11-15-2014, 11:37 PM
|
#81
|
Norm!
|
bumparu
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
|
|
|
11-18-2014, 10:20 PM
|
#82
|
Norm!
|
bump
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
|
|
|
11-18-2014, 10:25 PM
|
#83
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
|
Wow... didn't even need all 7 games!
__________________

Huge thanks to Dion for the signature!
|
|
|
11-18-2014, 10:38 PM
|
#84
|
#1 Goaltender
|
I think we will be at 88.4% on sports stat club after tonight.
If you look at 96 points being the bench mark the flames only have to go 4 games over .500 the rest of the season.
|
|
|
11-18-2014, 10:57 PM
|
#85
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
|
So we won in 6 games, does the Chicago game carry over and become game 1?
|
|
|
11-18-2014, 11:06 PM
|
#86
|
Norm!
|
nope, still part of the 7 games.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
|
|
|
11-19-2014, 11:05 AM
|
#87
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch
up dated for the bump
|
I'm just going to throw my vote in for starting it fresh the next game after a series ends. If the Flames were to win all 7 game sets in 7 games, they'd likely miss the playoffs by a hare. The goal has to be to win some in shorter order (like they just did) to increase the number of series and points that can be gained from each 7 game set, should we want to use this as a tracker to make the playoffs. Having a few Freebie games at then end of sets that end early seems silly to me. But either way, still fun to come in here and watch the tracking
|
|
|
11-19-2014, 12:54 PM
|
#88
|
#1 Goaltender
|
I think the point of it to not take the individual losses too hard, and to keep the losing streaks to a minimum, if you loss 3 or 4 games in a row you will loss your series. If you can consistently win these 7 game sets, then you should be prepared to the extreme highs and lows the Playoffs will bring.
|
|
|
11-19-2014, 02:31 PM
|
#89
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: 780
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan
So we won in 6 games, does the Chicago game carry over and become game 1?
|
If we start the next series with Chicago, it might help solve the problem of 82 not being divisible by 7
|
|
|
11-19-2014, 02:47 PM
|
#90
|
Norm!
|
Series 4 added, go back to page one to see the breakdown
Series 4 contains
Chicago
Devils
@ Ducks
@ Sharks
@ Coyotes
Coyotes
Avalanche
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
|
|
|
11-19-2014, 02:54 PM
|
#91
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Chicago - L
Devils - W
@ Ducks - L
@ Sharks - W
@ Coyotes - W
Coyotes - W
Avalanche - W
We win another series in 6 games and the Avalanche game counts against the next series.
|
|
|
11-19-2014, 03:14 PM
|
#92
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Chicago - OTL
Devils - W
@ Ducks - W
@ Sharks - L
@ Coyotes - W
Coyotes - L
Avalanche - W
|
|
|
11-19-2014, 04:50 PM
|
#93
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cleveland Steam Whistle
I'm just going to throw my vote in for starting it fresh the next game after a series ends. If the Flames were to win all 7 game sets in 7 games, they'd likely miss the playoffs by a hare.
|
11 7-game sets, win 44 = 88 points
1 5-game set, win 3 = 6 points
That's 94 without counting pity points, and they have two of those already. If memory serves, no team has ever missed the NHL playoffs with 96 points or more.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Jay Random For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-19-2014, 04:51 PM
|
#94
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Plett25
If we start the next series with Chicago, it might help solve the problem of 82 not being divisible by 7
|
But if too many series don't go the full 7 games, we'll have the same problem all over again.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
|
|
|
11-20-2014, 02:26 AM
|
#95
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Vancouver
|
Hartley doesn't split the series up. Nothing wrong with winning a 7 game set 5-2.
__________________
Death by 4th round picks.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to thymebalm For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-20-2014, 10:00 PM
|
#96
|
First Line Centre
|
Well, won that series 4-3.
Next 7:
New Jersey
@Anaheim
@San Jose
@Arizona
Arizona
Colorado
San Jose
Possibly an even bigger series than the one just gone because we have 5 of our divisional rivals to play. Well, 2 of them twice, but you get my drift.
Some winnable games in there. Hopefully get 6-8 points from the games v Arizona, Colorado and New Jersey, then whatever we can from the 3 games against the California teams.
|
|
|
11-23-2014, 09:53 AM
|
#97
|
Norm!
|
Bump for last two games
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
|
|
|
11-23-2014, 10:50 AM
|
#98
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Random
11 7-game sets, win 44 = 88 points
1 5-game set, win 3 = 6 points
That's 94 without counting pity points, and they have two of those already. If memory serves, no team has ever missed the NHL playoffs with 96 points or more.
|
Not sure if your post was attempting to contradict mine or back it up. Cause reading, I felt it backed up my argument
|
|
|
11-23-2014, 10:22 PM
|
#99
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cleveland Steam Whistle
Not sure if your post was attempting to contradict mine or back it up. Cause reading, I felt it backed up my argument 
|
No, I was contradicting you. If the Flames finish the season with 47 wins (which is what they will do if they win the first 11 series in 7, the last one in 5), and get no loser points except the two they already have, they will have 96 points. Nobody has ever missed the playoffs with 96, as I said.
On top of that, we know they're going to have more OT and SO losses before the season is over. If they have 47 wins, they're pretty much certain to get enough loser points to bring them up to 100 – which puts them in the playoffs easily.
Your calculations are off.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
|
|
|
11-23-2014, 10:23 PM
|
#100
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ1532
@Anaheim
|
ugh
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to nik- For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:46 PM.
|
|