Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-06-2023, 12:06 PM   #1101
D as in David
Franchise Player
 
D as in David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Exp:
Default

That's likely an ATC mistake, right? How long would it take for the landing plane to cover 3 miles? Doesn't seem like enough time for the departing plane to position itself on the runway and then take-off. Did the controller think they were already on the runway and not short of it?
D as in David is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2023, 12:18 PM   #1102
BlackArcher101
Such a pretty girl!
 
BlackArcher101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by D as in David View Post
That's likely an ATC mistake, right? How long would it take for the landing plane to cover 3 miles? Doesn't seem like enough time for the departing plane to position itself on the runway and then take-off. Did the controller think they were already on the runway and not short of it?
Definitely an ATC mistake yes. Even on a good day letting that 737 go in front of a plane on a 3 mile final is a no-go. If you do, you tell them to do it with no delay, which he didn't even do. To make it worse, it's a heavy on a CAT3 landing, so the pilots in the Fedex aren't even looking out the window, they are glued to their instruments.

It sounds like Austin airport doesn't even have ability to track planes on the ground in low vis as well, as he had to ask if they were rolling. The whole thing goes against so many best practices. I have no idea why ATC felt the pressure the let Southwest go.
__________________
BlackArcher101 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to BlackArcher101 For This Useful Post:
Old 02-06-2023, 12:18 PM   #1103
Bigtime
Franchise Player
 
Bigtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I wonder if ATC had asked if SouthWest was ready for an expedited departure if that would have made a difference? They certainly took their time to get rolling, even after knowing that there was traffic on a 3 mile final.

Edit: BlackArcher101 sums up what I was thinking. Atlas Air pilot and great twitter follow Miami Rick with some thoughts too:

https://twitter.com/user/status/1622461175098400768
Bigtime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2023, 12:21 PM   #1104
BlackArcher101
Such a pretty girl!
 
BlackArcher101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

And assuming 140 kts approach speed, 3nm is covered in less than 1.5min. Definitely not enough time for Southwest to taxi into position and get clear.
__________________
BlackArcher101 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to BlackArcher101 For This Useful Post:
Old 02-06-2023, 01:44 PM   #1105
Lubicon
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackArcher101 View Post
It sounds like Austin airport doesn't even have ability to track planes on the ground in low vis as well, as he had to ask if they were rolling. The whole thing goes against so many best practices. I have no idea why ATC felt the pressure the let Southwest go.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigtime View Post
I wonder if ATC had asked if SouthWest was ready for an expedited departure if that would have made a difference? They certainly took their time to get rolling, even after knowing that there was traffic on a 3 mile final.
Listening to the recording SouthWest called they were ready to go when they contacted tower. Not an excuse but I'm sure ATC assumed they were really ready to go and wouldn't meander onto the runway and then sit there while they spooled up the engines.
Lubicon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2023, 02:08 PM   #1106
Bigtime
Franchise Player
 
Bigtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Sounds like they got within 100' of each other...

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/0...x-faa-00081369
Bigtime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2023, 04:26 PM   #1107
timun
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Whoopsadaisy...

Butt-puckering moment for the FedEx guys, I'm sure. "ILS" I know means "Instrument Landing System", so "Cat III" I presume means atrocious weather conditions, worst of the worst, and the FedEx guys not being able to see the runway—and by extension the Southwest plane—clearly on approach? And if the FedEx plane was using ILS, I presume by extension the tower could visually see neither that plane on approach nor the Southwest plane still on the ground?
timun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2023, 08:39 AM   #1108
Bigtime
Franchise Player
 
Bigtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Fantastic shots of an F-35 exiting the Mach loop:

https://twitter.com/user/status/1623359993855586306
Bigtime is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Bigtime For This Useful Post:
Old 02-12-2023, 12:18 PM   #1109
Bigtime
Franchise Player
 
Bigtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Yikes...pulled almost 2.7G's in the recovery and climb out.

https://twitter.com/user/status/1624842649286082562
Bigtime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2023, 09:13 AM   #1110
Bigtime
Franchise Player
 
Bigtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Rumour not confirmed, but over on another site word is a new Captain to the 777 with a brand new F/O. Flaps were retracted from 20 to fully up, which could cause this to occur.
Bigtime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2023, 08:54 AM   #1111
Bigtime
Franchise Player
 
Bigtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Move over winglets, riblets are coming.

https://twitter.com/user/status/1625504018704523264

Quote:
Just 500 m2 of AeroSHARK reduced the Boeing 747-400’s fuel burn by 0.8%. With the aircraft type slated for retirement at Lufthansa in a couple years, Lufthansa Technik in 2021 began working towards an EASA AeroSHARK supplemental type certificate (STC) for the Boeing 777.
Bigtime is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bigtime For This Useful Post:
Old 02-15-2023, 06:08 PM   #1112
KelVarnsen
Franchise Player
 
KelVarnsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Apartment 5A
Exp:
Default

I read that as ribwich
KelVarnsen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2023, 11:40 AM   #1113
KTrain
ALL ABOARD!
 
KTrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Exp:
Default


Click to enlarge
KTrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2023, 11:45 AM   #1114
Fuzz
Franchise Player
 
Fuzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
Exp:
Default

Good luck if you have a Boise Babe, though.
Fuzz is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2023, 11:47 AM   #1115
Maritime Q-Scout
Ben
 
Maritime Q-Scout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: God's Country (aka Cape Breton Island)
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KTrain View Post

Click to enlarge
Sure that advertising campaign is edgy... yes those prices are foolishing low... but holy crap look at that route map! Here's zero presence in the north west; barely a presence west of the Mississippi.

Here's a route map from 2015 for comparison:

Spoiler!


Also just noticing no trans-continental flights either. Boggles the mind there's no LAX-JFK/EWR/LGA flights.
__________________

"Calgary Flames is the best team in all the land" - My Brainwashed Son

Last edited by Maritime Q-Scout; 02-21-2023 at 11:50 AM.
Maritime Q-Scout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2023, 02:30 PM   #1116
Bigtime
Franchise Player
 
Bigtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Was the Delta ad from pre-deregulation days? That would explain the lack of NW and things like no trans-cons either. Deregulation changed everything.
Bigtime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2023, 02:35 PM   #1117
Fuzz
Franchise Player
 
Fuzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigtime View Post
Was the Delta ad from pre-deregulation days? That would explain the lack of NW and things like no trans-cons either. Deregulation changed everything.
This says it is from 1973, so ya. But prices were also typically higher then.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/1973-DELTA-...-/282856805248
Fuzz is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2023, 05:10 PM   #1118
Maritime Q-Scout
Ben
 
Maritime Q-Scout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: God's Country (aka Cape Breton Island)
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigtime View Post
Was the Delta ad from pre-deregulation days? That would explain the lack of NW and things like no trans-cons either. Deregulation changed everything.
Oh 100% it's this. It's just so hard to wrap your head around now.

Like listening to the business wars series on SouthWest. Started in the regulation days, but was wholly in Texas so the federal regs didn't apply.
__________________

"Calgary Flames is the best team in all the land" - My Brainwashed Son
Maritime Q-Scout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2023, 11:11 AM   #1119
Lubicon
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Exp:
Default

YYZ placing capacity caps not only on movements but also on numbers of passengers (ie aircraft size) during March break and summer. So airlines won't be able to upguage aircraft size to make up for movement limits. It's a two edge sword, this might help with delays but capping capacity (supply) can also lead to price increases if demand outpaces supply.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toron...gtaa-1.6762726
Lubicon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2023, 01:40 PM   #1120
Bigtime
Franchise Player
 
Bigtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Pour one out for the Mitsubishi Regional Jet:

https://twitter.com/user/status/1633561916298891264
Bigtime is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:33 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy