View Poll Results: How do you feel about the Hamilton trade?
|
Complete Steal!
|
  
|
540 |
58.76% |
Great trade but not sure if it is a homerun.
|
  
|
235 |
25.57% |
Cautiously optimistic that Flames won the trade.
|
  
|
95 |
10.34% |
Even trade for both teams
|
  
|
24 |
2.61% |
Boston will eventually win this trade.
|
  
|
11 |
1.20% |
Rather have the picks.
|
  
|
14 |
1.52% |
06-27-2015, 10:33 AM
|
#1081
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
|
TJ has 5 years left on his deal that is just starting
|
|
|
06-27-2015, 10:42 AM
|
#1082
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AC
|
Ahh, the old canard of "they should have shopped him around more". That is code for "the GM didn't do his job".
Treliving was on the phone right when the season ended, and "Bruins shopping Hamilton" rumours had persisted for a few days already. The second those rumours started, every GM who hadn't already contacted the Bruins should have been on the phone.
We profited because our GM was on the ball while other teams' management was not.
Whether the B's accepted the best offer they did get is an unknown.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Resolute 14 For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-27-2015, 10:59 AM
|
#1083
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Houston, TX
|
Another benefit of this trade is that, suddenly, the Flames prospect pool on D, looks deeper.
Sure it's mostly perception, but, if Wotherspoon and Sieloff both bust, the Flames are fine. Suddenly there is no need for one of the prospects to become a top pair d.
It also doesn't hurt that the Flames picked up D in the second round.
|
|
|
06-27-2015, 11:03 AM
|
#1084
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Neither here nor there
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14
Ahh, the old canard of "they should have shopped him around more". That is code for "the GM didn't do his job".
Treliving was on the phone right when the season ended, and "Bruins shopping Hamilton" rumours had persisted for a few days already. The second those rumours started, every GM who hadn't already contacted the Bruins should have been on the phone.
We profited because our GM was on the ball while other teams' management was not.
Whether the B's accepted the best offer they did get is an unknown.
|
Didn't Treliving joke about how he was always working the phones with other GM's, to the point that he's probably annoying them?
I'm wondering if that's part of the reason he was able to get this deal done. Got the ball rolling quickly with Sweeney and made the deal before most other GM's got a chance.
__________________
"The problem with quotes on the Internet is that it is hard to verify their authenticity" -Abraham Lincoln
|
|
|
06-27-2015, 12:24 PM
|
#1085
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Love this trade for the Flames. Everyone crapping on Sweeney, which is partially justified, need to look at the crappy position Chiarelli left the Bruins in capwise. Even after the trades of Lucic, Savard LTIR and RFA Hamliton, the Bruins now have $12M in cap space. They still need to sign 5 forwards and 2 defencemen plus have one of their minor league goalies play.
Now you can see why the Bruins canned Chiarelli, and he will do the same thing to the Oilers within 2 years.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Beatle17 For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-27-2015, 12:29 PM
|
#1086
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Houston, TX
|
Having seen the price for Hamilton, if Chicago was thinking about moving Seabrook, they had to have backed off.
I would still be willing to offer a similar package for Seabrook if this is the relative market value.
I know it's off topic, but, where were the Blackhawks this weekend? They did nothing to reduce their cap pressure.
|
|
|
06-27-2015, 12:30 PM
|
#1087
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Having seen the price for Hamilton, if Chicago was thinking about moving Seabrook, they had to have backed off.
I would still be willing to offer a similar package for Seabrook if this is the relative market value.
I know it's off topic, but, where were the Blackhawks this weekend? They did nothing to reduce their cap pressure.
|
The Hawks apparently want to wait until after FA frenzy day to maximize their returns as teams lose out on free agents.
|
|
|
06-27-2015, 12:34 PM
|
#1088
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Houston, TX
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79
The Hawks apparently want to wait until after FA frenzy day to maximize their returns as teams lose out on free agents.
|
Hmmm... Interesting strategy. I can't say I agree with that. Everybody knew this was a deep draft, and the draft is always known to be a sellers market(though nobody told Sweeney).
I wonder if that was the strategy going in, or if they saw where the market was set and backed off.
Allegedly they were asking for the moon in return for Sharp.
|
|
|
06-27-2015, 12:54 PM
|
#1089
|
Self-Suspension
|
Something is up with this trade, it doesn't really make sense. The Bruins look to be rebuilding but they still have Bergeron, Erikkson, Campbell, Kelly, Talbot, Chara and Seidenberg. It simply doesn't make sense to go into rebuild mode by trading away their best young player while holding on to 7 players near or post apex. Either Dougie wanted out or he has issues we don't know about because logistically the whole thing looks weird. Why do this?
I can't comprehend it, surely it can't be simple incompetence. No GM is that dumb... let's go into rebuild mode by trading our best young player. Don't make sense. Someone would have taken at least a few of their players. And then they trade Lucic and retain salary... wtf man.
Last edited by AcGold; 06-27-2015 at 12:57 PM.
|
|
|
06-27-2015, 12:55 PM
|
#1090
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sherwood Park, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79
The Hawks apparently want to wait until after FA frenzy day to maximize their returns as teams lose out on free agents.
|
Risky move as the price may go up but suitors will go down
|
|
|
06-27-2015, 01:02 PM
|
#1091
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
http://www.csnne.com/boston-bruins/c...-money-so-soon
Quote:
“The players, and I guess the organization...everybody is within their rights with the way the CBA is. But to me as a coach, I find it very unfortunate that players that have played maybe three years in the league all of a sudden are looking to be up there [in salary] with the top eight players,” said Julien. “I preferred the other way where they worked their way up over the years and had service and everything else.
“But that’s not to say [Hamilton] wasn’t in his right. He was in his right, and he was entitled to do what he did. I’m not standing here blaming him at all. Would we have liked to have kept him? We would have liked to have kept Dougie Hamilton, he’s a good, promising player. But you move on, and you move on in these situations as well.”
Hamilton and his camp had a choice to take less and be part of the team salary structure if he wanted to remain a Bruins, and tacitly uphold the old-school salary system Julien was referring to. It might not be easy or even realistic in today’s NHL to expect players to worry about their money fitting in with team-building, but it also sounds like that is going to be the B’s approach under GM Don Sweeney and the new regime.
|
|
|
|
06-27-2015, 01:04 PM
|
#1092
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: NB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
|
Typical old school Bruins, time to get with the times it's 2015.
|
|
|
06-27-2015, 01:05 PM
|
#1093
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Northern Crater
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
|
So expect them to repeat the Hamilton/Seguin madness with other promising young players in the coming years? I legitimately feel sorry for their fans, that sucks.
|
|
|
06-27-2015, 01:05 PM
|
#1094
|
Backup Goalie
Join Date: Jan 2007
Exp:  
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AcGold
Something is up with this trade...Either Dougie wanted out or he has issues we don't know about because logistically the whole thing looks weird. Why do this?
|
That is exactly what I am trying to comprehend. I have not payed much attention to Hamilton's playing style in the past, so either way I'm not one to judge if he is elite or not. But why would Boston trade this 'stud' for picks? I don't get it. I've been looking online for criticisms of this player and I can't really seem to find anything. Someone somewhere said his IQ is a problem.
Hope he doesn't turn out to be J-Bo part 2.
|
|
|
06-27-2015, 01:06 PM
|
#1095
|
Not the 1 millionth post winnar
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Los Angeles
|
Quote:
Hamilton and his camp had a choice to take less and be part of the team salary structure if he wanted to remain a Bruins, and tacitly uphold the old-school salary system Julien was referring to. It might not be easy or even realistic in today’s NHL to expect players to worry about their money fitting in with team-building, but it also sounds like that is going to be the B’s approach under GM Don Sweeney and the new regime.
|
Get ready to lose a lot of players. Fans in Calgary and Edmonton who remember the 90s know precisely how much loyalty you can expect from players to play with a "team salary structure".
__________________
"Isles give up 3 picks for 5.5 mil of cap space.
Oilers give up a pick and a player to take on 5.5 mil."
-Bax
|
|
|
06-27-2015, 01:13 PM
|
#1096
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sss1
That is exactly what I am trying to comprehend. I have not payed much attention to Hamilton's playing style in the past, so either way I'm not one to judge if he is elite or not. But why would Boston trade this 'stud' for picks? I don't get it. I've been looking online for criticisms of this player and I can't really seem to find anything. Someone somewhere said his IQ is a problem.
Hope he doesn't turn out to be J-Bo part 2.
|
Look at the 3 rather odd first round picks the Bruins made. They left much higher-rated prospects on the board. Whenever I've seen the Bruins play recently, I've been impressed by Hamilton. I'm pretty sure there is a requirement that a team disclose injuries at the time of a trade, or risk having the trade voided by the league.
|
|
|
06-27-2015, 01:24 PM
|
#1097
|
Franchise Player
|
Or, you know, Sweeney's just a complete moron.
__________________
Until the Flames make the Western Finals again, this signature shall remain frozen.
|
|
|
06-27-2015, 01:59 PM
|
#1098
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary
|
I'm somewhere between Option 1 and Option 2. LOVE IT
__________________
|
|
|
06-27-2015, 02:05 PM
|
#1099
|
First Line Centre
|
I wonder if this move, and the comments quoted above,have anything to do with notorious tightwad and hardass Jeremy Jacobs?
__________________
The of and to a in is I that it for you was with on as have but be they
|
|
|
06-27-2015, 02:19 PM
|
#1100
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Right behind you.
|
Interesting perspective from Darren Haynes..
http://flamesfrom80feet.blogspot.ca/...hts-on_27.html
Quote:
Here's a look at the young foundation and (potential) core pieces of the Flames and their ages as of Oct. 1, 2015. Listed youngest to oldest, Hamilton falls right in the middle:
- C Sam Bennett, 19
- RW Emile Poirier, 20
- C Sean Monahan, 20
- G Jon Gillies, 21
- LW Johnny Gaudreau, 22
- D Dougie Hamilton, 22
- C Markus Granlund, 22
- D Tyler Wotherspoon, 22
- LW Micheal Ferland, 23
- G Joni Ortio, 24
- D TJ Brodie, 25
- LW Lance Bouma, 25
- C Mikael Backlund, 26
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:01 AM.
|
|