03-06-2014, 02:46 PM
|
#81
|
Backup Goalie
Join Date: Dec 2013
Exp:  
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drummer
Bump. One of my wife's co-workers has a condo in one of the old brick "loft" buildings around 12 Ave in the beltline. No special assessment but his condo fees just jumped to around $750/month for a 1 bedroom loft.. A pretty large increase.
|
personally I think I'd rather have a special assessment than a jacked condo fee that rarely ever gets lowered and potentially stigmatizes the property long term making it very difficult to sell. At least with a special assessment you pay and it's done.
|
|
|
03-06-2014, 02:47 PM
|
#82
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drummer
Bump. One of my wife's co-workers has a condo in one of the old brick "loft" buildings around 12 Ave in the beltline. No special assessment but his condo fees just jumped to around $750/month for a 1 bedroom loft.. A pretty large increase.
|
What's that work out to for square footage pricing?
|
|
|
03-06-2014, 03:01 PM
|
#83
|
Crash and Bang Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigtime
What's that work out to for square footage pricing?
|
I don't know the square footage of his place, I'm guessing 700-750SF. His condo fees used to be about $475 a month.
|
|
|
03-06-2014, 03:27 PM
|
#84
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: right behind you
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drummer
Bump. One of my wife's co-workers has a condo in one of the old brick "loft" buildings around 12 Ave in the beltline. No special assessment but his condo fees just jumped to around $750/month for a 1 bedroom loft.. A pretty large increase.
|
Which building is he in?
|
|
|
03-06-2014, 04:03 PM
|
#85
|
Crash and Bang Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mustache ride
Which building is he in?
|
I don't know, the Hudson, or was it the Manhattan, or maybe the Lewis, LOL
|
|
|
03-06-2014, 04:04 PM
|
#86
|
Scoring Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by photon
I'm scared to know what mine will do, they're finally in the home stretch for flood repairs (elevators are STILL not fixed, but finally they are working rather than the elevator company and insurance company arguing).
Millions in repairs, covered by insurance, but sounds like the insurance company opted not to renew flood coverage (surprise!), and getting coverage has almost doubled insurance costs. I could go look at the budgets from the last GM to figure out what portion of my condo fee is insurance, but I don't WANT to know.
|
Are you in Union Square?
|
|
|
03-06-2014, 05:57 PM
|
#87
|
The new goggles also do nothing.
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EverfresH15
Are you in Union Square?
|
Nope, this is River Grande Estates. (It's a rental too, I don't live there, though I used to and still wish I did sometimes).
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
|
|
|
03-07-2014, 01:28 PM
|
#88
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drummer
Bump. One of my wife's co-workers has a condo in one of the old brick "loft" buildings around 12 Ave in the beltline. No special assessment but his condo fees just jumped to around $750/month for a 1 bedroom loft.. A pretty large increase.
|
From how much $700/mth or $350/mth?
|
|
|
03-08-2014, 02:51 PM
|
#89
|
Franchise Player
|
^^^
He said from $475/M
|
|
|
03-08-2014, 03:55 PM
|
#90
|
Franchise Player
|
I guess that's one way for a Condo Board to kill resale value. Well done.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
|
|
|
|
03-08-2014, 08:04 PM
|
#91
|
Crash and Bang Winger
|
Pretty much. $750 a month in condo fees are high unless you have a huge square footage.
|
|
|
03-08-2014, 10:26 PM
|
#92
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sector 7-G
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nik-
I guess that's one way for a Condo Board to kill resale value. Well done.
|
Yeah, that's a tough one. Personally I'd rather the Board Special Assess a reasonable lump sum amount to keep fees at a reasonable amount. The reality is that there will be a lot of people that either 1) Can't afford it 2) Don't want to as they plan on selling in the next year.
Is also kind of moot as anyone doing their homework reads the minutes and sees a history of special assessment.
Finally - it's not like Boards jack fees for fun. Clearly something expensive has occurred. Could be an underfunded reserve report (elevators usually clobber Boards) - that'd be my guess.
|
|
|
03-09-2014, 12:11 AM
|
#93
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by I-Hate-Hulse
Yeah, that's a tough one. Personally I'd rather the Board Special Assess a reasonable lump sum amount to keep fees at a reasonable amount. The reality is that there will be a lot of people that either 1) Can't afford it 2) Don't want to as they plan on selling in the next year.
Is also kind of moot as anyone doing their homework reads the minutes and sees a history of special assessment.
Finally - it's not like Boards jack fees for fun. Clearly something expensive has occurred. Could be an underfunded reserve report (elevators usually clobber Boards) - that'd be my guess.
|
This isnt always legal. The condo fee has to be set based on the reserve fund study plus operating expenses. I also think that by the second year of regular special assessments you would kill resale more than high fees. The only way you can really do it is to find a way to sandbag the reserve fund study when it is done. This is done by doing resolutions to say that windows and doors are owner responsibility. Or just by pushing the company doing the study to use he lower end of the range for inflation.
|
|
|
03-09-2014, 07:47 AM
|
#94
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by photon
Nope, this is River Grande Estates. (It's a rental too, I don't live there, though I used to and still wish I did sometimes).
|
At least the fees are deductible then. It would be frustrating if someone lived there as a principal residence because they'd be stuck with the full amount. What is the average selling price in this building?
|
|
|
03-09-2014, 10:27 AM
|
#95
|
The new goggles also do nothing.
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Not sure actually, haven't checked sales there for a long time.
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
|
|
|
05-07-2014, 04:09 PM
|
#96
|
Backup Goalie
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:  
|
Unfortunately have to bump this... just got a $40k special assessment in the mail today (that's the lump sum value; they say that up to 24 month payment plans may be available) for our townhouse complex. We first got wind that this would probably be coming about 2 months ago... certainly didn't expect it to be this much or this soon.
Apparently they're replacing all the windows (again), doors, siding, removing some landscaping, and assorted other bits and pieces all at once over the next 3-4 years.
What I don't understand is how one is supposed to be able to prepare for something like this. Even paying our share over 24 months would essentially our cost of living for housing. An emergency fund is great, but ultimately a drop in the bucket. When we moved in (~5 years ago), we - I thought - did all the right things. The home inspection came back relatively clean, just needed a new furnace and hot water heater eventually which we took care of. The windows had just been done and nothing else was flagged. Condo docs showed the reserve fund was great and there were no red flags.
It's honestly frustrating and I'm at a bit of a loss. We keep a maintenance fund, but it doesn't even come close to touching this. I'm extremely debt-averse and we were on track to pay off our mortgage in the next 3 years... but all our plans and best intentions seems for naught, now.
Advice?
|
|
|
05-07-2014, 04:13 PM
|
#97
|
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by maverickstruth
Advice?
|
Seems to me you are stuck, unless you can prove negligence by the Condo Board or Property Manager (and they have insurance).
|
|
|
05-07-2014, 04:19 PM
|
#98
|
Backup Goalie
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:  
|
Thanks Troutman, that's what I was afraid of. The complex was owner managed until about 1-2 years ago, and we've had 2 property management companies since then. I don't know given all that how negligence could really be proven... just sucks overall :P
|
|
|
05-07-2014, 04:27 PM
|
#99
|
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by maverickstruth
Thanks Troutman, that's what I was afraid of. The complex was owner managed until about 1-2 years ago, and we've had 2 property management companies since then. I don't know given all that how negligence could really be proven... just sucks overall :P
|
Others might think of some solutions
Hopefully your contributions add to the value of the property, and you get it back in the future when you sell.
|
|
|
05-07-2014, 04:35 PM
|
#100
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Field near Field, AB
|
I agree with Troutman, as disturbing as the assessment is, hopefully the net result is it will positively impact the sale value of the property. Also, prevent the sale value from diminishing for any serious defects.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:19 AM.
|
|