Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-26-2016, 03:26 PM   #81
1qqaaz
Franchise Player
 
1qqaaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Indiana
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buck Murdock View Post
Gostisbehere, Giroux, 1st
Realistically, I think this is reasonable. The first might have to be conditional or something.
1qqaaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2016, 03:32 PM   #82
NuclearFart
First Line Centre
 
NuclearFart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by topfiverecords View Post
Toews, Kane, Keith, and a time machine.
If the hot tub time machine is up and running, we should be asking for Gretzky, Lemieux and Orr .
NuclearFart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2016, 03:48 PM   #83
JiriHrdina
I believe in the Pony Power
 
JiriHrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reign of Fire View Post
How did this thread reach 79 posts? Should've been locked after 1.
Again.
Why did you click on a thread that was of no interest to you
Why then did you take the time to comment on that thread

It is clearly labeled. You have no obligation to say anything or read anything in this thread.

Simply move on to topics that are of interest to you.

So simple that it boggles my mind that people struggle with it.
JiriHrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to JiriHrdina For This Useful Post:
Old 08-26-2016, 03:50 PM   #84
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

This isn't blasphemy people ... it's a question.

And I hope it's a question the Flames ask themselves all the time about players and assets and options.
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
Old 08-26-2016, 03:56 PM   #85
Finger Cookin
Franchise Player
 
Finger Cookin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Exp:
Default

I don't think it's the question itself that people are responding to negatively as much as it is the timing of the new thread. Since the Monahan signing, the forum has been entirely focused on signing Johnny. One thread spiralled out of control discussing all things Johnny. Another one started showing signs of doing the same, and was promptly locked.

So of course, we got another Johnny thread. And of course, some people rolled their eyes to it, because FOI has been all Johnny all the time for a while now. Simple as that. Some people prefer discussion stay in one thread, others don't mind threads getting started about anything and everything. Some people get annoyed when conversation drifts off topic. Some people enjoy natural free flowing discussions that evolve. There's never going to be 100% consensus on how to approach these discussions. And sometimes people will be vocal about their disagreement. It happens.

Last edited by Finger Cookin; 08-26-2016 at 03:58 PM.
Finger Cookin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2016, 04:00 PM   #86
Badgers Nose
Franchise Player
 
Badgers Nose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1qqaaz View Post
Realistically, I think this is reasonable. The first might have to be conditional or something.
Really? Gostisbehere, Giroux, 1st?

I love Johnny, but surely you make that trade right now if its offered.

Giroux is signed for 4 years and elite.
Gostisbehere does not get paid big bucks until after Wideman is gone so he would fit long term.
A Philly first might be pretty high (top 15).
Badgers Nose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2016, 04:07 PM   #87
Gaudreauvertime
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Exp:
Default

I do wonder if teams are approaching Treliving about Johnny, given the status of negotiations.

If it were me, I'd have BT on speed dial and be sending edible arrangements to Burke.
Gaudreauvertime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2016, 04:12 PM   #88
Jacks
Franchise Player
 
Jacks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

If we were going to trade Gaudreau, and that is pretty doubtful, it probably wouldn't involve a defenceman. We are already likely to lose Kevin in the expansion draft, it makes no sense to bring in a top 4 defenceman if it means we then have to expose Hamilton. If we did trade him it would need to be for another elite forward otherwise let him hold out.

Last edited by Jacks; 08-26-2016 at 04:14 PM.
Jacks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2016, 04:21 PM   #89
FanIn80
GOAT!
 
FanIn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Exp:
Default

https://streamable.com/0bb8

Edit: Dammit, wrong thread. I'll leave it here anyway though...
FanIn80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2016, 04:57 PM   #90
topfiverecords
Franchise Player
 
topfiverecords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NuclearFart View Post
If the hot tub time machine is up and running, we should be asking for Gretzky, Lemieux and Orr .
But then logistically you're looking at a cloning machine first so each team gets a Gaudreau. You'd also want Oiler era Gretzky but no way would you want to see Gaudreau on the back of an Oilers jersey.

I'll take the 3 cups in 6 Blackhawk players.
topfiverecords is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2016, 10:25 PM   #91
mikephoen
#1 Goaltender
 
mikephoen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JiriHrdina View Post
Again.
Why did you click on a thread that was of no interest to you
Why then did you take the time to comment on that thread

It is clearly labeled. You have no obligation to say anything or read anything in this thread.

Simply move on to topics that are of interest to you.

So simple that it boggles my mind that people struggle with it.
Sometimes a thread is so crappy that it needs to be called out.

And based on the number of thanks the first two replies to this thread have, it would seem that a lot of people agree.
mikephoen is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mikephoen For This Useful Post:
Old 08-26-2016, 10:36 PM   #92
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacks View Post
If we were going to trade Gaudreau, and that is pretty doubtful, it probably wouldn't involve a defenceman. We are already likely to lose Kevin in the expansion draft, it makes no sense to bring in a top 4 defenceman if it means we then have to expose Hamilton. If we did trade him it would need to be for another elite forward otherwise let him hold out.
Ghost would be completing his second pro season and thus not need protection though, unless I'm still misunderstanding these expansion rules.
__________________
”All you have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to you.”

Rowan Roy W-M - February 15, 2024
GreenLantern2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2016, 11:02 PM   #93
Weitz
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Ghost Giroux and a 1st?

I think Philly runs fast from that. For the next 5 years no way I'd rather have Gaudreau than that package. And no Philly isn't calling to beg and overpay. If he would ever be traded it would be 1 for 1 of someone similar.
Weitz is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2016, 11:11 PM   #94
TheScorpion
First round-bust
 
TheScorpion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: speculating about AHL players
Exp:
Default

Imagine if he wanted to go to New Jersey.

How about a package centered around Cammalleri?
__________________
Need a great deal on a new or pre-owned car? Come see me at Platinum Mitsubishi — 2720 Barlow Trail NE

TheScorpion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2016, 11:19 PM   #95
Dajazz
Scoring Winger
 
Dajazz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Sweden
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion View Post
Imagine if he wanted to go to New Jersey.

How about a package centered around Cammalleri?
But it has to happen now to make sense?
Dajazz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dajazz For This Useful Post:
Old 08-26-2016, 11:36 PM   #96
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion View Post
Imagine if he wanted to go to New Jersey.

How about a package centered around Cammalleri?
Gaudreau for Hall.
__________________
”All you have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to you.”

Rowan Roy W-M - February 15, 2024
GreenLantern2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2016, 06:11 AM   #97
Gaudreauvertime
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLantern2814 View Post
Gaudreau for Hall.
Devils would have to add.

Hall + Blackwood would be interesting
Gaudreauvertime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2016, 06:17 AM   #98
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Gaudreau to the Isles for Strome, Barzal or Dal Colle depending on the weather that day and Sorokin.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2016, 06:49 AM   #99
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JiriHrdina View Post
Again.
Why did you click on a thread that was of no interest to you
Why then did you take the time to comment on that thread

It is clearly labeled. You have no obligation to say anything or read anything in this thread.

Simply move on to topics that are of interest to you.

So simple that it boggles my mind that people struggle with it.
At the same time, "this question is ridiculous" is a valid answer. And offering such a response is not the same thing as a topic holding no interest for the reader.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2016, 07:01 AM   #100
Gaudreauvertime
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14 View Post
At the same time, "this question is ridiculous" is a valid answer. And offering such a response is not the same thing as a topic holding no interest for the reader.
What's ridiculous about the question? Anyone can be traded. I would hope that's at least being considered in situations like these.
Gaudreauvertime is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:01 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy