Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-13-2020, 11:09 PM   #81
Samonadreau
Franchise Player
 
Samonadreau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Paradise
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nelson View Post
Gio and Tkachuk do have lots of GAF. But I actually feel like Treliving has prioritized GAF in his drafting. Andersson, Mangiapane, Dube, Valimaki, Phillips, and Pelletier all come to mind as ppl with lots of GAF.
Rittich too. Not a draft pick but close to it in hand picking him from Europe.
Samonadreau is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Samonadreau For This Useful Post:
Old 07-13-2020, 11:38 PM   #82
Itse
Franchise Player
 
Itse's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Exp:
Default

Probably worth reminding that a large portion of positive test results are false positives.

(Simple math reason; most people tested don't have covid. A small percentage of false positives from a very large pool of non-infected is often > true positives from the small group of infected.)

So a player testing positive once doesn't necessarily mean they actually have covid, but they'll still have to be isolated just to be sure.
Itse is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Itse For This Useful Post:
Old 07-14-2020, 09:24 AM   #83
tvp2003
Franchise Player
 
tvp2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Itse View Post
Probably worth reminding that a large portion of positive test results are false positives.

(Simple math reason; most people tested don't have covid. A small percentage of false positives from a very large pool of non-infected is often > true positives from the small group of infected.)

So a player testing positive once doesn't necessarily mean they actually have covid, but they'll still have to be isolated just to be sure.
Interesting that you mentioned this -- this is an excerpt from an article from the Athletic (about Auston Matthews getting COVID):

Quote:
On the weekend, our Arpon Basu learned that three Montreal Canadiens players had tested positive for COVID-19. Less than 24 hours later, however, it was revealed that two of those cases were deemed to be false positives.
tvp2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2020, 12:41 PM   #84
tsquared1967
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Itse View Post
Probably worth reminding that a large portion of positive test results are false positives.

(Simple math reason; most people tested don't have covid. A small percentage of false positives from a very large pool of non-infected is often > true positives from the small group of infected.)

So a player testing positive once doesn't necessarily mean they actually have covid, but they'll still have to be isolated just to be sure.
From what I have been reading is false negatives are about 20% and false positive is about 5%. If you test too early, the false negatives increases and this is why testing after you show symptoms is more accurate.
tsquared1967 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:35 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy