|
The Following User Says Thank You to PepsiFree For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-24-2025, 11:46 AM
|
#10502
|
|
Scoring Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree
Dach makes sense if Montreal are basically paying us to take him, otherwise the expectations are way too high. He’s a “center” I guess, but he’s also terrible defensively and terrible at faceoffs, gets a wild amount of offensive zone starts because of that (not because he’s good offensively). People get fooled whenever he has a good handful of games in a row but he promptly goes back to being terrible and ends or injured for 30% or more of the season anyway.
He’s purely a camp dump. Negative value.
|
Yeah , the injury part does cut against acquiring him to fill a void. Filling a void with a void leaves ……. a void.
I guess the rubbish comment stands.
|
|
|
10-24-2025, 11:49 AM
|
#10503
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
|
Honestly, there are plenty of other teams that could pursue Kadri if Montreal is not going to want to pay up. I want Hage. He and Reschny down the middle is exactly what we need.
Kadri + Andersson (50%) for Hage, 2026/2027 1st (top 3 protected), Anderson, Matheson
Flames can flip Matheson or extend him. Have a Matheson - Weegar and Bahl - Parekh pairing.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to ForeverFlameFan For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-24-2025, 11:56 AM
|
#10504
|
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Royle9
I dont think we want Dach.
He's never played a full season due to injury.
He's not progressed in the slightest since being traded to MTL.
38pt career high.
He had some luxury to him previously, he's young yes but far too many injuries in such a short career.
I don't see him coming in and becoming a #1 center in CGY.
|
Agreed but I would say he wouldn’t be coming here to be a 1C. He’s got this year at $3.3. Seems like a salary dump from the perspective of the habs. If he comes with a sweetener (a 1st), I’d be for it.
|
|
|
10-24-2025, 11:59 AM
|
#10505
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by traptor
Kind of strange. Not the assessment I would have made for them.
They have Parayko, Fowler, Mailloux and Jiricek. I guess Parayko and Fowler are starting to get up there, Mailloux is still unproven and Jiricek has a ways to develop yet.
I wouldn't of pegged it as a huge position of need though.
|
Don't know what side Fowler played in Anaheim, but Monty doesn't play him on the right side. He's been going with Parayko, Faulk and Mailloux.
Mailloux has been horrendous and a healthy scratch twice. Jiricek didn't have a good camp. Neither are ready. Their only depth option on the right is Matthew Kessel.
|
|
|
10-24-2025, 12:00 PM
|
#10506
|
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
Di Marco says Tom Willander could be a piece coming back if the Flames trade Kadri to the Canucks.
https://www.dailyfaceoff.com/news/wi...on-this-season
Quote:
One of the sources I spoke with suggested 20-year-old defenseman Tom Willander – the Canucks drafted him 11th overall in 2023 – as a piece Calgary would presumably be interested in as part of a package for Kadri. I reported last week that the Flames are in the market for a (preferably young) left-shot defenseman, and touching base with a Flames source, a package centered around Willander for Kadri is a deal that would “make sense,” even though the former is right shooting.
Willander would be a nice addition to the Flames’ defensive future, which is currently highlighted by 2024 first-round pick Zayne Parekh. Parekh, 19, is the crown jewel on Calgary’s defense who has played in six games this season with no points to show for it. According to one league source, Parekh is viewed as a top power play quarterback who can play big minutes but shouldn’t be relied on for the penalty kill and defending leads late in games with heavy defensive-zone situations. Though both right-shooting, Parekh and Willander could make for a nice duo for the Flames in the long term
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-24-2025, 12:04 PM
|
#10507
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan
Honestly, there are plenty of other teams that could pursue Kadri if Montreal is not going to want to pay up. I want Hage. He and Reschny down the middle is exactly what we need.
Kadri + Andersson (50%) for Hage, 2026/2027 1st (top 3 protected), Anderson, Matheson
Flames can flip Matheson or extend him. Have a Matheson - Weegar and Bahl - Parekh pairing.
|
Seems like a lot of value for the Flames. Andersen is a pending UFA and could be flipped for a pick. Matheson is a top 4 D as well so they are giving up a pick and their top prospect to get Kadri and Andersson? Seems like a value gap the Flames would have to close.
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Vinny01 For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-24-2025, 12:04 PM
|
#10508
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Willander is another right shot D-prospect. Flames will corner the market on them
|
|
|
10-24-2025, 12:05 PM
|
#10509
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
|
I thought I read somewhere the Canucks are not willing to move their 26 1st. Getting Wallinder and their 27 1st would be great though
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Vinny01 For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-24-2025, 12:08 PM
|
#10510
|
|
Franchise Player
|
I think if you can get any Canucks future picks, you have to jump on that because they look like a disaster
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Geeoff For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-24-2025, 12:16 PM
|
#10511
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Van Island
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01
I thought I read somewhere the Canucks are not willing to move their 26 1st. Getting Wallinder and their 27 1st would be great though
|
There will be a ton of teams wanting Kadri. I'd say the most desirable player on the market right now. Should be able to get a HUGE return.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to MrMike For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-24-2025, 12:18 PM
|
#10512
|
|
#1 Goaltender
|
If Willander is the target from Vancouver and the Flames shop Kadri around, then the return could be great. Maybe he's not a perfect fit given the flames RD prospect depth, but that quality of asset is great
|
|
|
10-24-2025, 12:24 PM
|
#10513
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Calgary
|
We want Brayden Cootes!
|
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Sandman For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-24-2025, 12:28 PM
|
#10514
|
|
Scoring Winger
|
I would do Kadri for Willander straight across (as opposed to 1st Round Pick + Lesser Piece which has been the structure for the Lindholm/Hanifin/Markstrom deals).
|
|
|
10-24-2025, 12:48 PM
|
#10515
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01
Seems like a lot of value for the Flames. Andersen is a pending UFA and could be flipped for a pick. Matheson is a top 4 D as well so they are giving up a pick and their top prospect to get Kadri and Andersson? Seems like a value gap the Flames would have to close.
|
Anderson is not a pending UFA. He is 5.5m for an extra year after this season. We are taking him on so we don't have to retain on Kadri.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to ForeverFlameFan For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-24-2025, 01:04 PM
|
#10516
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina
Wellity wellity wellity.
That's an interesting team that hasn't been talked about before, but have a lot of prospects that would be interesting. Not sure which of these guys would be on the table but Dvorsky, Carbonneau, Stennberg, Jiricek, Lindstein would all be VERY enticing.
I would also be happy with a 2027 1st as the Blues are a team that could take a sudden and surprising step back.
|
Local pundits and fans seem to be getting impatient with Dvorsky. Of course, that doesn't mean Army is interested in selling
|
|
|
10-24-2025, 01:12 PM
|
#10517
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree
Dach makes sense if Montreal are basically paying us to take him, otherwise the expectations are way too high. He’s a “center” I guess, but he’s also terrible defensively and terrible at faceoffs, gets a wild amount of offensive zone starts because of that (not because he’s good offensively). People get fooled whenever he has a good handful of games in a row but he promptly goes back to being terrible and ends or injured for 30% or more of the season anyway.
He’s purely a camp dump. Negative value.
|
We'll take Dach along with a 1st for future considerations.
Any deal with MTL requires an over pay on their part. At least I hope so.
|
|
|
10-24-2025, 02:03 PM
|
#10518
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Monahan and Sillinger are off to a bit of a slow start for Columbus. Both have 1A, in 6GP.
Similar to Frost, Sillinger just strikes me as a future Flame. I wonder if there's a deal to be had there.
|
|
|
10-24-2025, 02:06 PM
|
#10519
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Richmond upon Thames, London
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geeoff
I think if you can get any Canucks future picks, you have to jump on that because they look like a disaster
|
Agreed.
I love it when the Canucks go all in on their current season despite not being anywhere near the cusp of contention. The threat of Hughes leaving means they kind of have to too.
Canucks are their own amusing trainwreck.
Pay up, squirrel man!
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to TrentCrimmIndependent For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-24-2025, 02:11 PM
|
#10520
|
|
Backup Goalie
Join Date: Apr 2019
Exp:  
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gvitaly
Monahan and Sillinger are off to a bit of a slow start for Columbus. Both have 1A, in 6GP.
Similar to Frost, Sillinger just strikes me as a future Flame. I wonder if there's a deal to be had there.
|
No thank you
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:44 AM.
|
|