Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-04-2015, 09:34 AM   #81
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

I think Russell knows what he is (a 4/5 guy) and also wants to be here.

With Brodie sitting at $4.6M, that helps define him in the $3 - 3.5M area.

And I agree that Wideman is a) easier to replace and b) offers much more savings re the cap.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2015, 10:45 AM   #82
Stay Golden
Franchise Player
 
Stay Golden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: STH since 2002
Exp:
Default

I don't think Russell will be difficult to netgotiate with if the Flames give him fair 2nd line D 4-5 money. 2.5-3.5 m per.
The guy sure gives his coach and teammates everything he can.
__________________
Stay Golden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2015, 01:57 PM   #83
Vulcan
Franchise Player
 
Vulcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
Exp:
Default

I wouldn't pay him more than the $2.6M he currently makes. The top players are going to get the big money at the cost of the middle of the road players. Russell is okay but he can be replaced by a prospect or cheap UFA.
Vulcan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2015, 02:08 PM   #84
The Yen Man
Franchise Player
 
The Yen Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Eric Francis was on with Rob Kerr on Friday, and he was proclaiming how Russell is worth 5-6M on the open market. I want to know what Francis is smoking pulling that one out of his rear. Think he used Klefbom as a benchmark lol.
The Yen Man is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2015, 02:12 PM   #85
goflamesgo18
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vulcan View Post
I wouldn't pay him more than the $2.6M he currently makes. The top players are going to get the big money at the cost of the middle of the road players. Russell is okay but he can be replaced by a prospect or cheap UFA.
goflamesgo18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2015, 02:15 PM   #86
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vulcan View Post
I wouldn't pay him more than the $2.6M he currently makes. The top players are going to get the big money at the cost of the middle of the road players. Russell is okay but he can be replaced by a prospect or cheap UFA.
Sorry but it isn't possible to replace top 4 defensemen as easily as you suggest.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2015, 02:18 PM   #87
goflamesgo18
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Exp:
Default

Russell was the Flames MVP after Gio went down. He deserves same contract as Brodie.
goflamesgo18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2015, 02:24 PM   #88
neo45
#1 Goaltender
 
neo45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Exp:
Default

I would have no problem with 20 million dollars over 5 or 6 years for this guy. I have liked him since the world juniors. I also love how so many people, including myself, had counted him out when St Louis gave up on him and he bounced back
neo45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2015, 02:26 PM   #89
herashak
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Exp:
Default

4 years 14 million
herashak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2015, 02:27 PM   #90
YYC in LAX
First Line Centre
 
YYC in LAX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by goflamesgo18 View Post
Russell was the Flames MVP after Gio went down. HNo he doesn't. Huge Kris Russell fan but he should absolutely not e deserves same contract as Brodie.
Disagree that he should get Brodie's contract. That's $1.5M/year too high IMO.
__________________

YYC in LAX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2015, 02:28 PM   #91
Vulcan
Franchise Player
 
Vulcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
Sorry but it isn't possible to replace top 4 defensemen as easily as you suggest.
I don't think he's a top 4 defenceman, I'd put him at a top 5. In a years' time, I'd be happy with Kulak taking his spot.
Vulcan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Vulcan For This Useful Post:
Old 10-04-2015, 02:42 PM   #92
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vulcan View Post
I don't think he's a top 4 defenceman, I'd put him at a top 5. In a years' time, I'd be happy with Kulak taking his spot.
Russell averaged 23:56 a game, so 24 mins. Russell had 283 blocked shots to least the entire league, 2nd place had 209. Which #5-6 defenseman on playoff teams in this league average 24 mins a game? None, that doesn't make any sense does it.

You'd have to be living in a pretty bizarro world for that to not represent a top 4 defenseman. You're selling him very, very, very short. I'm surprised anybody would attempt to claim he's not a top 4 defenseman, that's just silly. His play last year was easily that of a top 3-4 d-man. He looked like a top 4 defenseman, he performed like a top 4 d-man, he was utilized as a top 4 d-man. So yeah, he's a top 4 d-man quite easily.

Yes, that does mean the Flames have 5 d-men who are top 4, that's how you become good and be able to win through injuries.

Last edited by Flames Draft Watcher; 10-04-2015 at 02:44 PM.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
Old 10-04-2015, 03:03 PM   #93
Imported_Aussie
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

If Giordano makes 6.75
And Hamilton makes 5.75
And Brodie makes 4.65
Should Russell make 3.5-3.75?

4 years 14M?
3 years 11M?
Imported_Aussie is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Imported_Aussie For This Useful Post:
Old 10-04-2015, 03:09 PM   #94
Vulcan
Franchise Player
 
Vulcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
Russell averaged 23:56 a game, so 24 mins. Russell had 283 blocked shots to least the entire league, 2nd place had 209. Which #5-6 defenseman on playoff teams in this league average 24 mins a game? None, that doesn't make any sense does it.

You'd have to be living in a pretty bizarro world for that to not represent a top 4 defenseman. You're selling him very, very, very short. I'm surprised anybody would attempt to claim he's not a top 4 defenseman, that's just silly. His play last year was easily that of a top 3-4 d-man. He looked like a top 4 defenseman, he performed like a top 4 d-man, he was utilized as a top 4 d-man. So yeah, he's a top 4 d-man quite easily.

Yes, that does mean the Flames have 5 d-men who are top 4, that's how you become good and be able to win through injuries.
He was a top 4 last season on this team but he has some serious liabilities size wise. Yeah for a defenceman he is very, very, very short. He can't handle the big forwards with their cycle which was demonstrated against the Ducks and as has already been discussed there is a reason he needed to block so many shots. With the Hamilton acquisition he's only top 5 now and we don't need to pay a top 5 top 4 money or we'll get in serious cap trouble.

One thing our current management has been doing is overpaying some middling vets such as Raymond and Stajan. We don't want to make the same mistake with Russell as cap management is changing towards paying the stars top money while the rest get closer to the minimum. We saw this off season play out with middling UFA players having to sign for much less than previously or even get a contract and this trend will continue.
Vulcan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Vulcan For This Useful Post:
Old 10-04-2015, 03:42 PM   #95
goflamesgo18
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vulcan View Post
He was a top 4 last season on this team but he has some serious liabilities size wise. Yeah for a defenceman he is very, very, very short. He can't handle the big forwards with their cycle which was demonstrated against the Ducks and as has already been discussed there is a reason he needed to block so many shots. With the Hamilton acquisition he's only top 5 now and we don't need to pay a top 5 top 4 money or we'll get in serious cap trouble.

One thing our current management has been doing is overpaying some middling vets such as Raymond and Stajan. We don't want to make the same mistake with Russell as cap management is changing towards paying the stars top money while the rest get closer to the minimum. We saw this off season play out with middling UFA players having to sign for much less than previously or even get a contract and this trend will continue.

He had the best plus/minus on the team last year, playing mostly against other teams top lines. He's able to use his speed, skating, and high IQ to his advantage.

He is also 28 years old just entering his prime.

Don't know what you are smoking. This team would be a lot worse without him.
goflamesgo18 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to goflamesgo18 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-04-2015, 04:44 PM   #96
Strange Brew
Franchise Player
 
Strange Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

I am a little concerned the Flames may be sinking too much of their $'s in the defense corps.

I hope these teams that will be so willing to take on our bad contracts start identifying themselves soon.
Strange Brew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2015, 05:05 PM   #97
Fire of the Phoenix
#1 Goaltender
 
Fire of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Northern Crater
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Brew View Post
I am a little concerned the Flames may be sinking too much of their $'s in the defense corps.

I hope these teams that will be so willing to take on our bad contracts start identifying themselves soon.
The writing is clearly on the wall for Wideman. Whatever Russell makes next year will be significantly less than Wideman's current salary, and that's whose dollars he is taking IMO. We may actually have a cheaper defense next year.

Russell is not the problem, Smid and Engelland are.
Fire of the Phoenix is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Fire of the Phoenix For This Useful Post:
Old 10-04-2015, 05:05 PM   #98
genetic_phreek
First Line Centre
 
genetic_phreek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: VanCity
Exp:
icon57

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vulcan View Post
He was a top 4 last season on this team but he has some serious liabilities size wise. Yeah for a defenceman he is very, very, very short. He can't handle the big forwards with their cycle which was demonstrated against the Ducks and as has already been discussed there is a reason he needed to block so many shots. With the Hamilton acquisition he's only top 5 now and we don't need to pay a top 5 top 4 money or we'll get in serious cap trouble.


One thing our current management has been doing is overpaying some middling vets such as Raymond and Stajan. We don't want to make the same mistake with Russell as cap management is changing towards paying the stars top money while the rest get closer to the minimum. We saw this off season play out with middling UFA players having to sign for much less than previously or even get a contract and this trend will continue.
Funny you say he was a liability because of his size and make a point of emphasis against Anaheim but the reality is most defenseman in the NHL, regardless of size has trouble against the ducks.
genetic_phreek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2015, 05:09 PM   #99
Yanda
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Yanda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Exp:
Default

I would rather give Russell the extra 1.5 Mil to retain him for a few years than having to play Wotherspoon or Morrison. I think we can get him signed for under 4 Mil a season, and maybe as low as 3.
Yanda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2015, 05:25 PM   #100
Caged Great
Franchise Player
 
Caged Great's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

All I am hoping for is for the Flames to be able to find suitors for Smid and Engelland between now and this time next year so that they can put Kulak and one of Morrison/Wotherspoon in full time.
__________________
Fireside Chat - The #1 Flames Fan Podcast - FiresideChat.ca
Caged Great is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Caged Great For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:42 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy