[GT] Flames vs Senators

[Mass_nerder]

I hate when other team poke the puck in out of our goalies' gloves, but I've never seen it called back.
I obviously want us to be up 2 goals, but I also wish the NHL would stop viewing that as a legitimate play.

[Shazam]

Ref could say that he meant to blow the whistle.

[SebC]

Should not be a goal, but don't know if it can be overturned.

[funnymunk]

Seeing how positive the announcers are being... it's not going to count

[bigrangy]

I think it should be no goal

[burn_this_city]

This should be interesting

[Maritime Q-Scout]

Sportsnet needs to slow this down.

Was his glove completely on the ice with the puck covered? Did his stick get under the glove?

I'm leaning toward no goal.

[CalgaryFan1988]

Bad call.

[Cecil Terwilliger]

Horse####.

[Gaudfather]

Garbage call!

[GioforPM]

If Crosby can knock it put of Smith's glove that should count.

But it didn't.

[JurassicTunga12]

oh f off.

[djsFlames]

But they didn't blow it down....

[WhiteTiger]

Boo

[FusionX]

Interesting to see how this goes... but that's a bang bang play. I'll be surprised either way I think

[Jetfire]

Excuse me?

[LostCatalyst]

I have no idea. I'd be pissed off if that was a goal against the Flames so I'm gonna say it'll get called back

[N-E-B]

I don’t agree with that call at all.

[dsavillian]

Originally Posted by Shazam

Rec could say that he meant to blow the whistle.

If that was the case, I would have expected the goal to be waved off immediately.


Anyone know the rule on making contact with the goaltender's glove when there's an attempt to cover?

[badradio]

The NHL is the worst league in sports