Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-02-2025, 11:36 AM   #81
Locke
Franchise Player
 
Locke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heavy Jack View Post
So many that it’s still topically funny all these years later; it’s always irked me that posts have never been a kept stat by the NHL.
Hahaha!! I even remember he'd ding the bar and his teammates on the bench just looked like....

"Oh God...Not again...he's going to come over here now and he's going to be in a foul mood all night!"

Ah the life of a Flames fan. All these wonderful events we get to remember and hold dear...most of them are tragic.
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!

This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.

The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans

If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
Locke is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Locke For This Useful Post:
Old 02-02-2025, 11:49 AM   #82
Fire
Franchise Player
 
Fire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Seems like a perfect time to give Kuznetsov or Solovyov a chance. Can't be much worse than Barrie or Miromanov.
__________________

Fire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2025, 12:04 PM   #83
FlatLandFlamesFan
Scoring Winger
 
FlatLandFlamesFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: On the Bandwagon
Exp:
Default

Amonte the goal scorer who couldn't so many nearly retired stars on those teams
FlatLandFlamesFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2025, 12:19 PM   #84
butterfly
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
I am curious, when you post these stats, do you ever ask yourself if they align with what you see on the ice?

Do you think Weegar is a top 10 D in the league? Do you think Pettersson is a top 20 D in the league?
It's a pretty good model given the data we have. If you have suggestions on improving it I'd like to hear them.

Not anecdotes about what you saw on the ice, because you're probably overrating or underrating play that leads to goal prevention or creation. Any given GIVE_d could be overskating the puck in the corner with 3 defenders in front of the net, or an outright bad play like what Weegar did in the Washington game.

Who do you think are the top 20 D in the league and what are you basing it on? I have time to watch a decent number of Flames games but I am not watching every team play every game.
butterfly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2025, 01:23 PM   #85
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by butterfly View Post
It's a pretty good model given the data we have. If you have suggestions on improving it I'd like to hear them.

Not anecdotes about what you saw on the ice, because you're probably overrating or underrating play that leads to goal prevention or creation. Any given GIVE_d could be overskating the puck in the corner with 3 defenders in front of the net, or an outright bad play like what Weegar did in the Washington game.

Who do you think are the top 20 D in the league and what are you basing it on? I have time to watch a decent number of Flames games but I am not watching every team play every game.
Is it? If it isn't accurately reflecting what it is attempting to measure, then it isn't a good model.

Not attacking you, just saying hockey stats still have a long way to go. And the argument 'they're the best we have" doesn't hold water if they aren't accurate and meaningful.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2025, 02:12 PM   #86
Fighting Banana Slug
#1 Goaltender
 
Fighting Banana Slug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Who are the top 10 D (or 20) according to that model?
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
Fighting Banana Slug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2025, 02:28 PM   #87
butterfly
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fighting Banana Slug View Post
Who are the top 10 D (or 20) according to that model?
Remember that it's backward looking, only for this season, and not a projection.

Hughes, Chabot, Harley, Sandin, Tanev, Mikkola, Lindell, Samberg, Weegar, Makar, Hamilton, Bouchard, McCabe, Kovacevic, Siegenthaler, Pettersson, Byram, Karlsson, Raddysh, Guhle
butterfly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2025, 02:39 PM   #88
butterfly
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
Is it? If it isn't accurately reflecting what it is attempting to measure, then it isn't a good model.

Not attacking you, just saying hockey stats still have a long way to go. And the argument 'they're the best we have" doesn't hold water if they aren't accurate and meaningful.
I think so. I linked to the rationale in the analysis thread. It's not perfect as I would prefer a positional adjustment rewarding centers and punishing wingers because of the difficulty required to play each position. I also think that I agree for the need to treat various game states differently, which is unique to hockey, but the results should be normalized to yield a (near) constant number of wins every season.

If "they're the best we have" doesn't hold water, then neither does anyone's eye test. You'd have to give a rationale explaining empirically why you believe so, which is next to impossible given that almost no one has time to watch every game.

Last edited by butterfly; 02-02-2025 at 02:49 PM.
butterfly is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:24 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy