Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Event Forums > Olympics
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-27-2010, 07:00 PM   #81
Kjesse
Retired
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Exp:
Default

I don't use sports books often, but for this game I am. Bodog (a site I don't like but I have money there so I'm using it) is currently offering even odds for Canada to win and -110 for the US to win. Taking Canada at even odds is a good bet, so I put everything in that account on Canada to win.

What is interesting is that this means the people who use that site have collectively decided the US has the advantage to win. When you look at how and why Canada lost the first game, an even bet for Canada looks pretty good. And I don't think the US's result against Finland proves anything. (At the same time the late Slovak push yesterday still gives me jitters.)

Last edited by Kjesse; 02-27-2010 at 07:07 PM.
Kjesse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2010, 07:02 PM   #82
GirlySports
NOT breaking news
 
GirlySports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Delgar View Post
I don't use sports books often, but for this game I am. Bodog (a site I don't like but I have money there so I'm using it) is currently offering even odds for Canada to win and -110 for the US to win. Taking Canada at even odds is a good bet, so I put everything in that account on Canada to win.

What is interesting is that this means the people who use that site have collectively decided the US has the advantage to win. When you look at how and why Canada lost the first game, an even bet looks pretty good. And I don't think the US's result against Finland proves anything.
I think you're reading that wrong. Canada is a HUGE favorite.

Canada -1(EVEN)
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire

GirlySports is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2010, 07:09 PM   #83
Kjesse
Retired
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Exp:
Default

That shows you how much I use sports books... thanks. Now a bet on the US is -120 though.

Last edited by Kjesse; 02-27-2010 at 07:16 PM.
Kjesse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2010, 10:35 PM   #84
Mathgod
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

I just hope there isn't an american dollar bill buried beneath center ice...
__________________
Mathgod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2010, 10:39 PM   #85
chalms04
First Line Centre
 
chalms04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathgod View Post
I just hope there isn't an american dollar bill buried beneath center ice...
or a Sacajawea
chalms04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2010, 11:18 PM   #86
Ren
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Exp:
Default

I would like to see an 8-7 win for Canada or something. Just so America loses and we can say we won in spite of Luuuuu.
Ren is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2010, 11:23 PM   #87
d_phaneuf
Franchise Player
 
d_phaneuf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Delgar View Post
I don't use sports books often, but for this game I am. Bodog (a site I don't like but I have money there so I'm using it) is currently offering even odds for Canada to win and -110 for the US to win. Taking Canada at even odds is a good bet, so I put everything in that account on Canada to win.

What is interesting is that this means the people who use that site have collectively decided the US has the advantage to win. When you look at how and why Canada lost the first game, an even bet for Canada looks pretty good. And I don't think the US's result against Finland proves anything. (At the same time the late Slovak push yesterday still gives me jitters.)
Canada is -1 at Bodog -105

that means if they win by 1 its a push

and its the generally accepted line, it has nothing about how much people have bet. Its what they set the line at to get people on both sides.

For example at Pinnacle Canada -1 is +106

Canada to win the gold medal is -200, to win in regulation is -127
d_phaneuf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2010, 11:45 PM   #88
pepper24
Franchise Player
 
pepper24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

I don't see the Canadians losing twice to the Americans. Miller outplays Luongo but the Canadians still win 5-3. Canada is just too good.

Getzlaf, Crosby, Iginla, Weber, Doughty.
Kane, Parise (2)

Go Canada!
pepper24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2010, 11:49 PM   #89
Kidder
Franchise Player
 
Kidder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: nexus of the universe
Exp:
Default

This game is setting up to be an absolute classic.

The storyline couldn't be scripted any better. Now add in that a Canadian victory gives us the record for most Golds by ANY country at the Winter Olympic games, on home soil no less.

To borrow the words from a legendary broadcaster, this will be a Ring-A-Ding-Dong-Dandy!!!

GO CANADA GO!!!
__________________
Would there even be no trade clauses if Edmonton was out of the NHL? - fotze
Kidder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2010, 11:51 PM   #90
RyZ
First Line Centre
 
RyZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

If Canada brings the 'A' game then it really doesn't matter what the USA does. If the goaltending duel isn't as lopsided as last game, I can't see the American skaters out playing the Canadian skaters for a big win. Especially if Miller and Luongo play at a similar level.
RyZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2010, 11:56 PM   #91
GirlySports
NOT breaking news
 
GirlySports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Yeah bascially Canada -1 is the even line. Which is fair. Last Sunday it was -1.5.

Bet at your peril.
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire

GirlySports is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2010, 12:03 AM   #92
twisted
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Exp:
Default

well I am sitting here thinking about tomorrow game and my heart is beating hard; Feeling the pressure... I don't know how those guys are feeling now....
twisted is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2010, 12:09 AM   #93
minnow
#1 Goaltender
 
minnow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Erie
Exp:
Default

This series has been so melodramatic...now I'm hearing that Iggy is back down to the third line with Towes and Morrow, to take on the US top line of Parise, Langenbrunner and Stastny. Crosby is the weak link on the first line, so they move everyone around to try to get him going? It's kind of late for that. Iggy is scoring (or setting up scorers) so they move him to a shut down position? The US is using their scorers to score and their grinders to grind. That makes more sense to me. I think Crosby has screwed up this whole team. I really, really hope he proves me wrong tomorrow.
minnow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2010, 12:10 AM   #94
flylock shox
1 millionth post winnar!
 
flylock shox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Now world wide!
Exp:
Default

Canada wins 5-4 in a shootout. Kane is smushed beyond recognition.


God I'm going to miss the Olympics. They made Vancouver so much more fun. Here's hoping it ends on a really high note.
flylock shox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2010, 12:17 AM   #95
jeremywilhelm
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Americas hat
Exp:
Default

I have no problem with Iginla back with Toews and Morrow. If Iginla plays smashmouth hockey he is gonna create some room for those two and they will create room for him. Toews is such a fantastic player. He is outplaying Crosby by a mile this tournie (this is coming from a HUGE Crosby fan).

Who cares who plays where as long as Canada wins!
jeremywilhelm is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jeremywilhelm For This Useful Post:
Old 02-28-2010, 12:19 AM   #96
arloiginla
#1 Goaltender
 
arloiginla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I have to go back on my original prediction of a close game or shootout loss.

Watching the Finland-Slovakia game has further affirmed to me that momentum doesn't exist in this tournament.

Slovakia should have had everything going for them as far as Big Mo goes but they didn't score first, and didn't close out what should have been an airtight 3-1 lead after two on an offensively challenged team.

U.S. momentum coming into this means nothing. They might have the better first 10 minutes of the game but unless they score another six goals in those 10 minutes it won't matter.

Canada takes it fairly convincingly by at least two goals. They are better at every position except goal and if they score an early one on Miller I think he will be out of their heads and a non-factor.
arloiginla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2010, 12:58 AM   #97
bc-chris
Franchise Player
 
bc-chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Kelowna, BC
Exp:
Default


4 -3 canada….

usa gets 3 quick goals, Canada pulls luongo, iggy gets 4 goals.


the results...
Canada wins, iggy's a hero, luongo is still a luuuuuuser (not to mention we won't have to endure endless luuuuuu chants everytime the puck misses the net!)

GO IGGY GO!!!!!

__________________
"...and there goes Finger up the middle on Luongo!" - Jim Hughson, Av's vs. 'Nucks
bc-chris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2010, 01:00 AM   #98
minnow
#1 Goaltender
 
minnow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Erie
Exp:
Default

Call me a homer, but Slovakia got an easy ride from the ref when they played Canada. Canada won because they are by far the better team regardless of the American ref. The Fins beat them because all those penalties (or enough of them) were called in the game today.
minnow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2010, 01:02 AM   #99
HOOT
Franchise Player
 
HOOT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: @HOOT250
Exp:
Default

Leaving in 5 hours to Vancouver. I have decided not to sleep and just continue to drink and get stoned. I've decided internet poker will keep me occupied until then.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by henriksedin33 View Post
Not at all, as I've said, I would rather start with LA over any of the other WC playoff teams. Bunch of underachievers who look good on paper but don't even deserve to be in the playoffs.
HOOT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2010, 01:42 AM   #100
silentsim
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SW calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeremywilhelm View Post
I have no problem with Iginla back with Toews and Morrow. If Iginla plays smashmouth hockey he is gonna create some room for those two and they will create room for him. Toews is such a fantastic player. He is outplaying Crosby by a mile this tournie (this is coming from a HUGE Crosby fan).

Who cares who plays where as long as Canada wins!
It would be stupid to break up Morrow Getzlaf Perry.

That line has been the best of Canada's since formed.
silentsim is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:49 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy