[GT] Flames at Leafs....

[Aegypticus]

That no goal from the Leafs reminds me of how BS it is that you can high stick someone in the process of playing the puck or on a follow through. High sticking is a penalty because it’s a dangerous play, right? I reject the idea that we should allow a dangerous play to stand because it’s the consequence of a hockey play. Aren’t we trying to get rid of those kinds of things?

[Calgary]

This one is coming back.

[Bonded]

lol knew the Leafs were going to challenge that

[Scrambler]

I had a feeling the Laffs would try this when I saw it live

[WhiteTiger]

Hm...I dunno about that one. That might come back

[GioforPM]

LOL this would be funny if it goes the same as last game on this challenge

[CedarMeter]

Meh. Probably coming back.

[TrentCrimmIndependent]

Stung by the 'Bee?

[Cecil Terwilliger]

You get a goal called back and you get a goal called back. Everyone gets a goal called back.

[Jiggy_12]

Woll made zero effort to get back.

[PugnaciousIntern]

Probably coming back

[GioforPM]

That’s pretty minimal contact

[Bonded]

That’s probably coming back after yesterday and Vladar

[3rd liner]

No way that’s interference . Though after the one that went the flames way the other day who knows.

[Phaneuf_Phan]

Good goal, it's a battle for the puck.

[TheIronMaiden]

1-1

[Cycling76er]

Unsure how that prevents Woll from resetting to make a save when the puck as behind them...but Leafs.

[WhiteTiger]

Eh. Why even bother celebrating goals anymore.

[MonaTone]

No way that can be called back

[dammage79]

Poor Farabee.