Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-24-2015, 12:45 AM   #1101
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist View Post
That's exactly my theory. Small guys like Gaudreau don't grind it out in the trenches. That's where a lot of those injuries happen.

Kane is small, Toews is bigger. I'd bet Toews gets hurt more simply for to play style...
There may also be an added advantage to being a small player that stems from an aggressive sports culture. Perhaps players like Gaudreau avoid hits with greater ease because larger players are not as intent on hitting them. The best hockey hits are those by big players on even bigger players. Is there a part of hitting above one's own weight class that plays in to how a player targets the opposition?
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2015, 12:57 AM   #1102
combustiblefuel
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Nanaimo
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic View Post
More to this point, I believe that Bennett has also grown an inch since the draft. I think he is 6'1" now, no?
Jg is listed at 5'9" and Bennet is still listed at 6'.
combustiblefuel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2015, 01:30 AM   #1103
T@T
Lifetime Suspension
 
T@T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by combustiblefuel View Post
Jg is listed at 5'9" and Bennet is still listed at 6'.
Bennett measured 185 cm at training camp which is just a shade under 6'1.
T@T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2015, 01:43 AM   #1104
FlameZilla
First Line Centre
 
FlameZilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by combustiblefuel View Post
Jg is listed at 5'9" and Bennet is still listed at 6'.
It's a well known fact that 'official' height and weight listings aren't that accurate. Often times the NHL statistics tables are updated only when a player is drafted and then players spend their entire careers listed at their draft height and weight.

Bennett was 6'0.25" when he was drafted 7-8 months ago. He's 18 and still growing, so by now it's feasible that he's 6'1". Bob McKenzie had him at 6'1" in all his draft profiles. FWIW his Wikipedia page has him listed at 6'1", 196lbs – which is in line with what Treliving said about Sam recently adding 15lbs of muscle. Another 10 lbs and Sam is going to be Iginla-sized.

And we all know Johnny Hockey is only 5'9" while he's wearing skates
FlameZilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2015, 01:46 AM   #1105
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlameZilla View Post
And we all know Johnny Hockey is only 5'9" while he's wearing skates
And standing on the box the skates came in.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Jay Random For This Useful Post:
Old 02-24-2015, 09:14 AM   #1106
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Random View Post
And standing on the box the skates came in.
And pre-haircut.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2015, 09:20 AM   #1107
Imported_Aussie
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic View Post
There may also be an added advantage to being a small player that stems from an aggressive sports culture. Perhaps players like Gaudreau avoid hits with greater ease because larger players are not as intent on hitting them. The best hockey hits are those by big players on even bigger players. Is there a part of hitting above one's own weight class that plays in to how a player targets the opposition?
I think the biggest part of it is that since Gaudreau has always been smaller than most other players, he has developed a style where he is hard to hit, which being more of a shifty guy. When you watch him, sometimes the image that comes to mind is Ali employing the "rope a dope" tactic - he holds the puck, knows where his options are and how the play is unfolding, then avoids a check and makes a play after that defender has committed to him - he dares them to hit him and gets away
Imported_Aussie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2015, 09:22 AM   #1108
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

^
I totally agree about Gaudreau. I was making the argument about small players more generally.
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2015, 09:41 AM   #1109
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

So are Flames fans no longer going to care about the size of NHL players and prospects anymore? No longer mock small, skilled players and prospects from other teams, because being small can actually be an advantage in the NHL? Or are the merits of being small unique to Johnny Gaudreau?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2015, 09:46 AM   #1110
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
So are Flames fans no longer going to care about the size of NHL players and prospects anymore? No longer mock small, skilled players and prospects from other teams, because being small can actually be an advantage in the NHL? Or are the merits of being small unique to Johnny Gaudreau?
Was this a thing? I never noticed it. Who was it directed at (Oilers don't count because we will mock them no matter what).

In general, though, team size matters IMO. Of course there are exceptions, but the skill set to make a small guy successful is pretty rare.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2015, 09:54 AM   #1111
MrMastodonFarm
Lifetime Suspension
 
MrMastodonFarm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
Was this a thing? I never noticed it. Who was it directed at (Oilers don't count because we will mock them no matter what).

In general, though, team size matters IMO. Of course there are exceptions, but the skill set to make a small guy successful is pretty rare.
Half of CliffFletcher's posts on Calgarypuck are trying to prove what hypocritical dumb dumbs we all are. Yesterday was about parroting our GM, today it's liking small players.

He doesn't get that being a sports fan and taking jabs at other teams, regardless of hypocrisy, is all part of the fun. F. U. N. fun. It's an obsession for the guy. Don't take it away from him.
MrMastodonFarm is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to MrMastodonFarm For This Useful Post:
Old 02-24-2015, 10:01 AM   #1112
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Well, I didn't think the fact we are all hypocritical dummies needed proving.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
Old 02-24-2015, 10:20 AM   #1113
The Fonz
Our Jessica Fletcher
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by T@T View Post
Bennett measured 185 cm at training camp which is just a shade under 6'1.
Are you sure? 185cm is exactly 6'2''.
The Fonz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2015, 10:54 AM   #1114
killer_carlson
Franchise Player
 
killer_carlson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

no, 185 cm is 72. 8 inches, which is almost 6'1
__________________
"OOOOOOHHHHHHH those Russians" - Boney M
killer_carlson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2015, 11:00 AM   #1115
Robbob
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlameZilla View Post
It's a well known fact that 'official' height and weight listings aren't that accurate. Often times the NHL statistics tables are updated only when a player is drafted and then players spend their entire careers listed at their draft height and weight.

Bennett was 6'0.25" when he was drafted 7-8 months ago. He's 18 and still growing, so by now it's feasible that he's 6'1". Bob McKenzie had him at 6'1" in all his draft profiles. FWIW his Wikipedia page has him listed at 6'1", 196lbs – which is in line with what Treliving said about Sam recently adding 15lbs of muscle. Another 10 lbs and Sam is going to be Iginla-sized.

And we all know Johnny Hockey is only 5'9" while he's wearing skates
Kind of funny that when you think about it Bennett was 7 months younger then Draisaitl and is now just getting to the same age that Draisaitl was back at the draft. I wonder if Bennett was 196 at the draft if Edmonton takes him instead of Draisaitl.

That was off topic, anyways I think JG is acclimatizing just fine.
Robbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2015, 11:02 AM   #1116
Imported_Aussie
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by killer_carlson View Post
no, 185 cm is 72. 8 inches, which is almost 6'1
This is the correct conversion - 1 inch = 2.54cm, though a lot of people round to 2.5cm which brings the error
Imported_Aussie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2015, 11:11 AM   #1117
Stay Golden
Franchise Player
 
Stay Golden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: STH since 2002
Exp:
Default

I wish Hartley would match up his D pairing more suitable to the situation when Johnny and Hudler are on the ice.
Too many times it is Engelland and Diaz and those 2 bricks dump the puck in poorly and expect Johnny and Hudler to out battle in the corners. And too often recently they are both getting knocked around.
Up until a month ago Gio, Brodie, Russell and Wideman were their D and all 4 of them make plays directly to Johnny and Hudler. They draw attention away from G&H allowing them to do what they do best. Create scoring chances.
Engelland and Diaz are neither playmaking D. They panic make suicide passes and poorly placed dump ins.
I wish the the coaches would keep them away from the small Johnny Hudler line.
__________________

Last edited by Stay Golden; 02-24-2015 at 11:15 AM.
Stay Golden is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Stay Golden For This Useful Post:
Old 02-24-2015, 11:12 AM   #1118
The Fonz
Our Jessica Fletcher
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Imported_Aussie View Post
This is the correct conversion - 1 inch = 2.54cm, though a lot of people round to 2.5cm which brings the error
This was my math. Apologies
The Fonz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2015, 11:14 AM   #1119
heep223
Could Care Less
 
heep223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm View Post
Half of CliffFletcher's posts on Calgarypuck are trying to prove what hypocritical dumb dumbs we all are. Yesterday was about parroting our GM, today it's liking small players.



He doesn't get that being a sports fan and taking jabs at other teams, regardless of hypocrisy, is all part of the fun. F. U. N. fun. It's an obsession for the guy. Don't take it away from him.

Oh ya was he the one saying that when it comes to the Flames, everything becomes 100% unopposed homerism on this forum? Lol
heep223 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2015, 11:18 AM   #1120
northcrunk
#1 Goaltender
 
northcrunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stay Golden View Post
I wish Hartley would match up his D pairing more suitable to the situation when Johnny and Hudler are on the ice.
Too many times it is Engelland and Diaz and those 2 bricks dump the puck in poorly and expect Johnny and Hudler to out battle in the corners. And too often recently they are both getting knocked around.
Up until a month ago Gio, Brodie, Russell and Wideman were their D and all 4 of them make plays directly to Johnny and Hudler. They draw attention away from G&H allowing them to do what they do best. Create scoring chances.
Engelland and Diaz are neither playmaking D. They panic make suicide passes and poorly placed dump ins.
I wish the the coaches would keep them away from the small Johnny Hudler line.
+1. Johnny also likes to draw defenders in and pass to the point. I would rather have Gio or Brodie there than Engelland or Diaz
northcrunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:18 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy