Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-06-2025, 10:07 AM   #11161
HighLifeMan
First Line Centre
 
HighLifeMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Exp:
Default

Just based on the Jones and Dumoulin trades this really does seem like an opportune time to really cash in huge on Andersson.

It's a sellers market and he would be by far and away the most valuable asset available.
HighLifeMan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to HighLifeMan For This Useful Post:
Old 03-06-2025, 10:09 AM   #11162
Muta
Franchise Player
 
Muta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Auckland, NZ
Exp:
Default

If Jones is getting a first and a young NHL-calibre goalie, and Dumoulin is getting a 2nd and a prospect... Andersson should have some pretty crazy value right now by these metrics.
Muta is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Muta For This Useful Post:
Old 03-06-2025, 10:10 AM   #11163
Paulie Walnuts
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Exp:
Default

And at 50% retained he costs 2.25M get another team involved for a 5th at 75% and he is practically free.
Paulie Walnuts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2025, 10:10 AM   #11164
OILFAN #81
Everyone's Favorite Oilfan!
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Jose, California
Exp:
Default

Sharks were offered a 2nd and Drury from Carolina last year for Ferraro and turned it down.

They haven't got that offer since. Draft picks on the table in current offers. Oilers, Stars, Jets, Leafs, Kings among teams who have inquired (not all have put in an offer).
OILFAN #81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2025, 10:11 AM   #11165
Calgary Highlander
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Exp:
Default

Do the prices look higher than last year because the 2025 draft class is perceived to be weaker?
Calgary Highlander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2025, 10:12 AM   #11166
liamenator
First Line Centre
 
liamenator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ottawa
Exp:
Default

If the Flames are as hot for Rantanen as all the smoke suggests, and in the (highly unlikely) scenario they can convince him to sign an extension, there seems to me to be a pretty compelling hockey trade to be made between Calgary and Carolina.

Would Anderson, Vladar ++ be enough for Carolina?
liamenator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2025, 10:15 AM   #11167
Tbull8
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by liamenator View Post
If the Flames are as hot for Rantanen as all the smoke suggests, and in the (highly unlikely) scenario they can convince him to sign an extension, there seems to me to be a pretty compelling hockey trade to be made between Calgary and Carolina.

Would Anderson, Vladar ++ be enough for Carolina?
Doesn’t seem like a great deal for the flames imo…. Just trade Rasmus for a haul, keep the ++ and then go hard after rantanen in the summer. If we don’t get him, oh well
Tbull8 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Tbull8 For This Useful Post:
Old 03-06-2025, 10:16 AM   #11168
YyjFlames
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by liamenator View Post
If the Flames are as hot for Rantanen as all the smoke suggests, and in the (highly unlikely) scenario they can convince him to sign an extension, there seems to me to be a pretty compelling hockey trade to be made between Calgary and Carolina.

Would Anderson, Vladar ++ be enough for Carolina?
To rent Rantanen for two months...? please no.

Flames' smoke relates to them going after him in the offseason if he becomes a UFA.
YyjFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2025, 10:16 AM   #11169
Sofa GM
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Exp:
Default

I think there is a good chance that the Stars are the team that will land Rantanen. They actually have a good chance to resign him next year as well with Benn coming off the books. Flames could help with further salary retention as well.
Sofa GM is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Sofa GM For This Useful Post:
Old 03-06-2025, 10:19 AM   #11170
topfiverecords
Franchise Player
 
topfiverecords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by YyjFlames View Post
To rent Rantanen for two months...? please no.

Flames' smoke relates to them going after him in the offseason if he becomes a UFA.
Unlikely he becomes UFA.
topfiverecords is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2025, 10:19 AM   #11171
Macho0978
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sofa GM View Post
I think there is a good chance that the Stars are the team that will land Rantanen. They actually have a good chance to resign him next year as well with Benn coming off the books. Flames could help with further salary retention as well.
This makes sense to me. They need an impact player more than a guy like Rasmus.
Macho0978 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2025, 10:20 AM   #11172
OILFAN #81
Everyone's Favorite Oilfan!
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Jose, California
Exp:
Default

Luke Kunin: Sharks ask is a 2nd. Offer on the table right now is a 4th. Sharks waiting to make that move closer to what their ask is.

Nico Sturm: All but gone tomorrow. Not sure of the return but a team has put in an offer.

Unrelated news: If they pick #1, Schaefer will be their choice.
OILFAN #81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2025, 10:20 AM   #11173
Paulie Walnuts
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sofa GM View Post
I think there is a good chance that the Stars are the team that will land Rantanen. They actually have a good chance to resign him next year as well with Benn coming off the books. Flames could help with further salary retention as well.
If he has gone this far I think he tests the market. Lots of team will have space that probably are ready to compete like the Ducks and Sharks.
Paulie Walnuts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2025, 10:22 AM   #11174
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Luke Kunin is terrible
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2025, 10:22 AM   #11175
liamenator
First Line Centre
 
liamenator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ottawa
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by YyjFlames View Post
To rent Rantanen for two months...? please no.

Flames' smoke relates to them going after him in the offseason if he becomes a UFA.

I specifically said it becomes compelling only if the Flames can convince Rantanen to sign an extension (which is, obviously, highly unlikely).
liamenator is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to liamenator For This Useful Post:
Old 03-06-2025, 10:22 AM   #11176
indes
First Line Centre
 
indes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sherwood Park, AB
Exp:
Default

I don't see how Rasmus' value could ever be higher. #3D for 2.25m for two playoff runs is ridiculous. Cmon Conroy, turn him into a potential #1C.
indes is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to indes For This Useful Post:
Old 03-06-2025, 10:24 AM   #11177
Tbull8
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Exp:
Default

Asked this before but wondering again after the Sharks Schaefer note. Lets say the sharks are picking 2/3 and Misa is there. They missed on Schaefer at 1 and offer the pick for Parekh. Do you take it?
Tbull8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2025, 10:25 AM   #11178
Flames67
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OILFAN #81 View Post
Luke Kunin: Sharks ask is a 2nd. Offer on the table right now is a 4th. Sharks waiting to make that move closer to what their ask is.

Nico Sturm: All but gone tomorrow. Not sure of the return but a team has put in an offer.

Unrelated news: If they pick #1, Schaefer will be their choice.
They can’t go #1 though can they? I thought they changed the lottery rules that you can’t have back to back 1OA
Flames67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2025, 10:26 AM   #11179
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames67 View Post
They can’t go #1 though can they? I thought they changed the lottery rules that you can’t have back to back 1OA
The rules are that you can't win more than twice in a 5 year span.

And that's for the 1st overall pick only. If a team finishes 14 and wins the lottery to draft 4th, that doesn't count against the 2 in 5 years.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2025, 10:27 AM   #11180
Tbull8
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
The rules are that you can't win more than twice in a 5 year span.
And apparently the rule is "you cant move up more than twice". So winning the pick as the bottom seed doesnt count....
Tbull8 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Tbull8 For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:22 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy