02-26-2015, 04:39 PM
|
#81
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy
So obviously Calgary wasn't going to trade the Jackets a "Clarkson" in exchange for Horton's contract because we don't have a deal that atrocious........I wonder what BT was looking at getting in return for taking Horton's contract?
|
a pick and Jones? Maybe just a first? He tried to buy a pick with cap space twice this summer.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
|
|
|
|
02-26-2015, 04:39 PM
|
#82
|
Fearmongerer
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Badgers Nose
It does if they are trading Phil Dion and Jeoffrey for picks and prospects this week and at the draft.
|
How so?
They dont need cap space to trade those guys away....and if this is to reach the floor...well would be hilarious...but i guess its a possibility.
|
|
|
02-26-2015, 04:39 PM
|
#83
|
In the Sin Bin
|
TSN also just had a good point. Since the Jackets aren't a cap team, they don't even get the LTIR relief. So they were literally paying for nothing. Clarkson is at least a warm body, I suppose.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Resolute 14 For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-26-2015, 04:40 PM
|
#84
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary
|
I get that Columbus will save some actual cash, but it must put them in a worse spot cap-wise. What now works for Toronto, would have worked for Columbus as well, had they kept Horton, no? They have a few crappy contracts on the team already, IMO.
Edit: ^ Thanks Resolute, that does make more sense. Need to be a cap team for it to really make a difference.
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
Last edited by Fighting Banana Slug; 02-26-2015 at 04:42 PM.
|
|
|
02-26-2015, 04:40 PM
|
#85
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy
So obviously Calgary wasn't going to trade the Jackets a "Clarkson" in exchange for Horton's contract because we don't have a deal that atrocious........I wonder what BT was looking at getting in return for taking Horton's contract?
|
probably someone like Stajan and wanted a high pick as compensation for eating the Clarkson contract.
|
|
|
02-26-2015, 04:40 PM
|
#86
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ1532
All Nonis needs to do now is get Phaneuf off the books without any retention and he's a shoe in for GM of the year.
|
I wouldn't go that far, he may have cleaned up the bed but he's the one who crapped in it in the first place.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozy_Flame
Why would we do this? Are we trying to save cap space? Weird thing for us to do.
|
Would have made great sense for us. We wouldn't have to worry about the cap floor anymore and would have the flexibility to play some younger cheaper guys. If we needed the cap room we simply LTIR the contract. In the meantime we dump 2 older players and possibly gain an asset from Columbus as a cherry on top. Would have cost us a bunch of cash though.
|
|
|
02-26-2015, 04:41 PM
|
#87
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79
CLB as a mid/small market team really couldn't afford to pay Horton to not pay. Also, stupid not to insure the contract.
|
Contract was uninsurable due to Horton's previous history of injuries.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Flash Walken For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-26-2015, 04:41 PM
|
#88
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Calgary
|
Good trade for both teams, realitically TO was one of, if not the only team that would be willing to pull this trade off. Not many owners are in the position of being able/willing to just shell out 25+ million bucks for some extra cap room.
|
|
|
02-26-2015, 04:42 PM
|
#89
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacks
I wouldn't go that far, he may have cleaned up the bed but he's the one who crapped in it in the first place.
|
Did I need green text? Thought the sarcasm would have obvious?
|
|
|
02-26-2015, 04:42 PM
|
#90
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fighting Banana Slug
I get that Columbus will save some actual cash, but it must put them in a worse spot cap-wise. What now works for Toronto, would have worked for Columbus as well, had they kept Horton, no? They have a few crappy contracts on the team already, IMO.
|
They have 5.4M left in capspace roughly after this trade. Nothing imminent that they need to take care of this season, and they're already looking to move Wiz. Don't think that this is a big issue for them considering what they are as a team.
|
|
|
02-26-2015, 04:43 PM
|
#91
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash Walken
Contract was uninsurable due to Horton's previous history of injuries.
|
I actually do remember that concern being brought up when Horton was heading into FA. Specifically Bob McKenzie bringing it up. So doubly Stupid to offer up the high dollar amount contract. NVM the term.
|
|
|
02-26-2015, 04:45 PM
|
#92
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14
TSN also just had a good point. Since the Jackets aren't a cap team, they don't even get the LTIR relief. So they were literally paying for nothing. Clarkson is at least a warm body, I suppose.
|
This is very interesting from the Flames perspective. The LTIR relief really only helps those teams at the cap. If we were going to pick up Horton, it would make sense that we would be spending a lot more this summer/deadline, as well. Or, on the other hand, gets us to the floor.
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
Last edited by Fighting Banana Slug; 02-26-2015 at 04:47 PM.
|
|
|
02-26-2015, 04:45 PM
|
#93
|
Franchise Player
|
By the time his contract expires, Clarkson will be paid 27.5M in real dollars by Columbus. Horton, 26.1M by Toronto.
Last edited by Anduril; 02-26-2015 at 04:47 PM.
|
|
|
02-26-2015, 04:45 PM
|
#94
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79
I actually do remember that concern being brought up when Horton was heading into FA. Specifically Bob McKenzie bringing it up. So doubly Stupid to offer up the high dollar amount contract. NVM the term.
|
With hindsight, a really bad decision.
|
|
|
02-26-2015, 04:45 PM
|
#95
|
Franchise Player
|
CBJ on an internal cap, so money against the cap or on LTIR is all the same to them. They just probably saw it as an asset playing, or not playing.
__________________
"By Grabthar's hammer ... what a savings."
|
|
|
02-26-2015, 04:47 PM
|
#96
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fighting Banana Slug
This is very interesting from the Flames perspective. The LTIR relief really only helps those teams at the cap. If we were going to pick up Horton, it would make sense that we would be spending a lot more this summer/deadline, as well.
|
not necessary ... it could have also just helped us reach the floor even if we dumped contracts like Raymond/Engelland/etc and iced a very young team next season.
|
|
|
02-26-2015, 04:50 PM
|
#97
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by devo22
not necessary ... it could have also just helped us reach the floor even if we dumped contracts like Raymond/Engelland/etc and iced a very young team next season.
|
Agreed. I amended my post after thinking about it more. Still, I think it does open up the possiblitity of other bigger cap-related deals.
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
|
|
|
02-26-2015, 04:50 PM
|
#98
|
Franchise Player
|
Jeff Svoboda @JeffSvoboda Follow CBJ didn't have insurance on Horton? They play in NATIONWIDE ARENA.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to JurassicTunga12 For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-26-2015, 04:52 PM
|
#99
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JurassicTunga12
|
Apparently Nationwide is not on their side on this one. Nationwide is sitting this one out.
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!
This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.
The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans
If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Locke For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-26-2015, 04:52 PM
|
#100
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99
Another thing about this deal...the Leafs get cap relief of Hortons contract, but that does not kick in until the season begins....meaning they cannot use that space until training camps etc are all done and although they can exceed the limit by 10% through the summer, they must be compliant before the season starts...which would have to include that 6 million tag.
|
My understanding is that a player can be placed on LTIR in order to make the team cap compliant on the first day of the season; they don't have to be compliant before putting the player on LTIR. That, I believe, is how the Flyers have handled Pronger's cap hit.
So the Leafs can exceed the cap by 10% (about $7 million at present) during the off season, of which $6 million will be taken up by Horton's contract. Once the season starts, they can exceed the cap by the amount of Horton's contract.
The only things they give up are some flexibility to exceed the cap during the off season (which most teams don't use anyway), and the actual money to pay Horton with (which doesn't matter, because the Leafs have more money than they have any use for). In exchange, they get a mulligan on the idiotic contract they gave Clarkson. Sounds like a pretty sweet deal to me.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Jay Random For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:47 AM.
|
|