02-24-2015, 12:45 AM
|
#1101
|
Acerbic Cyberbully
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist
That's exactly my theory. Small guys like Gaudreau don't grind it out in the trenches. That's where a lot of those injuries happen.
Kane is small, Toews is bigger. I'd bet Toews gets hurt more simply for to play style...
|
There may also be an added advantage to being a small player that stems from an aggressive sports culture. Perhaps players like Gaudreau avoid hits with greater ease because larger players are not as intent on hitting them. The best hockey hits are those by big players on even bigger players. Is there a part of hitting above one's own weight class that plays in to how a player targets the opposition?
|
|
|
02-24-2015, 12:57 AM
|
#1102
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Nanaimo
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic
More to this point, I believe that Bennett has also grown an inch since the draft. I think he is 6'1" now, no?
|
Jg is listed at 5'9" and Bennet is still listed at 6'.
|
|
|
02-24-2015, 01:30 AM
|
#1103
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by combustiblefuel
Jg is listed at 5'9" and Bennet is still listed at 6'.
|
Bennet t measured 185 cm at training camp which is just a shade under 6'1.
|
|
|
02-24-2015, 01:43 AM
|
#1104
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by combustiblefuel
Jg is listed at 5'9" and Bennet is still listed at 6'.
|
It's a well known fact that 'official' height and weight listings aren't that accurate. Often times the NHL statistics tables are updated only when a player is drafted and then players spend their entire careers listed at their draft height and weight.
Bennett was 6'0.25" when he was drafted 7-8 months ago. He's 18 and still growing, so by now it's feasible that he's 6'1". Bob McKenzie had him at 6'1" in all his draft profiles. FWIW his Wikipedia page has him listed at 6'1", 196lbs – which is in line with what Treliving said about Sam recently adding 15lbs of muscle. Another 10 lbs and Sam is going to be Iginla-sized.
And we all know Johnny Hockey is only 5'9" while he's wearing skates
|
|
|
02-24-2015, 01:46 AM
|
#1105
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlameZilla
And we all know Johnny Hockey is only 5'9" while he's wearing skates 
|
And standing on the box the skates came in.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Jay Random For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-24-2015, 09:14 AM
|
#1106
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Random
And standing on the box the skates came in.
|
And pre-haircut.
|
|
|
02-24-2015, 09:20 AM
|
#1107
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic
There may also be an added advantage to being a small player that stems from an aggressive sports culture. Perhaps players like Gaudreau avoid hits with greater ease because larger players are not as intent on hitting them. The best hockey hits are those by big players on even bigger players. Is there a part of hitting above one's own weight class that plays in to how a player targets the opposition?
|
I think the biggest part of it is that since Gaudreau has always been smaller than most other players, he has developed a style where he is hard to hit, which being more of a shifty guy. When you watch him, sometimes the image that comes to mind is Ali employing the "rope a dope" tactic - he holds the puck, knows where his options are and how the play is unfolding, then avoids a check and makes a play after that defender has committed to him - he dares them to hit him and gets away
|
|
|
02-24-2015, 09:22 AM
|
#1108
|
Acerbic Cyberbully
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
|
^
I totally agree about Gaudreau. I was making the argument about small players more generally.
|
|
|
02-24-2015, 09:41 AM
|
#1109
|
Franchise Player
|
So are Flames fans no longer going to care about the size of NHL players and prospects anymore? No longer mock small, skilled players and prospects from other teams, because being small can actually be an advantage in the NHL? Or are the merits of being small unique to Johnny Gaudreau?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
|
|
|
|
02-24-2015, 09:46 AM
|
#1110
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher
So are Flames fans no longer going to care about the size of NHL players and prospects anymore? No longer mock small, skilled players and prospects from other teams, because being small can actually be an advantage in the NHL? Or are the merits of being small unique to Johnny Gaudreau?
|
Was this a thing? I never noticed it. Who was it directed at (Oilers don't count because we will mock them no matter what).
In general, though, team size matters IMO. Of course there are exceptions, but the skill set to make a small guy successful is pretty rare.
|
|
|
02-24-2015, 09:54 AM
|
#1111
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
Was this a thing? I never noticed it. Who was it directed at (Oilers don't count because we will mock them no matter what).
In general, though, team size matters IMO. Of course there are exceptions, but the skill set to make a small guy successful is pretty rare.
|
Half of CliffFletcher's posts on Calgarypuck are trying to prove what hypocritical dumb dumbs we all are. Yesterday was about parroting our GM, today it's liking small players.
He doesn't get that being a sports fan and taking jabs at other teams, regardless of hypocrisy, is all part of the fun. F. U. N. fun. It's an obsession for the guy. Don't take it away from him.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to MrMastodonFarm For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-24-2015, 10:01 AM
|
#1112
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Well, I didn't think the fact we are all hypocritical dummies needed proving.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-24-2015, 10:20 AM
|
#1113
|
Our Jessica Fletcher
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by T@T
Bennett measured 185 cm at training camp which is just a shade under 6'1.
|
Are you sure? 185cm is exactly 6'2''.
|
|
|
02-24-2015, 10:54 AM
|
#1114
|
Franchise Player
|
no, 185 cm is 72. 8 inches, which is almost 6'1
__________________
"OOOOOOHHHHHHH those Russians" - Boney M
|
|
|
02-24-2015, 11:00 AM
|
#1115
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlameZilla
It's a well known fact that 'official' height and weight listings aren't that accurate. Often times the NHL statistics tables are updated only when a player is drafted and then players spend their entire careers listed at their draft height and weight.
Bennett was 6'0.25" when he was drafted 7-8 months ago. He's 18 and still growing, so by now it's feasible that he's 6'1". Bob McKenzie had him at 6'1" in all his draft profiles. FWIW his Wikipedia page has him listed at 6'1", 196lbs – which is in line with what Treliving said about Sam recently adding 15lbs of muscle. Another 10 lbs and Sam is going to be Iginla-sized.
And we all know Johnny Hockey is only 5'9" while he's wearing skates 
|
Kind of funny that when you think about it Bennett was 7 months younger then Draisaitl and is now just getting to the same age that Draisaitl was back at the draft. I wonder if Bennett was 196 at the draft if Edmonton takes him instead of Draisaitl.
That was off topic, anyways I think JG is acclimatizing just fine.
|
|
|
02-24-2015, 11:02 AM
|
#1116
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by killer_carlson
no, 185 cm is 72. 8 inches, which is almost 6'1
|
This is the correct conversion - 1 inch = 2.54cm, though a lot of people round to 2.5cm which brings the error
|
|
|
02-24-2015, 11:11 AM
|
#1117
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: STH since 2002
|
I wish Hartley would match up his D pairing more suitable to the situation when Johnny and Hudler are on the ice.
Too many times it is Engelland and Diaz and those 2 bricks dump the puck in poorly and expect Johnny and Hudler to out battle in the corners. And too often recently they are both getting knocked around.
Up until a month ago Gio, Brodie, Russell and Wideman were their D and all 4 of them make plays directly to Johnny and Hudler. They draw attention away from G&H allowing them to do what they do best. Create scoring chances.
Engelland and Diaz are neither playmaking D. They panic make suicide passes and poorly placed dump ins.
I wish the the coaches would keep them away from the small Johnny Hudler line.
__________________
Last edited by Stay Golden; 02-24-2015 at 11:15 AM.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Stay Golden For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-24-2015, 11:12 AM
|
#1118
|
Our Jessica Fletcher
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Imported_Aussie
This is the correct conversion - 1 inch = 2.54cm, though a lot of people round to 2.5cm which brings the error
|
This was my math. Apologies
|
|
|
02-24-2015, 11:14 AM
|
#1119
|
Could Care Less
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm
Half of CliffFletcher's posts on Calgarypuck are trying to prove what hypocritical dumb dumbs we all are. Yesterday was about parroting our GM, today it's liking small players.
He doesn't get that being a sports fan and taking jabs at other teams, regardless of hypocrisy, is all part of the fun. F. U. N. fun. It's an obsession for the guy. Don't take it away from him.
|
Oh ya was he the one saying that when it comes to the Flames, everything becomes 100% unopposed homerism on this forum? Lol
|
|
|
02-24-2015, 11:18 AM
|
#1120
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stay Golden
I wish Hartley would match up his D pairing more suitable to the situation when Johnny and Hudler are on the ice.
Too many times it is Engelland and Diaz and those 2 bricks dump the puck in poorly and expect Johnny and Hudler to out battle in the corners. And too often recently they are both getting knocked around.
Up until a month ago Gio, Brodie, Russell and Wideman were their D and all 4 of them make plays directly to Johnny and Hudler. They draw attention away from G&H allowing them to do what they do best. Create scoring chances.
Engelland and Diaz are neither playmaking D. They panic make suicide passes and poorly placed dump ins.
I wish the the coaches would keep them away from the small Johnny Hudler line.
|
+1. Johnny also likes to draw defenders in and pass to the point. I would rather have Gio or Brodie there than Engelland or Diaz
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:18 AM.
|
|