Quote:
Originally Posted by Classic_Sniper
Today he definitely didn’t give him much credit for a solid performance. He’s probably made his decision on what he thinks Smith is. I suppose Pat might be the most neutral of the bunch at this point. Very polarizing topic at this point without a doubt.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
Why do you think you have to make a decision about a goalie and can’t just have an opinion about their game?
To me, you have 3 main factors / groups of factors in the goaltender’s statistical results
- 1. opposing offense performance - not controlled by goalie
- 2. Flames defense performance - not controlled by goalie
- 3. goaltender performance - controlled by goalie
If you rank each one from, say, 1 to 5, then maybe it gives a better picture of what happened.
Mike Smith deserves a pretty good grade on category 3 last game, right? Liked the blocker save on Barkov in OT, thought the attempted / faked poke check was a weird waste of energy on the second shootout attempt. Second goal, a good shot. It was a ‘could have had it’ shot, not a ‘should have had it’ shot.
Florida doesn’t get a high mark from me on Category 1, though. Lots of shots in to the logo. A 1 or a 2 out of 5 for difficulty. Tampa on the other hand would be full marks, 5/5. Their offense was quick, precise, savage. I don’t think Florida had a single shot as dangerous as Tampa’s top 6-8.
A solid job, in a mainly boring and not so challenging game. Good job, but in my opinion, nothing to fawn over.
I find Cassie does this on her broadcasts though. Smith has taken such a beating that everything he does well is celebrated, like when your kid colours inside the lines.
Solid but nothing to write home about for an ordinary goalie. Factor in the fatigue and the low expectations, maybe that’s why such praise.
Humorous as well that I have seen people say the Flames made Reiner look good, but Smith was great.