05-10-2015, 05:51 PM
|
#81
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
|
So here is the current flames signed for next year
Gio-Brodie
Russell-Wideman
Smid-Engellend
Wortherspoon
Now is Smid going to play? If he does that third pairing is a nightmare. If Smid can be moved that would be the best as I prefer Enegellend. It would be nice if Spoon could solidify a spot but I look at the #5 LHD spot. Either fill with a young guy via trade or i agree sign Erhoff to a 2 year deal. He would be a good partner for Engellend and would be another option on the PP
|
|
|
05-10-2015, 07:03 PM
|
#82
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Northern Crater
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79
Of that UFA list I wonder if a 2 year deal to Erhoff would be good. He fits the Flames skating style of play from the back end. Added weapon on the PP too. Has a Wideman esque knack for getting the puck to the net from the point.
Other than that, the usual suspects like Franson and McQuaid would be my favorites. But Erhoff just screams of a smart signing for the Flames.
|
Erhoff would be my first choice but I doubt he'll sign here given our top 4. I wouldn't be against offering him 2 years @ $7.5m per. Sounds crazy but that's probably what it would take for him to consider us on a short term contract.
|
|
|
05-10-2015, 07:46 PM
|
#83
|
Franchise Player
|
I think to judge whether which one to keep, you need to look at size and speed. Maybe you don't keep any of them if the physicalities aren't there. Flames currently have lots of mobility on the top 4 d-men, but they lack size. I really miss Regehr where he punishes players in his own zone. Players like Hemsky and Coligliano would go into the Flames zone looking over their shoulders, but now, they just freewheel in and do whatever they want.
|
|
|
05-11-2015, 08:56 AM
|
#84
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Silicon Valley
|
I think the answer is pretty obvious based upon the way Hartley used his D and Treiliving comments on Schlemko... Potter didnt really play at all this year, he's gone. Schlemko can play up the roster, he's going to be brought back for sure. Diaz I'm a bit less sure about, but I think Hartley really likes his game so he stays.
No silly UFA signings or overpay for trades
Keep 8 NHL D in case of injury, risk losing one to waivers.
Gio - Brodie
Russell - Wideman
Engelland - Schlemko
Diaz / Smid fight it out for the last spot
Wotherspoon, Ramage, Kulek for our callups.
Thats a pretty good lineup... no need for UFA signings or trades.
__________________
"With a coach and a player, sometimes there's just so much respect there that it's boils over"
-Taylor Hall
|
|
|
05-11-2015, 08:59 AM
|
#85
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: I don't belong here
|
Schlemko and Wotherspoon can fight it out for the last spot, should Wotherspoon prove he is ready. I think next year is the time for him (Wotherspoon) to make his jump into becoming a more trusted player for Hartley to use. Schlemko is a great addition to this team so I would keep him as that 6/7 assurance. Maybe Schlemko, Engelland and Wotherspoon rotate in and out of the line up pending on who is playing the best.
|
|
|
05-11-2015, 09:49 AM
|
#86
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
|
Need to find one more top 4 defensemen to push Wideman or Russel down and keep Schlemko as a 7. Then we will have a solid defense core. Smid should survive waivers or else just carry 8 up and one less forward.
Definately need to upgrade if we want to contend for the division and not just a playoff spot. Its also an area that now or later we need to fix externally as we dont have the prospects to solve the problem in house
|
|
|
05-11-2015, 10:03 AM
|
#87
|
Ate 100 Treadmills
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cannon7
Really depends on who we can add to the blueline in the offseason. Have been pleased with Schlemko and Diaz in a third pairing role, though. Realistically we should have 8 d-men, so if Schlemko and Diaz are 2/3rds of the #6-8 then I'm OK with that. Would like to see Engelland as a part of that trio and instead sign a Green off the UFA market.
Giordano
Brodie
Russell
Wideman
UFA
Engelland
Schlemko
Diaz
That'd look good to me. If Wotherspoon or another prospect make a push then we could move one of the vets.
|
I really see us adding a 2nd pairing d-man shut down d-man and another David Jones type forward. It was fairly apparent that the Flames lacked size. The kids will all get bigger and stronger next year, but we really need to be harder to play against and have an answer for a team like the Ducks size. Wideman and Giordano both have descent physical aspects to their play, but the top 4 as a whole is relatively soft. They make up for it by skating hard, but that doesn't create the same effect.
|
|
|
05-11-2015, 11:58 AM
|
#88
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
I'd sign all three. Stockton needs D as well. I think Diaz and Potter can safely be sent down if they are shoved out of an NHL spot (and even if they get picked up on waivers, no big deal).
|
|
|
05-11-2015, 12:51 PM
|
#89
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
I'd sign all three. Stockton needs D as well. I think Diaz and Potter can safely be sent down if they are shoved out of an NHL spot (and even if they get picked up on waivers, no big deal).
|
Does Stockton need D?
Kulak
Culkin
Kanzig
Ramage
Morrison
Sieloff
Also possibly:
Wotherspoon
Roy
Acolatse
Cundari
|
|
|
05-11-2015, 12:55 PM
|
#90
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire
Does Stockton need D?
Kulak
Culkin
Kanzig
Ramage
Morrison
Sieloff
Also possibly:
Wotherspoon
Roy
Acolatse
Cundari
|
+ potentially Billins unless he really wants to spend his whole career in Europe. He was Abby's #1 in 13-14.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobHopper
The thing is, my posts, thoughts and insights may be my opinions but they're also quite factual.
|
|
|
|
05-11-2015, 01:07 PM
|
#91
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire
Does Stockton need D?
Kulak
Culkin
Kanzig
Ramage
Morrison
Sieloff
Also possibly:
Wotherspoon
Roy
Acolatse
Cundari
|
I think Stockton's D pool is broad but not deep. Obviously Morrison is a guy they want to see more of. The rest? I'm not too too impressed with Ramage or Seiloff so far. Wotherspoon is either up or out next year, I think. Acolatse and the 5'9" Cundari don't have much of a future. I'd rather have Diaz playing and being an injury callup than them. Culkin is a question mark for me. he could make it one day.
|
|
|
05-11-2015, 01:32 PM
|
#92
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
I think Stockton's D pool is broad but not deep. Obviously Morrison is a guy they want to see more of. The rest? I'm not too too impressed with Ramage or Seiloff so far. Wotherspoon is either up or out next year, I think. Acolatse and the 5'9" Cundari don't have much of a future. I'd rather have Diaz playing and being an injury callup than them. Culkin is a question mark for me. he could make it one day.
|
1. Giordano
2. Brodie
3. Wideman
4. Russell
5. Engelland
6. Smid (LTIR?)
NHL top 4 is set, barring a trade. Not sure about Smid, but if his career is in jeopardy then there might be a #6 spot for a young guy, but I doubt they leave it open....not this teams MO. Likely see a guy like Diaz or Schlemko back.....or both....or another UFA signing.
1. (22) Wotherspoon (ELC)
2. (23) Morrison (ELC)
3. (21) Kulak (ELC)
4. (21) Culkin (ELC)
5. (21) Sieloff (ELC)
6. (20) Kanzig (ELC)
7. (24) Ramage (RFA)
8. (25) Acolatse (RFA)
9. (25) Cundari (UFA VI)
10. (26) Stevenson (AHL)
11. (24) Yevenko (AHL)
12. (20) Roy (Unsigned)
13. (26) Billins (RFA)
Even without signing the bottom 4-5 guys on this list, 8-9 D-men to build an AHL defense group with. Going to be a log jam for sure, and plenty of young, inexperienced (1st/2nd year) guys leading the way too. As mentioned by Caged Great, I wouldn't be surprised if some of the "vets" are brought back and we end up with several Dmen playing in the ECHL next year.
Really don't think we need Potter signed.
|
|
|
05-11-2015, 01:40 PM
|
#93
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Silicon Valley
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
I think Stockton's D pool is broad but not deep. Obviously Morrison is a guy they want to see more of. The rest? I'm not too too impressed with Ramage or Seiloff so far. Wotherspoon is either up or out next year, I think. Acolatse and the 5'9" Cundari don't have much of a future. I'd rather have Diaz playing and being an injury callup than them. Culkin is a question mark for me. he could make it one day.
|
You might not have been impressed but listening to Ryan Huska talk he was impressed with Ramage. Sieloff will be moved back to D as well.
__________________
"With a coach and a player, sometimes there's just so much respect there that it's boils over"
-Taylor Hall
|
|
|
05-11-2015, 02:13 PM
|
#94
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Calgary
|
I think Schlemko did an admirable job stepping into an unfamiliar and banged up D corps. I'd like to see what he can do with a full season in Flames silks.
Potter and Diaz are serviceable, but easily replaced. I'd like to see the Flames take a run at Petry in the off-season.
|
|
|
05-11-2015, 03:54 PM
|
#95
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hatter
I think Schlemko did an admirable job stepping into an unfamiliar and banged up D corps. I'd like to see what he can do with a full season in Flames silks.
Potter and Diaz are serviceable, but easily replaced. I'd like to see the Flames take a run at Petry in the off-season.
|
Petry would kill the Oilers.
|
|
|
05-11-2015, 07:53 PM
|
#96
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
|
Petry has been very good for Montreal.
Would be a good fit here, I think.
I expect cost will be significant though.
|
|
|
05-11-2015, 10:00 PM
|
#97
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: STH since 2002
|
Between Diaz, Schlemko and Potter you keep Schlemko 10 out 10 times.
__________________
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:59 AM.
|
|