03-13-2015, 09:04 PM
|
#81
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
|
Updated.
Dallas is starting to come on strong, but they'll practically need to win out to have a shot. Calgary moves into 2nd in the Pacific and ahead of both Minnesota and Vancouver with the win. Only 4 teams are now ahead of the Flames. Whaaaat.
__________________
Fireside Chat - The #1 Flames Fan Podcast - FiresideChat.ca
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Caged Great For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-14-2015, 01:35 AM
|
#82
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
|
The difficulty of the schedule remaining breaks down as such
Vs Playoff teams
Minnesota - 12 Games
Winnipeg - 11
St. Louis - 10
Dallas - 10
Nashville - 9
LA - 9
Colorado - 8
Chicago - 7
Anaheim - 5
San Jose - 5
Vancouver - 5
Calgary - 5
Vs Non Playoff Teams
Vancouver - 10 Games
Calgary - 9
San Jose - 9
Chicago - 8
Anaheim - 7
LA - 6
Colorado - 6
St. Louis - 5
Nashville - 4
Dallas - 3
Winnipeg - 3
Minnesota - 2
__________________
Fireside Chat - The #1 Flames Fan Podcast - FiresideChat.ca
|
|
|
03-14-2015, 01:56 AM
|
#83
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
|
If Calgary finishes .500 the rest of the way, they will have 95 points. They have the tie breaker on most teams, so the record other teams will need to beat that is 96 points. They will need to post the following to hit 96.
Anaheim - 1-10-1
St. Louis - 2-12-1
Nashville - 2-10-1
Chicago - 5-10-0
Calgary - 7-6-1
Minnesota - 7-6-1
Vancouver - 8-7-0
Los Angeles - 8-6-1
Winnipeg - 9-5-0
San Jose - 10-4-0
Dallas - 11-2-0
Colorado - 11-2-1
__________________
Fireside Chat - The #1 Flames Fan Podcast - FiresideChat.ca
|
|
|
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Caged Great For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-14-2015, 09:32 AM
|
#84
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
|
Almost no way to actually clinch before the last week or two, should be exciting to say the least. Those last 2 games should be HUGE
|
|
|
03-14-2015, 09:45 AM
|
#85
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caged Great
Updated.
Dallas is starting to come on strong, but they'll practically need to win out to have a shot. Calgary moves into 2nd in the Pacific and ahead of both Minnesota and Vancouver with the win. Only 4 teams are now ahead of the Flames. Whaaaat.
|
I get 12.5 for Winnipeg and 11.5 for San Jose (and it's actually -12 and 11 because a tie will not get them in as we own the tie breaker)
Eg. Winnipeg has 78 points with 14 games left for a maximum of 106 points.
106 points - Calgary's 81 = 25 points
25 points / 2 (2 points per game given) = 12.5
Add in the fact that they own the tie breaker and it's 12
San Jose has 2 less points in as many games so it's 1 magic number lower
|
|
|
03-14-2015, 10:12 AM
|
#86
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caged Great
If Calgary finishes .500 the rest of the way, they will have 95 points. They have the tie breaker on most teams, so the record other teams will need to beat that is 96 points. They will need to post the following to hit 96.
Anaheim - 1-10-1
St. Louis - 2-12-1
Nashville - 2-10-1
Chicago - 5-10-0
Calgary - 7-6-1
Minnesota - 7-6-1
Vancouver - 8-7-0
Los Angeles - 8-6-1
Winnipeg - 9-5-0
San Jose - 10-4-0
Dallas - 11-2-0
Colorado - 11-2-1
|
That really illustrates how much work SJ, WIN, COL and DAL have to do to get in.
|
|
|
03-14-2015, 11:16 AM
|
#87
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist
I get 12.5 for Winnipeg and 11.5 for San Jose (and it's actually -12 and 11 because a tie will not get them in as we own the tie breaker)
Eg. Winnipeg has 78 points with 14 games left for a maximum of 106 points.
106 points - Calgary's 81 = 25 points
25 points / 2 (2 points per game given) = 12.5
Add in the fact that they own the tie breaker and it's 12
San Jose has 2 less points in as many games so it's 1 magic number lower
|
You've already accounted for a tie when you got to 12.5, so you can't take another 0.5 off to go to 12.
If the Flames win 12 games and get 24 points, that would give them 105 points. That wouldn't be enough to beat Winnipeg's 106. 12.5 is the magic number for a tie with Winnipeg, 13 will give the Flames an outright lead.
On a chart like this, accounting for all the different tiebreakers would be very difficult, especially when teams are tight with ROW and a couple of shootout wins can shift who holds that tiebreaker. It makes sense to do the chart accounting for outright elimination and not worry about tiebreakers.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
|
|
|
03-14-2015, 11:21 AM
|
#88
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by getbak
You've already accounted for a tie when you got to 12.5, so you can't take another 0.5 off to go to 12.
If the Flames win 12 games and get 24 points, that would give them 105 points. That wouldn't be enough to beat Winnipeg's 106. 12.5 is the magic number for a tie with Winnipeg, 13 will give the Flames an outright lead.
On a chart like this, accounting for all the different tiebreakers would be very difficult, especially when teams are tight with ROW and a couple of shootout wins can shift who holds that tiebreaker. It makes sense to do the chart accounting for outright elimination and not worry about tiebreakers.
|
The chart says 13, not 12.5 which is the correct number.
Also, I wasn't suggesting that the chart include tie breakers, but was just illustrating that it's actually lower than the number that should be listed by 0.5 because of the tie breaker
|
|
|
03-14-2015, 11:29 AM
|
#89
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist
The chart says 13, not 12.5 which is the correct number.
Also, I wasn't suggesting that the chart include tie breakers, but was just illustrating that it's actually lower than the number that should be listed by 0.5 because of the tie breaker
|
But it's not though. 13 is the Flames' magic number to guarantee they finish ahead of the Jets. 12.5 is the number to guarantee a tie.
The Jets' maximum is 106. 25 points (magic number = 12.5) will give the Flames 106 points for a tie with the Jets. 26 points (magic number = 13) will give the Flames 107 points, which is a guaranteed lead with no tiebreaker required.
The chart is tracking the guaranteed leads, so 13 is the correct Magic Number for the Flames over the Jets.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-14-2015, 11:30 AM
|
#90
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
|
Ah. I misunderstood
|
|
|
03-14-2015, 12:15 PM
|
#91
|
Voted for Kodos
|
When talking about magic numbers, you can't assume current tiebreaker status will stay the same.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to You Need a Thneed For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-14-2015, 12:20 PM
|
#92
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: YYC
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caged Great
Updated.
Dallas is starting to come on strong, but they'll practically need to win out to have a shot. Calgary moves into 2nd in the Pacific and ahead of both Minnesota and Vancouver with the win. Only 4 teams are now ahead of the Flames. Whaaaat.
|
I thought the N O G O O D for Arizona and Edmonton was another "Advanced Stat"
__________________
|
|
|
03-14-2015, 02:21 PM
|
#93
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
|
I could modify them all on the chart to account for the tiebreakers, but that would be a major pain though as they do change. I have it just set at them finishing a single point further ahead.
__________________
Fireside Chat - The #1 Flames Fan Podcast - FiresideChat.ca
|
|
|
03-14-2015, 02:28 PM
|
#94
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caged Great
I could modify them all on the chart to account for the tiebreakers, but that would be a major pain though as they do change. I have it just set at them finishing a single point further ahead.
|
That makes more sense. I was looking at it backwards, as in, what it would take for Winnipeg to pass our highest point total, rather than what Calgary needs to pass their highest point totals.
Calgary has every tie breaker so your way makes more sense
|
|
|
03-14-2015, 02:50 PM
|
#95
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Tie breakers are far from being clinched.
if Winnipeg goes 14-0-0 in regulation/overtime they have
78 pts + 28 pts = 106 pts.
27 ROW + 14 ROW = 41 ROW
The Flames could possibly go 6 regulation/overtime wins, 6 shootout wins, 1 over time loss, and 1 regulation loss.
12 pts + 12 pts + 1 pt + 81 pts = 106 pts
34 ROW + 6 ROW = 40 ROW
So Calgary wins + Winnipeg Losses would = 12.5 and Winnpeg would hold the tie breaker.
Last edited by #-3; 03-14-2015 at 03:10 PM.
Reason: sorry 106 pts not 160.
|
|
|
03-14-2015, 03:00 PM
|
#96
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by #-3
Tie breakers are far from being clinched.
if Winnipeg goes 14-0-0 in regulation/overtime they have
78 pts + 28 pts = 160 pts.
27 ROW + 14 ROW = 41 ROW
The Flames could possibly go 6 regulation/overtime wins, 6 shootout wins, 1 over time loss, and 1 regulation loss.
12 pts + 12 pts + 1 pt + 81 pts = 106 pts
34 ROW + 6 ROW = 40 ROW
So Calgary wins + Winnipeg Losses would = 12.5 and Winnpeg would hold the tie breaker.
|
That is extremely unlikely. Far from clinched is quite a stretch
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Street Pharmacist For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-14-2015, 03:04 PM
|
#97
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by #-3
if Winnipeg goes 14-0-0 in regulation/overtime they have
78 pts + 28 pts = 160 pts.
|
I think the Jets going 14-0 is approximately equally likely as them finishing the season with 160 pts.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to EldrickOnIce For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-14-2015, 03:11 PM
|
#98
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist
That is extremely unlikely. Far from clinched is quite a stretch
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EldrickOnIce
I think the Jets going 14-0 is approximately equally likely as them finishing the season with 160 pts.
|
|
|
|
03-14-2015, 10:51 PM
|
#99
|
Franchise Player
|
What a crappy night
Flames lose, Canucks win, Jets win, Wild win. Kings and Sharks lose at least. but no doubt the Kings are going to make the playoffs imo.
|
|
|
03-14-2015, 10:57 PM
|
#100
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
|
__________________
Fireside Chat - The #1 Flames Fan Podcast - FiresideChat.ca
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:56 PM.
|
|