nd round + mid prospect?
Burn13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2023, 11:58 AM   #11434
TOfan
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra View Post
Phoenix is looking to trade Chychrun to get cheaper and younger with more team control. Been reporting a million times since he went on the market.

Hanifin is the opposite of what they are looking for. One year to UFA.
Also, why would Arizona do this? They have had Chychrun on the market for at least a year and, apparently, no one has met their ask.

Why would they think they can get more for a relatively comparable player who is older, makes more, and has less control? Never mind all along they’ve been asking for picks/prospects for Chychrun.
TOfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2023, 12:00 PM   #11435
TOfan
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Burn13 View Post
Mangiapane is who I see with value that could move, 2yrs remaining $5.8M and has no NTC. Make some space on the wing for Duehr, or another winger on farm next year. Down year. Dube has taken a step this year making Mangiapane expendable and is $3.5M less a year.

Mangiapane return, not sure like Niederreitter? but 1 more year or term and $1.8M more/year? 2nd round + mid prospect?
Makes no sense.

Flames have needed to add a top6 winger all year. Why would they get rid of one? Because he’s had a down year? If you’re trading Mang it’s a hockey trade, not for futures.
TOfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2023, 12:01 PM   #11436
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulie Walnuts View Post
Haven't paid a lot of attention to what they are looking for. Is it futures?

If so we have the assets to pull it off but we would be left bare.

That's why trading away picks for guys like Forbort Fantenberg and Jarnkrok is bad business.

A team that drafts as well as we have especially in later rounds and we just keep spending those picks.
The Jarnkrok deal was fine. The team seemed like it was one that could go on a run and investing in it to give it a chance was a sound decision.

Everyone was hot to trot on him and crying for the Flames to go and get him.
Jiri Hrdina is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
Old 02-26-2023, 12:03 PM   #11437
Bunk
Franchise Player
 
Bunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Exp:
Default

Flames will beat Boston and maybe Boston and Toronto, because of course, and then they will fool themselves into thinking they can compete, and will avoid being a seller, and might even pick up depth, spending some assets.
__________________
Trust the snake.
Bunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2023, 12:04 PM   #11438
TOfan
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moneyhands23 View Post
Tanev is the guy I'd try and move
But why and what are you getting for him? the Flames can go ahead and tell another team they want a first back but if the other team doesn’t like it, they could just move on and talk to the Jackets about Gravikov, or the Blackhawks about McCabe, or……..

Further if the Flames do move Tanev, do they have a RHS D in the wings ready to take that spot? Not as far as I know.

Last edited by TOfan; 02-26-2023 at 12:07 PM.
TOfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2023, 12:08 PM   #11439
howard_the_duck
#1 Goaltender
 
howard_the_duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TOfan View Post
But why and what are you getting for him? It’s not like the Flames can go ahead and tell another team they want a first back but if the other team doesn’t like it, they could just move on and talk to the Jackets about Gravikov, or the Blackhawks about McCabe, or……..

Further if the Flames do move Tanev, do they have a RHS D in the wings ready to take that spot? Not as far as I know.
I think the logic behind a Tanev trade is he’s a much better player than the two alternatives mentioned here. So you’d potentially get a 1st ++.

I think there’s no chance he’s moved. Beloved in that room and a culture setter for whatever the team does next.
howard_the_duck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2023, 12:11 PM   #11440
saillias
#1 Goaltender
 
saillias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bunk View Post
Flames will beat Boston and maybe Boston and Toronto, because of course, and then they will fool themselves into thinking they can compete, and will avoid being a seller, and might even pick up depth, spending some assets.
This team is 19th in the league in points percentage now. 10th in the west. Doubt it. I don't think they're as adverse to selling as some think. Tre has been pragmatic in the past.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobHopper View Post
The thing is, my posts, thoughts and insights may be my opinions but they're also quite factual.
saillias is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:14 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy