| 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-08-2006, 07:01 PM | #81 |  
	| #1 Springs1 Fan 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: -      | 
 
			
			I just really enjoyed Canada's attitude in this all. I mean Whitt comes out to the mound with the bases loaded in the first huge smile on his face cracks a joke gives the guy a pat on the back he gets them to ground into a DP. Team worked so hard for this W they really deserve it.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-08-2006, 07:08 PM | #82 |  
	| Draft Pick 
				 
				Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Go Flames!      | 
 
			
			For anyone wanting a canada wallpaper, i couldn't find any, so i made this one:  
				__________________   |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-08-2006, 07:11 PM | #83 |  
	| Appealing my suspension 
				 
				Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Just outside Enemy Lines      | 
 
			
			Wow huge turn around for Canada with a big win.  After struggling against unknown South African pitchers at times they come out and hit the known stars like the D-train and the like.  This is like Switzerland beating Canada at the Olympics in hockey.  Hopefully they can pull out another win against the Mexicans.  Would really suck to beat the US, but not advance due to run differential.  LIGHT UP LOAIZA!!!!
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-08-2006, 07:49 PM | #84 |  
	| Lifetime Suspension | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by troutman
					
				 This ranks up there for me with CAN winning the Gold Cup in CONCACAF soccer. |  
Ya that was amazing especially the win against mexico where hastings roofed that ball for the win.  My favourite Canada soccer moment.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-08-2006, 08:17 PM | #85 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: not lurking      | 
				  
 
			
			Assuming Mexico wins tonight and the US wins tomorrow, the tie-breaking situation isn't very good for Canada:
 USA: 8 runs against in games amongst tied teams
 Mexico: 2 runs against + Canada's runs tomorrow
 Canada: 6 runs against + Mexico's runs tomorrow
 
 This means that if Canada loses tomorrow, they have to hold Mexico to 2 runs or less to advance. If they were to lose 1-0 tomorrow, the US would be eliminated and Canada and Mexico would advance. It's strange how the second tiebreaker (after runs allowed average) is earned runs allowed. So if Canada loses 2-0 or 2-1, but one of those runs is unearned, we advance. If we allow exactly two earned runs, it goes to the next tie-breaker, batting average. The US has 15 hits in the Canada and Mexico games, so to win the third tiebreaker, Canada would need just three hits. At least, that's what I make from the weird tie-breaking system they're using. Hopefully Mexico will lose tonight and tomorrow's game will simply determine whether Canada finishes first or second in the pool.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-08-2006, 08:50 PM | #86 |  
	| Draft Pick 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Norman, OK      | 
				  
 
			
			Thanks for the explanation on the tiebreaker, octothorp. Seems strange that earned runs are a category, let alone the prime category (I would have thought run differential). Could this not lead to some fishy stuff, though? Say  the US is up huge tomorrow but realize they can't give up any earned runs...South Africa has a guy on 3rd with no one out. Clemens delivers to Varitek and...oops, silly Varitek, he let that one get by! Passed ball and an unearned run, wasting only a ball to the current hitter. This isn't the best example, but would be the ideal if you could actually pull it off subtly. 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by octothorp
					
				 Hopefully Mexico will lose tonight and tomorrow's game will simply determine whether Canada finishes first or second in the pool. |  
I wholeheartedly agree, for both your sake and the Americans. Holy god that would be awful, to see them eliminated.
 
Also, congrats are in order to you guys for today's game. After JV hit that granny, I thought the US would storm back and take it, but that Adam Stern can play some center. Unlucky on the ball bouncing out of his glove towards the end, but luckily for the Canadians, nothing came of it.
		
				__________________You said you didn't give a fata about hockey,
 and I never saw someone say that before.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-08-2006, 09:23 PM | #87 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: May 2002 Location: Virginia      | 
 
			
			Varitek's HR was absolutely devastating to Canada's chances.  
 Without that homer, all we'd have to do is hold Mexico to 5 or less runs, now we pretty much have to beat them, and they've saved one of their best pitchers for us.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-08-2006, 09:29 PM | #88 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: not lurking      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by JLHagg
					
				 Could this not lead to some fishy stuff, though? Say  the US is up huge tomorrow but realize they can't give up any earned runs...South Africa has a guy on 3rd with no one out. Clemens delivers to Varitek and...oops, silly Varitek, he let that one get by! Passed ball and an unearned run, wasting only a ball to the current hitter. This isn't the best example, but would be the ideal if you could actually pull it off subtly. |  
Hmmm, interesting point. Tomorrow's game against SA doesn't have any relevance, as the tie-breaker will only use stats from the Mexico/Canada/US head-to-head games. But theoretically, a situation could come up where that would be in a team's best interests.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-09-2006, 12:57 AM | #89 |  
	| #1 Springs1 Fan 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: -      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by nfotiu
					
				 Varitek's HR was absolutely devastating to Canada's chances. 
 Without that homer, all we'd have to do is hold Mexico to 5 or less runs, now we pretty much have to beat them, and they've saved one of their best pitchers for us.
 |  
I don't wanna sound like a huge homer here but a win of this magnitude just overshadow's that competley. Loiza doesen't scare me that much especilly for a team that just went through Willis
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-09-2006, 08:16 AM | #90 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: May 2002 Location: Virginia      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by octothorp
					
				 Hmmm, interesting point. Tomorrow's game against SA doesn't have any relevance, as the tie-breaker will only use stats from the Mexico/Canada/US head-to-head games. But theoretically, a situation could come up where that would be in a team's best interests. |  
Canada and Mexico should just get together and agree to let Mexico win 1-0.  It is best for both countries, as they each make the next round, and neither has to worry about the Americans.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-09-2006, 06:45 PM | #91 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: not lurking      | 
 
			
			Not a good start tonight: 6-0 Mexico in the second.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-09-2006, 08:38 PM | #92 |  
	| Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Crowsnest Pass      | 
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-09-2006, 10:03 PM | #93 |  
	| Lifetime Suspension | 
 
			
			Brutal tiebreak method - looks like Canada is out even after going 2-1.  That is a very arbitrary way to knock a team out.  Make it runs for instead of runs against and the US is going home instead.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-09-2006, 10:27 PM | #94 |  
	| In the Sin Bin | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Footscray
					
				 Brutal tiebreak method - looks like Canada is out even after going 2-1.  That is a very arbitrary way to knock a team out.  Make it runs for instead of runs against and the US is going home instead. |  
That is just as arbitrary as the system we have now, except that it benifits us.
 
I would argue run differential would be the best solution, just like international hockey, and unfortunately, that would put us out as well.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-10-2006, 01:00 AM | #95 |  
	| #1 Goaltender 
				 
				Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Richmond, BC      | 
 
			
			Disappointing for sure, but definitely not a total disappointment on the whole.
 Canada is only getting better at baseball.
 
				__________________"For thousands of years humans were oppressed - as some of us still are - by the notion that the universe is a marionette whose strings are pulled by a god or gods, unseen and inscrutable." - Carl Sagan
 Freedom consonant with responsibility.
 
 
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-10-2006, 02:22 AM | #96 |  
	| Lifetime Suspension | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Snakeeye
					
				 That is just as arbitrary as the system we have now, except that it benifits us.
 I would argue run differential would be the best solution, just like international hockey, and unfortunately, that would put us out as well.
 |  
Don't get me wrong, I'm not arguing in favor of one system over another, you can find a tiebreak method using numbers that will put any of the three teams outm they're all crappy.  One team beating another is the only fair way, though i know time constraints come into play here preventing tiebreakers.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-16-2006, 06:30 PM | #97 |  
	| #1 Goaltender 
				 
				Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Richmond, BC      | 
 
			
			Anybody see the MEX/USA game?
 Mexican puts it off the foul pole, about 15 feet up, umpire calls it a ground rule double.
 
 Might be the worst call I have ever seen, as a viewer, player or umpire.
 
				__________________"For thousands of years humans were oppressed - as some of us still are - by the notion that the universe is a marionette whose strings are pulled by a god or gods, unseen and inscrutable." - Carl Sagan
 Freedom consonant with responsibility.
 
 
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-16-2006, 08:31 PM | #98 |  
	| Lifetime Suspension | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by evman150
					
				 Anybody see the MEX/USA game?
 Mexican puts it off the foul pole, about 15 feet up, umpire calls it a ground rule double.
 
 Might be the worst call I have ever seen, as a viewer, player or umpire.
 |  
karma for the US's lucky call against Japan?
  
either way, mexico just won 2-1.  Good to see all these upsets.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-16-2006, 10:38 PM | #99 |  
	| In the Sin Bin | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by evman150
					
				 Anybody see the MEX/USA game?
 Mexican puts it off the foul pole, about 15 feet up, umpire calls it a ground rule double.
 
 Might be the worst call I have ever seen, as a viewer, player or umpire.
 |  
Oh, there've been worse.
 
The kid in New York that interfered with a ball in play, in the playoffs, and the umps ruled it a home run, or instance.
 
Still, a brutal call, but I can't say I am disapointed with it.  As the sister says, it makes up for the bad call the Americans got to help them beat Japan - and it was the same ump in both cases.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-17-2006, 08:36 AM | #100 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: sector 7G      | 
 
			
			so now we know why the guy isn't in the big leagues anymore. Nice to see the favourites lose. I'm cheering for Cuba. how funny would a Korea/Cuba final be?
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is Off 
 |  |  |  All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:22 AM. | 
 
 
 |