Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-10-2013, 05:38 PM   #1061
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinordi View Post
I'm not pretending to know who the better prospect is or who the better player is. All I'm saying is that the Flames should be taking the best player not the most marketable and not the most Canadian. Obviously they need to draft a player that they think will have the franchise in their long-term plans but that applies to Mackinnon as well.

Here's a scenario, Mackinnon says in the interview that he actually wants to play out east and be close to his family while Nichushkin wants to be on a team that supports him and provides him with the resources to integrate well into North America.

Perfectly possible scenario. In that case I take the player who I think will be the org and who brings more on the ice.
Yeah... perfectly possible, reasonable, whatever word you want...

History says that you take the Canadian, who won't be a flight risk, who has franchise player potential, who won't bolt once he comes a UFA.
Ashasx is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2013, 05:39 PM   #1062
expatflame
Formerly FlamesFaninChina
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Thailand
Exp:
Default

Can someone post all the Flames current draft picks for 2013 please? Thx
expatflame is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2013, 05:43 PM   #1063
Psytic
First Line Centre
 
Psytic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Seriously though Feaster should not go off the board on this draft. If he does and says " my Assistant GM John Wiesbrod seen this guy play this ONE time and we feel he is going to be something in 4 years" He should be drawn and quartered at city hall. I don't see any reason to gamble at this draft when there is so many can't miss guys. The Flames don't need to go boom bust on this one.
Psytic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2013, 05:44 PM   #1064
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

I think that MacKinnon is the better prospect (just my opinion). And if all else is equal, then I would take the Canadian.

However, I could care less about marketing - that will take care of itself.

And I could care less about next year, it is pretty much a right-off already. Which is fine as the Flames need several core prospects and it will take more than one draft to get them.

I have never understood the 'he can play next year' argument. Who cares? I want the best player career-wise. I want the highest upside. I want someone who can help win a cup or 6.
Enoch Root is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 04-10-2013, 05:44 PM   #1065
Tinordi
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Canada 02 View Post
http://www.tsn.ca/window/podcastcent...id=15185&id=65

Button and others on TSN do a monthly podcast on the draft. Loads of good discussion
Thanks this is good stuff. Button says Jones is now clearly emerging as the best player in the draft, not close anymore.
Tinordi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2013, 05:46 PM   #1066
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinordi View Post
Thanks this is good stuff. Button says Jones is now clearly emerging as the best player in the draft, not close anymore.
With Colorado playing as they are, I'm not even considering Jones as a possibility at this point.
Ashasx is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2013, 05:47 PM   #1067
Igster
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
I have never understood the 'he can play next year' argument. Who cares? I want the best player career-wise. I want the highest upside. I want someone who can help win a cup or 6.
Simply because it would be nice as fans to have something to be excited about next season. That's all, plain and simple. The Flames have never had such a high draft pick. Every draft as a fan, I see them draft players and then really don't hear much about those players for years. It would be nice for once to see them draft a high end prospect that fits into the lineup next season.

Selfish? Sure, but I want to see it just the same.
Igster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2013, 05:48 PM   #1068
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

The only way Jones is available is if we win the lottery.

And if we do, I would still trade down to 2 or 3 to get MacKinnon +

Jones may be the best player today, but I think MacKinnon is more likely to have the better career

Last edited by Enoch Root; 04-10-2013 at 05:54 PM.
Enoch Root is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2013, 05:50 PM   #1069
Dagger
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
Why? Because this team needs to start creating an identity. Right now, it doesn't have one. There's only Baerschi to be excited for next season.

Nichushkin, a Russian, is not a face you can sell as well as MacKinnon, Jones, Drouin, or Barkov. Additionally, despite many scouts ranking Nichushkin 2nd overall, I've seen many more with these 4 locked in the top 4 in some way or another.

Why risk it? You can either take MacKinnon, who is constantly ranked top 3 (many first overall), who is Canadian, captain material, and will no question play in the NHL next season...

...or you can take Nichushkin, who will most likely wait until the 2015-2016 season to make his debut, is less marketable, and really, doesn't have good numbers in the KHL. And that's without mentioning that he's a winger.

I'm not going to act like I've seen Nichushkin play, but there are way too many red flags for a team in our position.
You should watch him. He's a force, if he gets any sort of angle(which he can create himself through shear force) he's gonna get to the net. He absolutely bullied Seth Jones for a goal(he made Jones look like he was Jaybo even though Jones tried getting a few shots in) and then destroyed Carolina 1st rounder Ryan Murphy.

Nichuskin is literally a bull. The same way Drouin can wow you with any of his stickhandling, you watch him and you're just amazed at his strength.



Start at :20 seconds. Alot of his goals are similar in that he'll just easily gain entrance to the zone and then just power to the net and jam it home.

Waiting for this kid would be worth it, I just don't know if you want him in the top 3....but you might have to take him there.
Dagger is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dagger For This Useful Post:
Old 04-10-2013, 05:50 PM   #1070
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Igster View Post
Simply because it would be nice as fans to have something to be excited about next season. That's all, plain and simple. The Flames have never had such a high draft pick. Every draft as a fan, I see them draft players and then really don't hear much about those players for years. It would be nice for once to see them draft a high end prospect that fits into the lineup next season.

Selfish? Sure, but I want to see it just the same.
Well, I am pretty sure you'll get your wish as the top 3 are all NHL-ready.
Enoch Root is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 04-10-2013, 05:51 PM   #1071
Teroy
Scoring Winger
 
Teroy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: B.C.
Exp:
Default

If the Flames have an opportunity to draft Nathan MacKinnon and pass him up it would be foolish.
Teroy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Teroy For This Useful Post:
Old 04-10-2013, 05:52 PM   #1072
Igster
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
Well, I am pretty sure you'll get your wish as the top 3 are all NHL-ready.


I'm hoping.
Igster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2013, 06:33 PM   #1073
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by expatflame View Post
Can someone post all the Flames current draft picks for 2013 please? Thx
As far as I can tell... The Flames have their own pick in the First, Third, Fourth, and Sixth rounds.
  • They traded their own Second to Montreal in the Cammalleri/Bourque deal.
  • They traded their own Fifth to Washington for Wideman's rights.
  • They may have swapped Seventh round picks with Anaheim a couple of years ago when they acquired Logan MacMillan. Each team's seventh picks in 2013 were conditional, but the conditions are unknown. Since neither player involved in the trade did anything with their new team, I'd guess both teams will keep their picks.

Additionally, they have acquired:
  • Pittsburgh's First rounder in the Iginla deal.
  • St. Louis's First rounder in the Bouwmeester deal (assuming the Blues make the playoffs, if they miss, the Flames get St Louis's Fourth rounder in 2013 and First in 2014).
  • Columbus's Fifth rounder in the Comeau deal.
  • Ottawa's Seventh rounder from Chicago in the Karlsson deal.



To break it down...

First Round: CGY, STL (Conditional - likely), PIT
Second Round: None
Third Round: CGY
Fourth Round: CGY, STL (Conditional - unlikely)
Fifth Round: CBJ
Sixth Round: CGY
Seventh Round: CGY/ANA (Conditional - unknown), OTT
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
Old 04-10-2013, 06:38 PM   #1074
Psytic
First Line Centre
 
Psytic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by getbak View Post
As far as I can tell... The Flames have their own pick in the First, Third, Fourth, and Sixth rounds.
  • They traded their own Second to Montreal in the Cammalleri/Bourque deal.
  • They traded their own Fifth to Washington for Wideman's rights.
  • They may have swapped Seventh round picks with Anaheim a couple of years ago when they acquired Logan MacMillan. Each team's seventh picks in 2013 were conditional, but the conditions are unknown. Since neither player involved in the trade did anything with their new team, I'd guess both teams will keep their picks.

Additionally, they have acquired:
  • Pittsburgh's First rounder in the Iginla deal.
  • St. Louis's First rounder in the Bouwmeester deal (assuming the Blues make the playoffs, if they miss, the Flames get St Louis's Fourth rounder in 2013 and First in 2014).
  • Columbus's Fifth rounder in the Comeau deal.
  • Ottawa's Seventh rounder from Chicago in the Karlsson deal.



To break it down...

First Round: CGY, STL (Conditional - likely), PIT
Second Round: None
Third Round: CGY
Fourth Round: CGY, STL (Conditional - unlikely)
Fifth Round: CBJ
Sixth Round: CGY
Seventh Round: CGY/ANA (Conditional - unknown), OTT
hmm so we need to move Tangs or Cammy for a second + prospect then at the draft imo.
Psytic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2013, 06:41 PM   #1075
sun
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Not cheering for losses
Exp:
Default

That 2nd to MTL sure would be nice right now. How's bourque looked this season?
sun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2013, 06:42 PM   #1076
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
Why? Because this team needs to start creating an identity. Right now, it doesn't have one. There's only Baerschi to be excited for next season.
See, I don't get excited about players. I get excited about winning. Or rather, the prospect or building a team good enough to challenge the best in the conference in a playoff series.

I don't believe Canadian teams need to generate excitement around stars. Calgarians love NHL hockey. Our affluent executives love to schmooze clients at NHL hockey games. Whether or not we have a star attraction doesn't really matter much in the overall scheme of things.

I'm not overlooking the risks around Nichushkin. I just don't see any need to bring in a star attraction right away. That kind of thinking is what led this franchise astray. You know what the best kind of identity is? Winning. And it will take a lot of time and patience to build a real winner in this city. No rush.
CliffFletcher is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CliffFletcher For This Useful Post:
Old 04-10-2013, 06:44 PM   #1077
Rubicant
First Line Centre
 
Rubicant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Peterborough, ON
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
I think that MacKinnon is the better prospect (just my opinion). And if all else is equal, then I would take the Canadian.

However, I could care less about marketing - that will take care of itself.

And I could care less about next year, it is pretty much a right-off already. Which is fine as the Flames need several core prospects and it will take more than one draft to get them.

I have never understood the 'he can play next year' argument. Who cares? I want the best player career-wise. I want the highest upside. I want someone who can help win a cup or 6.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinordi View Post
Why should you care how marketable a player is? None of your arguments are based on the hockey he plays or on the contribution the player will have to the long-term success of the team. Ultimately, I could care less how marketable, Canadian or captain material a player is. I want to draft the best player. There are totally legit arguments that Mack is a better player than Nich. You seem to be, again, putting the short-term interests of the fans against the long-term prospects of the team because YOU want a player that you can cheer for next year instead of potentially a better player that wont play next year.


www.youtube.com/watch?v=om7O0MFkmpw


Rubicant is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Rubicant For This Useful Post:
Old 04-10-2013, 07:10 PM   #1078
Hockey_Ninja
 
Hockey_Ninja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH (Grew up in Calgary)
Exp:
Default

I honestly don't see how Nichushkin would fit with us. I realize his upside and talent and the scouts giving him high praise but we need centers, right wings and defensemen more than we need another left winger. If Nichushkin is picked by us if Mackinnon, Bakrov or Lindholm are still on the board i will be very pissed.
__________________
Just trying to do my best
Hockey_Ninja is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Hockey_Ninja For This Useful Post:
Old 04-10-2013, 08:31 PM   #1079
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

The hype surrounding Nichushkin reminds me of the hype that was built up around another big Russian, Alexandr Svitov. There's way too much risk with this kid. Take players that have potential to play throughout the lineup if they don't completely develop. McKinnon, Barkov, and Gauthier jump out at me as guys that will play in the NHL in some capacity, and all have potential to be top end talents. They also don't come as a natural flight risk. The Flames need guys that have potential to be stars, but also are guaranteed of staying in North America and not bolting to the KHL at the drop of a hat.
Lanny_McDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2013, 08:41 PM   #1080
Stormchaser
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Stormchaser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: At a garage sale
Exp:
Default

Article from NHL.com. Didn't see it here yet and pretty cool comments from some of the top prospects.

http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=664342

Quote:
So long before Seth Jones of the Portland Winterhawks, Nathan MacKinnon and Jonathan Drouin of the Halifax Mooseheads, Sean Monahan of the Ottawa 67's and Hunter Shinkaruk of the Medicine Hat Tigers begin a new season, they've already completed their "Central Scouting Questionnaire."
Stormchaser is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Stormchaser For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:29 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy