Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-26-2018, 04:51 PM   #81
CalgaryFan1988
Franchise Player
 
CalgaryFan1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

If the Flames didn't have Hamonic, they wouldn't have finished where they did in the standings. This thread is about as productive as a Jokinen/Brandon Gormley discussion.
CalgaryFan1988 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CalgaryFan1988 For This Useful Post:
Old 04-26-2018, 04:57 PM   #82
Locke
Franchise Player
 
Locke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CalgaryFan1988 View Post
If the Flames didn't have Hamonic, they wouldn't have finished where they did in the standings. This thread is about as productive as a Jokinen/Brandon Gormley discussion.
Bull.

If you'd said: "If the Flames didnt have Gulutzan they wouldnt have finished where they did in the standings'

I'd be more likely to believe that.
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!

This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.

The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans

If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
Locke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2018, 05:00 PM   #83
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CalgaryFan1988 View Post
If the Flames didn't have Hamonic, they wouldn't have finished where they did in the standings. This thread is about as productive as a Jokinen/Brandon Gormley discussion.
What's the spin here? The Flames we're better off in the Standings with Hamonic? That's honestly not saying much. And I think a lot of fans could sleep better knowing that there was an I coming top tiier player if they kept the pick and ran with Andersson let's say.

Either way, this topic is a very dead horse. At least I think k it was a horse, all I see is goo on the floor.
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
Old 04-26-2018, 05:11 PM   #84
CalgaryFan1988
Franchise Player
 
CalgaryFan1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke View Post
Bull.

If you'd said: "If the Flames didnt have Gulutzan they wouldnt have finished where they did in the standings'

I'd be more likely to believe that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
What's the spin here? The Flames we're better off in the Standings with Hamonic? That's honestly not saying much. And I think a lot of fans could sleep better knowing that there was an I coming top tiier player if they kept the pick and ran with Andersson let's say.

Either way, this topic is a very dead horse. At least I think k it was a horse, all I see is goo on the floor.

Not saying the Flames would have finished below or above where they did with or without Hamonic, just saying that the pick isn't where the Flames would have picked regardless. Not sure what "bull" that entails.

These "what if" threads are useless.
CalgaryFan1988 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2018, 06:03 PM   #85
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
What's the spin here? The Flames we're better off in the Standings with Hamonic? That's honestly not saying much. And I think a lot of fans could sleep better knowing that there was an I coming top tiier player if they kept the pick and ran with Andersson let's say.

Either way, this topic is a very dead horse. At least I think k it was a horse, all I see is goo on the floor.
What "top tier" player? There's a 2.5% chance right now of getting the top pick. Who, as a D, might not even play for a few years.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2018, 06:57 PM   #86
PlayfulGenius
Franchise Player
 
PlayfulGenius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Exp:
Default

Worrying whether the pick wins the lottery is ridiculous, as it's extremely unlikely the Flames finish in the exact position had they not made the trade for Hamonic... if the pick turns into a top 3 does NOT mean the Flames would've picked top 3 had they not made the trade.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by LickTheEnvelope View Post
... Eakins' claims Gagne's line played Kessel's line even...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hells Bells View Post
Yeah, Gagner's line was -4 and Kessel's was +4, so it all evened out.
PlayfulGenius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2018, 07:27 PM   #87
Owen15
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

I’m way more concerned that Edmonton or Vancouver land Brady than NYI winning the lottery. That would really suck. Damn I think it’s happening.
Owen15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2018, 07:35 PM   #88
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

I hope the islanders win. It means the Oilers don't.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2018, 07:52 PM   #89
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
What's the spin here? The Flames we're better off in the Standings with Hamonic? That's honestly not saying much. And I think a lot of fans could sleep better knowing that there was an I coming top tiier player if they kept the pick and ran with Andersson let's say.

Either way, this topic is a very dead horse. At least I think k it was a horse, all I see is goo on the floor.
Flames would have been better off in the standings if they kept Engelland and not make the trade for Hamonic.
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2018, 07:55 PM   #90
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
Flames would have been better off in the standings if they kept Engelland and not make the trade for Hamonic.
Who should have they left unprotected in the expansion draft to allow that to happen?
Jiri Hrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2018, 07:58 PM   #91
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
Who should have they left unprotected in the expansion draft to allow that to happen?
He was a UFA and destined to sign with Vegas.
The Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2018, 08:00 PM   #92
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra View Post
He was a UFA and destined to sign with Vegas.
that too
Jiri Hrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2018, 08:06 PM   #93
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PugnaciousIntern View Post
I assume that he didn’t think Stone should be in the Top-4 when he went out and got another top-4 guy without moving anybody else. Of course, those players are fluid and he has played in the top-4 in the past, but BT clearly wanted an upgrade.

I’m not sure Engelland was fed up, as much he just wanted to play for his home town. Understandable, common, and something he’s said himself. If you have any quotes or other insider info, let us know. But who here truly thought that he earned full time in the top-4 during his time here, apart from that run into the playoffs with Gio down. He’s playing well for Vegas no doubt, but playing in the top-4 and having a bonafide top-4 D skill set are two separate issues
and yet Engelland played 18:40 last year in 81 games. 19:03 / game in the post all star games when the Flames were actually good. If he wasn't top 4 he was the heaviest used # 5 in the league.


And somehow Vegas is a better team than any team the Flames have had in the last 14 years playing a guy without top-4 defensive skills in a top-4 role???
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2018, 08:10 PM   #94
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
Who should have they left unprotected in the expansion draft to allow that to happen?
really??? Lazar was protected.
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2018, 08:27 PM   #95
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
and yet Engelland played 18:40 last year in 81 games. 19:03 / game in the post all star games when the Flames were actually good. If he wasn't top 4 he was the heaviest used # 5 in the league.


And somehow Vegas is a better team than any team the Flames have had in the last 14 years playing a guy without top-4 defensive skills in a top-4 role???
Vegas doesn't have a top 4. They run all three defensive pairings almost equally. Nate Schmidt led the team with 22:14 TOI/GP. Six other defencemen exceeded 19 minutes.

The fact is, the Golden Knights are a team without any plugs, because unlike any other expansion team in history, they had access to enough good players to fill the entire roster. They made good use of that unique opportunity, and proved it by finishing 5th out of 31 teams.

Yeah. ‘Somehow’ Vegas is a better team than the Flames. It's a better team than Pittsburgh or Washington, too. And Deryk Engelland has very little to do with that. So knock it off with the daft comparisons.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Jay Random For This Useful Post:
Old 04-26-2018, 08:27 PM   #96
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
really??? Lazar was protected.
Doesn’t matter as they would have either had to leave a dman unprotected (Brodie, Hamilton or Gio) or expose lazar and two other forwards
They could either do 7f 3d or 8 total

So that means
Gio
Hamilton
Brodie
DE
Johnny
Sam
Backlund
Monahan

So that’s 8 leaving Lazar, Ferland, Frolik all exposed. All to protect a pending ufa who seemed on his way to Vegas. That’s nuts.

Last edited by Jiri Hrdina; 04-26-2018 at 08:29 PM.
Jiri Hrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 17 Users Say Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
Old 04-26-2018, 08:29 PM   #97
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
really??? Lazar was protected.
So you wanted the Flames to protect Engelland, even though he had zero intention of re-signing here, and was never going to play another game for the team? Brilliant.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Jay Random For This Useful Post:
Old 04-26-2018, 08:29 PM   #98
Macindoc
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969 View Post
I hope the islanders win. It means the Oilers don't.
100% agree. I'd rather be ridiculed than have the Oilers brag about and then proceed to ruin another #1 overall. And who knows, with another generational player, the Oilers might actually be good (I can't believe I wrote that ).
Macindoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2018, 10:52 AM   #99
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
Doesn’t matter as they would have either had to leave a dman unprotected (Brodie, Hamilton or Gio) or expose lazar and two other forwards
They could either do 7f 3d or 8 total

So that means
Gio
Hamilton
Brodie
DE
Johnny
Sam
Backlund
Monahan

So that’s 8 leaving Lazar, Ferland, Frolik all exposed. All to protect a pending ufa who seemed on his way to Vegas. That’s nuts.
Totally valid point on the expansion draft. I was wrong to think that the Flames should have protected Engelland.... well obviously they couldn't as he was a UFA.

With 20/20 hind sight UFA Backlund / Frolik / Ferland/ Sam and Lazar and Brodie looked a lot better at expansion draft time than they do today.

The point I am trying to make with Engelland was that Hamonic was brought in as a replacement and based on the 2016-17 season Hamonic was not an upgrade. Somehow the Flames management (and fan base) missed this

A common reason for acquiring Hamonic was keeping him away from Edmonton. That is never a good reason....

also he was a "value" contract at 3.85m for another 3 years.

Engelland who was vastly overpaid to provide very similar defense capabilities as well a far more significant physical presence and the "A" in Vegas might indicate leadership was paid 2.9M for his 3 years in Calgary.


All the BS about a mid level first round draft choice not having equivalent value compared to Hamonic how many votes do we have for Hamonic being more important to the Flames than last years #16 pick.
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2018, 01:31 PM   #100
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
Totally valid point on the expansion draft. I was wrong to think that the Flames should have protected Engelland.... well obviously they couldn't as he was a UFA.

With 20/20 hind sight UFA Backlund / Frolik / Ferland/ Sam and Lazar and Brodie looked a lot better at expansion draft time than they do today.

The point I am trying to make with Engelland was that Hamonic was brought in as a replacement and based on the 2016-17 season Hamonic was not an upgrade. Somehow the Flames management (and fan base) missed this

A common reason for acquiring Hamonic was keeping him away from Edmonton. That is never a good reason....

also he was a "value" contract at 3.85m for another 3 years.

Engelland who was vastly overpaid to provide very similar defense capabilities as well a far more significant physical presence and the "A" in Vegas might indicate leadership was paid 2.9M for his 3 years in Calgary.


All the BS about a mid level first round draft choice not having equivalent value compared to Hamonic how many votes do we have for Hamonic being more important to the Flames than last years #16 pick.
BY any measure Hamonic was an upgrade. He still is.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:29 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy