Quote:
Originally Posted by CMPunk
Last year was Ramos best season in the NHL, so I don't know how he was "off".
|
Statistically speaking, yes. But from January to April in 2014 he posted the team's best save percentage @ 0.919, and had a winning record on a team that finished in 27th place. He looked generally more comfortable to me in that four month stretch than he did over the balance of the season last year, for whatever reason.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CMPunk
I just don't think at 29 Ramo is going to get much better, plus he's never played more then 45 games in a season. I'd rather keep Hiller who's been a capable #1 and keep the pressure off Ortio and let him ease into the starters role.
|
That's fair, and I think that is also generally true. However, I don't agree that his limited experience is a very good argument to retain Hiller in this situation. I flat out do not think that Hiller provides a better opportunity for the Flames to win games than does Ramo, and I don't believe that an additional handful of games (he played in 40 in 2013–14, and in 41 last season) is going to make all the difference.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
That's always the excuse with Ramo. The guy never settles as he's either really good or really bad. He is perfect for the same role he had last year in that when he gets the call he can go on a run of good play if given the chance then spelled once he slumps.
|
"Always"? Ramo only came back to the NHL after a four-year hiatus to start the 2013 season—two years ago. This is just totally disingenuous, as it fails to account for the rather significant transition he experienced at the start of his return.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
Having to depend on him for reliable 50+ starts is something the Oilers have been asking from career backups and we have seen the results. Dumping a proven NHL starting goaltender like Hiller who got the Flames into the playoffs for a career backup would be something I would expect from Kevin Lowe or Craig MacTavish.
|
Well, I guess we will see what happens. Although dumping the better of your two main options in goal is arguably much more stupid.
To put it simply: I don't expect Ortio to be exposed to waivers, which means that one of Hiller or Ramo will be traded in the next few weeks. This also means that the Flames quite possibly begin the season with all three on the roster. If Ramo shows better than Hiller in their first few starts, then I would expect Treliving to trade Hiller. I would not then judge this decision as a poor one on the sole basis of Hiller's longer resume.
I personally believe that Ramo is a better goalie than Hiller (technically more sound, laterally better, and with better rebound control), but I am not about to foolishly commit to the same air of certainty that punctuates your post.