Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-11-2013, 04:53 PM   #81
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

Well would you give up Monohan and Baertschi for Petriangelo?
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2013, 04:53 PM   #82
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

But if you make an offer whereby the compensation is 2 firsts, a 2nd and a 3rd, St Louis matches.

The only chance you have is to overpay to the tune of 4 firsts to give St Louis something to think about.

And there is no way I would give up 4 firsts when we are talking lottery picks
Enoch Root is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 09-11-2013, 05:00 PM   #83
Coach
Franchise Player
 
Coach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969 View Post
Well would you give up Monohan and Baertschi for Petriangelo?
I would consider it yes. I'm not going to dump on those guys because I think they will be very good players for us, but they are still unknown. It remains to be seen whether or not either of them will translate to the NHL as well as we hope. Petro is already an elite defender and hasn't even hit his prime.

Probably not a good trade for a team in the position that we are in, and I am more driving this just for discussions sake, but people on here have already flip flopped on the Kessel trade in that it was completely lambasted when we first heard of it. Now everyone is "well we'll see if Seguin can develop into that player" now 3 years into his pro career. And Hamilton may end up being decent, but he was outplayed by an undersized, undrafted prospect last year. And Petro helps a team infinitely more than a player like Kessel.
__________________
Coach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2013, 05:00 PM   #84
Oil Stain
Franchise Player
 
Oil Stain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969 View Post
Well would you give up Monohan and Baertschi for Petriangelo?
I'd make that trade if I were Brian Burke.
Oil Stain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2013, 05:03 PM   #85
Coach
Franchise Player
 
Coach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oil Stain View Post
I'd make that trade if I were Brian Burke.
You'd throw in your top defender too (who is that?) if you were Kevin Lowe. Just as long as you maintain your First Overall Draft Pick championship banner all is well.
__________________
Coach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2013, 05:09 PM   #86
Oil Stain
Franchise Player
 
Oil Stain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MattyC View Post
You'd throw in your top defender too (who is that?) if you were Kevin Lowe. Just as long as you maintain your First Overall Draft Pick championship banner all is well.
Not sure where you are going with that.

Pietrangelo would make the Flames better today and likely remain the best player in the deal down the road as well.
Oil Stain is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Oil Stain For This Useful Post:
Old 09-11-2013, 05:13 PM   #87
Coach
Franchise Player
 
Coach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oil Stain View Post
Not sure where you are going with that.

Pietrangelo would make the Flames better today and likely remain the best player in the deal down the road as well.
My bad. Thought it was a Burke pot shot and was just getting the trash talk flowing!
__________________
Coach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2013, 10:29 AM   #88
Canada 02
Franchise Player
 
Canada 02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Exp:
Default

depending on the source, the Blues and Pietrangelo are as much as $1M apart. The Blues in the $6M range, and Alex at $7M

I would guess the Blues are using Myers ($5.5M) and Karlsson ($6.5M) as comparables, slotting Pietrangelo in the middle, and Don Meehan using Drew Doughty as the $7M comp
Canada 02 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2013, 10:48 AM   #89
Wolven
First Line Centre
 
Wolven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969 View Post
Well would you give up Monohan and Baertschi for Petriangelo?
I wouldn't. Monahan is simply too valuable based on the Flames needs. That Baertschi guy is pretty good too and my expectations for both of them are very high. Even if the Flames landed McDavid, I would rather keep Monahan (and Sven) than trade them for Petriangelo. Likewise, I wouldn't want to give the Blues any of our future 1st rounders either.

The opportunity to acquire Ekblad isn't very far out of our grasp and there are a number of other ways that the Flames can try to acquire a top line Dman over the next few years of this team's rebuild.

I would certainly consider the offersheet to Franson or simply propose a trade to the Leafs to take Liles and their first rounder off their hands for a bag of pucks... or Butler.
__________________
Wolven is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Wolven For This Useful Post:
Old 09-12-2013, 11:14 AM   #90
FlameZilla
First Line Centre
 
FlameZilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969 View Post
Well would you give up Monohan and Baertschi for Petriangelo?
I'd consider trading Brodie+ for Pietrangelo, but I think Monahan & Baertschi are too valuable to the organisation, despite being unknown quantities.

Unfortunately I don't think we have the necessary pieces required to pry Pietro away from the Blues.

Also, I dare say $7 million is a bit steep for a purely offensive defenceman. I'd want a Weber or a Chara for that kind of money; guys who bring more to the table than just offence.
FlameZilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2013, 11:20 AM   #91
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlameZilla View Post
I'd consider trading Brodie+ for Pietrangelo, but I think Monahan & Baertschi are too valuable to the organisation, despite being unknown quantities.

Unfortunately I don't think we have the necessary pieces required to pry Pietro away from the Blues.

Also, I dare say $7 million is a bit steep for a purely offensive defenceman. I'd want a Weber or a Chara for that kind of money; guys who bring more to the table than just offence.
Good thing Pietro is not a purely offensive defenceman then.

He is a very good defensive defenceman as well.
SuperMatt18 is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to SuperMatt18 For This Useful Post:
Old 09-12-2013, 12:11 PM   #92
clintb
Backup Goalie
 
clintb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlameZilla View Post

Also, I dare say $7 million is a bit steep for a purely offensive defenceman. I'd want a Weber or a Chara for that kind of money; guys who bring more to the table than just offence.


There's no way $7m is good value... he has such limited ability to cover and play strong D (but it is nice to have him on the offensive stint)
clintb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2013, 01:27 PM   #93
Coach
Franchise Player
 
Coach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Not that I think Petro is worth 7 mil (he's close though), but some in here are severely underrating the defensive aspect of his game. Just because the guy puts up good numbers does not make him a one-trick pony.
__________________
Coach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2013, 01:28 PM   #94
bubbsy
Franchise Player
 
bubbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Exp:
Default

i'd rather just hand franson 3.2 mill a year and give the leafs the compensatory 2nd round pick, than giving up the kind of assets it would take to get a guy like petro.
bubbsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2013, 02:08 PM   #95
Wolven
First Line Centre
 
Wolven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bubbsy View Post
i'd rather just hand franson 3.2 mill a year and give the leafs the compensatory 2nd round pick, than giving up the kind of assets it would take to get a guy like petro.
Exactly. Even if the Leafs end up matching that offer it then puts them in the situation where they are over the cap and need to dump salary. At that point the Flames can show up with all our cap space and offer a deal.

I do think that another team (not in a rebuild) should be going after the Petro offer sheet. Heck, if the Bruins or some other cup contender had the room it would totally be worth it as they would likely be contending for the cup most of the next 4 years. The problem is that none of those teams have the cap space to make a $7M offersheet.

Aside from the Blues, the only other playoff team that has that kind of cap space is the Senators. The Avalanche could try to make that offersheet with the hopes that it turns them into a playoff team. Realistically thought I think Petro and the Blues are stuck with each other unless a blockbuster trade comes up.
__________________
Wolven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2013, 02:23 PM   #96
bubbsy
Franchise Player
 
bubbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Exp:
Default

the oilers would be smart to try the offersheet or mega trade offer route.

they have too many small but high skill forwards, which may be enough to base a package around (eberle/gagner/yakupov/hopkins), as well as a number of decent defensive prospects they could part with.
bubbsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2013, 02:46 PM   #97
Coach
Franchise Player
 
Coach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bubbsy View Post
i'd rather just hand franson 3.2 mill a year and give the leafs the compensatory 2nd round pick, than giving up the kind of assets it would take to get a guy like petro.

Yeah I agree, I don't want to see the types of necessary assets unloaded for Petro, but I'd also rather wait and see with our own young guys than hand a spot to Franson too. The only way I wan't roster players coming into this organization now is if they are significant upgrades on what we have and potential/already young star players. If theyre not elite talents, lets just give the kids a shot.

It seems like the Blues are going to keep him regardless so it's kind of moot anyways.
__________________
Coach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2013, 02:57 PM   #98
clintb
Backup Goalie
 
clintb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969 View Post
Well would you give up Monohan and Baertschi for Petriangelo?
No way
clintb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2013, 02:58 PM   #99
clintb
Backup Goalie
 
clintb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bubbsy View Post
i'd rather just hand franson 3.2 mill a year and give the leafs the compensatory 2nd round pick, than giving up the kind of assets it would take to get a guy like petro.
Yes, that would give us TONS of options going foward vs giving up some commited prospects
clintb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2013, 02:55 PM   #100
Loyal and True
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

updated with Pietrangelo signing
Loyal and True is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:26 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy