Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-19-2015, 03:29 PM   #81
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mattyc View Post
even if he wasn't, i would think it would be a better idea to wait out until he decides to go to free agency and sign him then and spend a pick on a different player than to pick an overage ncaa player who can't sign until leaving anyways. That is, unless he was absolutely destroying the ncaa.

How would he be handled under the cba if he had been a year younger in his freshman year? Would he become ufa earlier than most, or does the 4 years at college still apply?
cba:

Quote:
if a player drafted at age 20 or older is a bona fide college student at the
time of his selection or becomes a bona fide college student while his
drafting club retains exclusive rights, then his drafting club shall retain
those rights until the later of: (a) the second june 1 following the date of
his selection, or (b) thirty (30) days after nhl central registry receives
notice that the player is no longer a bona fide college student; provided
that if the player: (1) is in his fourth year of college and has commenced
his fourth year of ncaa eligibility and the player ceases to be a bona fide
college student on or after january 1 of an academic year, or (2) is in his
fourth year of college, is scheduled to graduate from college at the end of
his fourth year and the player ceases to be a bona fide college student on
or after january 1 of an academic year, or (3) remains a bona fide college
student through the graduation of his college class, then in the
circumstances described in (1) or (2) or (3), the club shall retain the
exclusive right of negotiation for such player's services through and
including august 15 of that calendar year.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 03-19-2015, 03:42 PM   #82
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by polak View Post
Seems like for the most part these NCAA UFA's turn out to be AHL fodder.
Like Jooris and Glencross?
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2015, 03:49 PM   #83
sharkov
Powerplay Quarterback
 
sharkov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Exp:
Default

We could always use more defensive prospects
__________________
"Half the GM's in the league would trade their roster for our roster right now..." Kevin Lowe in 2013
sharkov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2015, 03:50 PM   #84
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Sure would be a nice shot in the arm on the defensive prospect front.

With the way Hickey and Rafikov are starting to shape up, and adding Morrison along with Wotherspoon, and then hopefully score a couple good picks in June, and suddenly things are looking a lot better.

As for how this affects Wotherspoon - the only way it does is increased competition. And if that is a problem for Wotherspoon, then maybe he doesn't have what it takes.

What I see is two pretty big (both 6'2"), good skating, puck moving defensemen that could become a heck of a defense pairing. Wotherspoon is smart and Morrison has a cannon.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2015, 03:53 PM   #85
Knut
 
Knut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by polak View Post
Seems like for the most part these NCAA UFA's turn out to be AHL fodder.
Seems like more of them are sticking now though. Maybe NCAA is better developing some of these guys.

Krug, Dekyser, Folin are some recent examples of picking up solid Dmen out of the NCAA.
Knut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2015, 03:53 PM   #86
GranteedEV
Franchise Player
 
GranteedEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
With the way Hickey and Rafikov are starting to shape up, and adding Morrison along with Wotherspoon, and then hopefully score a couple good picks in June, and suddenly things are looking a lot better.
No love for our Brodie-clones Kulak and Culkin?
__________________

"May those who accept their fate find happiness. May those who defy it find glory."
GranteedEV is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GranteedEV For This Useful Post:
14
Old 03-19-2015, 03:54 PM   #87
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
Like Jooris and Glencross?
More like Knight and Van Brabant.

I'm not saying this is a bad pick up, just that I've stopped getting excited over these NCAA free agent guys like I used to.
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2015, 03:55 PM   #88
corporatejay
Franchise Player
 
corporatejay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by polak View Post
More like Knight and Van Brabant.

I'm not saying this is a bad pick up, just that I've stopped getting excited over these NCAA free agent guys like I used to.
Didn't we get Drew Shore for Knight? Seems like a great pick-up.
__________________
corporatejay is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to corporatejay For This Useful Post:
Old 03-19-2015, 03:55 PM   #89
looooob
Franchise Player
 
looooob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
Like Jooris and Glencross?
bourque and penner too? (ok yes they aren't exactly shiny anymore but they had their moments in the NHL)
looooob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2015, 03:56 PM   #90
Hemi-Cuda
wins 10 internets
 
Hemi-Cuda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: slightly to the left
Exp:
Default

When Calgary can churn out fantastic late bloomer defencemen like Gio, Brodie, and now Russell, it must certainly help to sway potential free agents who want to develop into impact players
Hemi-Cuda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2015, 03:58 PM   #91
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemi-Cuda View Post
When Calgary can churn out fantastic late bloomer defencemen like Gio, Brodie, and now Russell, it must certainly help to sway potential free agents who want to develop into impact players
Who wouldn't want to turn into an impact player?

But this is a good point. We have had some luck with late bloomers.
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2015, 03:59 PM   #92
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GranteedEV View Post
No love for our Brodie-clones Kulak and Culkin?
I think the chances of the other guys becoming NHLers is higher than it is with these guys. Just my opinion but I don't have them as having a tremendous amount of upside.

Never know with defensemen though, that's why more is better.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2015, 04:02 PM   #93
EldrickOnIce
Franchise Player
 
EldrickOnIce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by polak View Post
More like Knight and Van Brabant.

I'm not saying this is a bad pick up, just that I've stopped getting excited over these NCAA free agent guys like I used to.
Knight was drafted, so not a free agent.
His point was Glencross and Jooris are examples of undrafted college free agents.
And yes... a lot won't work out, but Jooris was a great (free) pickup.
EldrickOnIce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2015, 04:05 PM   #94
GranteedEV
Franchise Player
 
GranteedEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by polak View Post
More like Knight and Van Brabant.

I'm not saying this is a bad pick up, just that I've stopped getting excited over these NCAA free agent guys like I used to.
We traded for Knight who was drafted, and then flipped him back for Shore, who's an NHLer.

Van Brabant might not be an NHLer but I'd say Garnet Hathaway will be. Bottom liner but an effective one.

Jooris is already an effective 3rd liner, and should be more effective when he gets to scoot over to Backlund or Bennett's wing.
__________________

"May those who accept their fate find happiness. May those who defy it find glory."

Last edited by GranteedEV; 03-19-2015 at 04:07 PM.
GranteedEV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2015, 04:07 PM   #95
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemi-Cuda View Post
When Calgary can churn out fantastic late bloomer defencemen like Gio, Brodie, and now Russell, it must certainly help to sway potential free agents who want to develop into impact players
I wouldn't call Brodie a late bloomer. This is the fourth straight season where he'll play more than half the Flames' games and he hasn't even celebrated his 25th birthday. If anything, he was an early bloomer.

Russell was also an NHL regular at the age of 20 and had more than 300 NHL games under his belt before he joined the Flames. He struggled in St Louis, but had decent stats in Columbus. Now, he's 27, which is about the age where defencemen hit their prime.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2015, 04:13 PM   #96
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EldrickOnIce View Post
Knight was drafted, so not a free agent.
His point was Glencross and Jooris are examples of undrafted college free agents.
And yes... a lot won't work out, but Jooris was a great (free) pickup.
Knight was an impending Free Agent.

In the Flames eyes it was pretty close. Sure we traded him for a better player but doesn't make Knight any better.
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2015, 04:16 PM   #97
CroFlames
Franchise Player
 
CroFlames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

I see no harm in giving this kid a shot if he is willing to come to Calgary.

He could replace Potter.
CroFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2015, 04:17 PM   #98
killer_carlson
Franchise Player
 
killer_carlson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

nm
__________________
"OOOOOOHHHHHHH those Russians" - Boney M
killer_carlson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2015, 04:17 PM   #99
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Whenever something gets CP excited or optimistic along comes Polak.

dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to dissentowner For This Useful Post:
Old 03-19-2015, 04:19 PM   #100
neo45
#1 Goaltender
 
neo45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Exp:
Default

If we get him it will be a similar scenario as to when we signed Brady Lamb out of college a few seasons ago. Didn't work out with Lamb but always worth a shot
neo45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:50 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy