Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Should the Flames use or threaten to use an offer sheet this year?
Yes, Flames should be exploring every option to improve the team. 94 32.64%
No, it is too early in the rebuild to consider it right now. The picks could be lottery picks. 80 27.78%
Never, offer sheets are too risky in terms of compensation and overpaid contracts. 63 21.88%
No, waste of time as the other team will definitetly match. 34 11.81%
No, don't think there is a player this year worth an offer sheet. 17 5.90%
Voters: 288. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-21-2015, 04:09 AM   #81
Philly06Cup
Closet Jedi
 
Philly06Cup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Finger Cookin View Post
You took the time to list the teams, but then not list the players? Boo.Who were the other players?

Edmonton: Penner, Vanek
Philadelphia: Weber, Kesler
Vancouver: Backes
St. Louis: Steve Bernier
San Jose: Hjalmarsson
Calgary: O'Reilly

I only know three off the top of my head.

EDIT: Bolded players I added after googling.
The Philly-Kesler offer sheet was amazing. Kesler was a relative nobody at the time, and Philly offered 1.9M/yr. Just below the next compensation threshold. Vancouver was right up to the cap and did not make signing Kesler a priority. It was a no-lose situation for Philly at that price, term, compensation (2nd rd pick).
__________________
Gaudreau > Huberdeau AINEC
Philly06Cup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2015, 05:15 AM   #82
T@T
Lifetime Suspension
 
T@T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Exp:
Default

List I would put in an offer sheet forjust for fun)

Vladimir Tarasenko(23), RW, 7 year 7.0m average (cost 1st/2nd/3rd)
Alex Galchenyuk(21), C, 7 year 5m average (cost 1st/3rd)
Tyler Toffoli(23), RW. 7 year 4.8m average (cost 1st/3rd)
Mikkel Boedker(25), RW/LW, 6 year 4.7m average (cost 1st/3rd)
Jakob Silfverberg(24), RW. 7 year 4.5m average (cost 1st/3rd)
Brett Connolly(23),RW, 3 years 1.825m average (cost 3rd)
Beau Bennett(23),RW, 3 years 1.825m average (cost 3rd)

Dougie Hamilton(21),RD,7 year 7.142m average (cost 1st/2nd/3rd)
David Rundblad(24),RD, 4 year 3.65m average (cost 2nd)
Eric Gelinas(24), LD, 4 years 3.33m average (cost 2nd)
Michael Del Zotto(24), RD, 3 year 1.825m average (cost 3rd)
T@T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2015, 06:55 AM   #83
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by T@T View Post
List I would put in an offer sheet forjust for fun)

Vladimir Tarasenko(23), RW, 7 year 7.0m average (4 first round picks)
Alex Galchenyuk(21), C, 7 year 5m average (cost 1st/2nd/3rd)
Tyler Toffoli(23), RW. 7 year 4.8m average (cost 1st/2nd/3rd)
Mikkel Boedker(25), RW/LW, 6 year 4.7m average (cost 1st/2nd/3rd)
Jakob Silfverberg(24), RW. 7 year 4.5m average (cost 1st/2nd/3rd)
Brett Connolly(23),RW, 3 years 1.825m average (cost 3rd)
Beau Bennett(23),RW, 3 years 1.825m average (cost 3rd)

Dougie Hamilton(21),RD,7 year 7.142m average (4 1st round picks)
David Rundblad(24),RD, 4 year 3.65m average (cost 2nd)
Eric Gelinas(24), LD, 4 years 3.33m average (cost 2nd)
Michael Del Zotto(24), RD, 3 year 1.825m average (cost 3rd)
fixed those compensations for you. For 5+ year deals you take the total $ and divide by 5, to calculate the average value for compensation purposes
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2015, 07:33 AM   #84
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

I don't think paying 4 first round picks is worth it for any of these players. The most I'd do would be a 1st, 2nd and 3rd and that would have to be for someone like Hamilton as he's going to be a #1 defensemen that you build a team around.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2015, 07:51 AM   #85
saillias
Franchise Player
 
saillias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Exp:
Default

I'd do the full price for Tarasenko. I'd give up the O'Reilly price for Saad or Toffoli. I don't think I really want Hamilton at what he would cost. He's no Chara or Weber.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobHopper View Post
The thing is, my posts, thoughts and insights may be my opinions but they're also quite factual.
saillias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2015, 08:19 AM   #86
Murph
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Murph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bonavista, Newfoundland
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by saillias View Post
I'd do the full price for Tarasenko. I'd give up the O'Reilly price for Saad or Toffoli. I don't think I really want Hamilton at what he would cost. He's no Chara or Weber.
Not so sure on Hamliton. I think he might be the real deal, and the Bruins are in a really tight spot. Haven't seen it mentioned, but the Bruins have to sign 6 players for next year and only have $7M in cap space to do it (assuming the $71.5M salary cap that Bettman predicted). If Hamilton signed a $7M offer sheet (1st, 2nd, 3rd compensation) and the Burins matched, they'd have to trade away ~$3.5M in salary just to sign the remaining 6 players they'd need to league minimum deals.

Translation? Hamilton can be had for a 1st, 2nd and 3rd round pick. Personally, I think he's worth it, and we can fit him into our salary structure going forward.

Last edited by Murph; 05-21-2015 at 08:23 AM.
Murph is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Murph For This Useful Post:
Old 05-21-2015, 09:45 AM   #87
united
#1 Goaltender
 
united's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Exp:
Default

After a quick browse, I think there is four players I would give consideration to...of course weighing the value of next year's draft picks given the top three picks are lottery assigned. Three players everyone talks about and Jimmy Hayes who could be a sleeper.

Vladimir Tarasenko
23-year-old left-shooting right winder coming off a 37-goal, 73-point season. Everyone knows what this kid is already capable of! I like that he's already big at 6'0, 220, with room to fill out a bit more. The Blues have $12 million to sign 4 forwards, 3 defencemen, and a backup goalie. Unfortunately you are probably looking at two first-round picks+a second-round pick+a third-round pick or if you went short-term 1st+2nd+3rd. Added bonus is potentially hampering a conference rival a bit cap wise.

Tyler Toffoli
23-year-old right-shooting right winger coming off a 23-goal, 49-point season. He fills a big organizational need and seems to get better every time I see him. The Kings have $9 million to sign 4 forwards, 2 defencemen, and a backup goalie, and are our direct divisional rivals. Getting Toffoli fills a big organizational hole and his ceiling appears to be really high. If you miss him, at least you can hamper a direct rival's cap situation a bit more. Of course the Voynov situation is still unknown. And then there's Mike Richards. Cost is probably a first-round pick+second-round pick+third-round pick.

Dougie Hamilton
21-year-old right-shooting defenceman coming off a 10-goal, 42-point season. He's already 6'5 and is expected to fill out around 230 pounds. He has the rare combination of a giant who can skate, shoot, and defend competently...and the bonus of shooting right-handed. Like Toffoli, the ceiling for Hamilton is really high. The Bruins have $5.5 million to sign 3 forwards, 3 defencemen, and a backup goalie. Like Tarasenko, you would probably have to settle with losing 2x1sts+2nd+3rd or perhaps if you went shorter term 1st+2nd+3rd.

Jimmy Hayes
A less popular name, but he could be a fit. A bit older at 25, but he's a right-shooting right winger coming off a 19-goal, 35-point season. Where I think he fits is the Flames' claims they want to get bigger: he's 6'6, 220. Now he doesn't exactly play mean or "truculent", so maybe just being big isn't enough for what Treliving/Burke want, but he definitely fits the need for a right winger and a bigger body up front. The Panthers have more cap space than the Kings or Bruins, with $17 million to sign 4 forwards and 2 defencemen, but I presume they have an internal cap lower than the true salary cap. If you get him for a second-round pick maybe you think about it. Probably not anything more.
__________________
"I think the eye test is still good, but analytics can sure give you confirmation: what you see...is that what you really believe?"
Scotty Bowman, 0 NHL games played

Last edited by united; 05-21-2015 at 02:22 PM.
united is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to united For This Useful Post:
Old 05-21-2015, 09:47 PM   #88
Bs&Cs
Backup Goalie
 
Bs&Cs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Murph View Post
Not so sure on Hamliton. I think he might be the real deal, and the Bruins are in a really tight spot. Haven't seen it mentioned, but the Bruins have to sign 6 players for next year and only have $7M in cap space to do it (assuming the $71.5M salary cap that Bettman predicted). If Hamilton signed a $7M offer sheet (1st, 2nd, 3rd compensation) and the Burins matched, they'd have to trade away ~$3.5M in salary just to sign the remaining 6 players they'd need to league minimum deals.

Translation? Hamilton can be had for a 1st, 2nd and 3rd round pick. Personally, I think he's worth it, and we can fit him into our salary structure going forward.
The Bruins would have no issue shipping Kelly, Smith, Eriksson, Seidenberg hell even Lucic off if it keeps Dougie in black and gold. The Bruins will match any offer for Hamilton, 100% guaranteed. The Bruins need a backup goalie and to resign three RFAs which includes Hamilton, the other two being Spooner and Connolly which will be cheap. They need to shed cap through trade if they want to add a scoring winger or a defencemen. If not they have quite a few kids coming up the ranks to plug whatever holes there might be if there's no money left. And if there are cap casualties it definitely won't be Hamilton I can tell you that.

Last edited by Bs&Cs; 05-21-2015 at 09:51 PM.
Bs&Cs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2015, 07:40 AM   #89
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Always thought there was something behind the scenes between Jimmy Hayes and Brian Burke.

Burke traded him for a 2010 2nd round pick which he then used to draft a smaller player in Brad Ross.

This was during the time he wanted truculence and size added to the Leafs. It is also pretty rare to see a prospect traded for a pick 2 years after he was drafted.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2015, 12:17 PM   #90
Macho0978
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

I would consider one for sure. I would trade our first in next draft for Hamilton or Tarasenko, not sure who wouldn't. Even if we miss the playoffs they have to be in the league of the guys taken in the top 5 if not as good as Austin Matthews. But I can't see us not being a threat to make the playoffs annually and eventually a cup contender adding guys like Tarasenko or Hamilton

I would also consider a lower end offer sheet too. Saad for a 2nd round pick could be realistic. If Chicago matches you could put them in a tougher spot then they already are by giving Saad a little bit more then they would have to give him on a 1 year deal.
Macho0978 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2015, 12:55 PM   #91
Robbob
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

Giving Saad a poison pill contract like O'Reily is what I would be tempted to do. First year 2.5 and the second year 4.5. Make it so if they keep him the qualifying offer is escalated. It would cost us a 2nd
Robbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2015, 01:49 PM   #92
AcGold
Self-Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Exp:
Default

Hamilton on the Flames would be unreal. Under Hartley's tutelage the sky is the limit for him, we'd be set for a decade in that spot.
AcGold is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to AcGold For This Useful Post:
Old 05-22-2015, 01:56 PM   #93
Daradon
Has lived the dream!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Where I lay my head is home...
Exp:
Default

I know a few offer sheet and like practices that have failed, can anyone tell me of one they thought was a slam dunk?

I'm asking honestly, cause there's got to be one or two, right?
Daradon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2015, 01:59 PM   #94
saillias
Franchise Player
 
saillias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daradon View Post
I know a few offer sheet and like practices that have failed, can anyone tell me of one they thought was a slam dunk?

I'm asking honestly, cause there's got to be one or two, right?
Scott Stevens
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobHopper View Post
The thing is, my posts, thoughts and insights may be my opinions but they're also quite factual.
saillias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2015, 02:23 PM   #95
Robbob
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

Al MacInnis was also an offer sheet from the blues and then they worked out the trade for Housley and picks
Robbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2015, 02:36 PM   #96
Robbob
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

The more I think about it, screw we are due for a defenseman after losing MacInnis to an offer sheet. Looking up STL offer sheet, the 3.5 million over 4 years was enough to make MacInnis the 4th highest paid dman in the league at the time.
Robbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2015, 04:13 PM   #97
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

The more I look at the RFA landscape this off season the more I think teams like Dallas, Winnipeg, NYI, Panthers, Caps and Flames can add a good "vet" on a cheap trade.

More so Dallas, Florida and the Islanders than anyone else. The Stars will be motivated to add a guy like Sharp or Chara to get them over the hump and the Isles have incredible depth in their prospect pool to spend a bit on adding a guy like Sharp.

Not to mention Detroit too. They can re-tool on the fly as well.

Offer sheets may be moot this year.

Last edited by dammage79; 05-22-2015 at 04:30 PM.
dammage79 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2015, 05:16 PM   #98
Sylvanfan
Appealing my suspension
 
Sylvanfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Just outside Enemy Lines
Exp:
Default

Yeah, I think Boston dumps a guy like Seidenberg for a 7th before they let Dougie Hamilton get away, unless they're getting a real sweetheart of an offer.

No doubt Boston and the Rangers are two teams who seem to be in a bit of a cap bind, but I suspect they have a few other guys that they're willing to move on from before they let Hamilton go. No question though Hamilton is a guy that I'd be willing to make a pretty strong offer if they were willing though.
__________________
"Some guys like old balls"
Patriots QB Tom Brady
Sylvanfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2015, 05:18 PM   #99
Murph
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Murph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bonavista, Newfoundland
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Murph View Post
Not so sure on Hamliton. I think he might be the real deal, and the Bruins are in a really tight spot. Haven't seen it mentioned, but the Bruins have to sign 6 players for next year and only have $7M in cap space to do it (assuming the $71.5M salary cap that Bettman predicted). If Hamilton signed a $7M offer sheet (1st, 2nd, 3rd compensation) and the Burins matched, they'd have to trade away ~$3.5M in salary just to sign the remaining 6 players they'd need to league minimum deals.

Translation? Hamilton can be had for a 1st, 2nd and 3rd round pick. Personally, I think he's worth it, and we can fit him into our salary structure going forward.
I hate to quote myself, but I used General Fanager when I did the math and I made a mistake. The cap hit calculated by the site includes Marc Savard's $4M+. Seems the Bruins aren't as tight up against it as I thought.
Murph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2015, 02:19 PM   #100
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

So looks like the answer is yes.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:16 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy